Channel
@markinprogress
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
474subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002430480507 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @markinprogress |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/markinprogress |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 474 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:45 | 473 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:02 | 473 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (3 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,521 |
| Reactions total | 815 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 04:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
815 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 373 | 45.8% | |
| 😁 | 113 | 13.9% | |
| 🔥 | 76 | 9.33% | |
| 🥰 | 74 | 9.08% | |
| ❤🔥 | 57 | 6.99% | |
| 🤣 | 49 | 6.01% | |
| 💔 | 39 | 4.79% | |
| 💯 | 30 | 3.68% | |
| 🙈 | 4 | 0.491% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 815reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Только что ощутила полноту уязвимости материнства. Сбылся мой страх: Марк полетел с лестницы. И я, и няня его всегда страхуем и стоим между ним и нижними ступеньками, держа за ручку, либо между ним и лестницей, если он наверху. Но тут он был на втором этаже с папой, пока я убирала внизу. И тут слышу испуганный вскрик мужа, грохот и рыдания сына. Пролетел кувырком пять ступеней. Сын в порядке, плюс после осмотра я…
💔30❤14💯10
Video message, posted without a caption
❤7
Шопен для тоддлера, знаете ли, коварен. Человек мой под его ноктюрн внезапно прислушался, расслабился и заснул. Это все очень здорово, а зубы я ему как почищу теперь?
😁46❤6
Сижу работаю. В спальне няня с сыном, слышу, проснулся, и няня ему: — А что у нас сегодня в расписании с тобой? Точно! Мы должны порисовать! И радостный гик и топот бегущего со всех ног за карандашами сына. ...Блин, надо как-то синхронизировать наши расписания. Я совсем забыла, что у неё для Марка тоже программа. Рисует сын без меня сегодня. звуки мамской зависти
🥰34❤6😁5
Posted without readable text
❤29
Posted without readable text
❤21
Posted without readable text
❤41
Базовые правила всяких развивашек: как когнитивных, так и для здоровья Disclaimer перед следующими постами, а то я вас знаю, вы такие же как я, начнётся внутренний вой на внутреннем болоте самокритики • Если у вас нейротипичный и когнитивно сохранный ребёнок, ему не нужны ни Монтессори, ни Вальдорф, ни Школа 7 гномов. Ему вообще ничего не надо для развития, кроме вашей любви, еды, спокойной атмосферы дома и возможн…
❤🔥57❤18
На всякий случай напомню, что это вообще детям нафиг не надо и скорее развлекалово для родителей. Всё, что ребёнку надо — это чтобы его любили, кормили, болтали с ним и гуляли*. Дальше он сам со всем отлично справится. Без игрушек, развивашек и прочей фигни UPD: *И чтобы дома была спокойная атмосфера, где никто не орёт (регулярно) и не нервничает (постоянно).
❤31
Как я развлекаюсь в бессонные ночи, потому что у Марка опять несколько зубов лезут рядом, и я превращаюсь в живой матрас с функцией кресла-качалки? Собираю программу по развитию гусика, исходя из того, что известно мне о детском развитии. Так как Марк отращивает уже вторую неделю четыре акульих зуба, я наконец-то добила изошную и музыкальную. Морально приготовьтесь, будут посты на эту тему.
❤33🔥6
Обнаружила внезапно аккурат после покупки похожих рубашек, что лично для нас с Марком мне не уютно делать family look. На других всегда радует и умиляет. На нас — как будто бы из моего ребенка сын превращается в модный аксессуар. А мне важно уважать в нём личность, я эту личность люблю. Даже когда личность на прогулку надевает шорты в голубую полоску и любимую от тети панамку в клетку цвета сепии — и кислотную фут…
❤42🥰9
Когда гимнастический центр написал, что завтра тренировки не будет. Знаете, что. Вероника Датини когда шутила, что за здоровье тренера переживаешь больше, чем за здоровье мужа, ВООБЩЕ НЕ ШУТИЛА
😁47🙈4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @markinprogress. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 424,222 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Яна и Марк” (@markinprogress), 474 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/markinprogress.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.