Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Мариам про Директ

@mariamdirect

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,082subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002030424821
TypeChannel
Username@mariamdirect
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mariamdirect

Growth

4,0764,0824,0796 August 2026 — 4,077 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,077 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,076 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,077 subscribers12 August 2026 — 4,082 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,075–4,083 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 20:264,082+5
9 Aug 2026, 17:214,077+1
7 Aug 2026, 02:244,076-1
6 Aug 2026, 05:464,077no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:374,077first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.8%
avg views ÷ 4,082 subscribers
Avg views / post
891
1 post measured
Reaction rate
6.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held20 (11 June 20261 August 2026)
Views total891
Reactions total55
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 05:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
42s
Average length
42s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

948 reactions across 20 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥36638.6%
👍11512.1%
❤‍🔥10911.5%
😁707.38%
505.27%
🤯384.01%
🤩353.69%
😍293.06%
🥰293.06%
💯232.43%
👏222.32%
🤝181.90%
161.69%
🤓101.05%
🤔70.738%
🍾60.633%
👀20.211%
🙏20.211%
👌10.105%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 948reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 05:51 UTC891 views55 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Как попасть в «скрытые» разделы Библиотеки, если у вас доступ только на чтение Знакомая ситуация: делаете аудит, а на вкладке «Библиотека» аккаунта с доступом на чтение половины разделов просто нет — пример на изображении. Нужны «Фиды» или «Сегменты аудитории» — а их не видно. Дело не в правах доступа к самим разделам. Попасть в нужные разделы можно по ссылке. Работает это для любого недостающего раздела, я опишу,

🔥29156👏4😍1

14 Jul 2026, 12:58 UTC≈1,490 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Чем объявления в Мастерах кампаний (обычном и товарном) отличаются от комбинаторных объявлений в ЕПК Здесь я, конечно, имею в виду базовые объявления в Мастере кампаний и Товарной кампании (объявления про магазин), а не Страницы каталога и Товарные объявления. По словам представителей Яндекса, объявления из Мастеров кампаний — это по сути то же самое, что и комбинаторные. То есть ЕПК просто переняла то, что давно р

👍15🔥10🤝4🤔2👏1

14 Jul 2026, 12:03 UTC≈1,320 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Статистика по комбинаторным объявлениям Разберём, какие данные доступны, в каком виде и какие есть нюансы. 1. Мастер отчётов Данные по типу объявления можно посмотреть в группировке «Тип объявления». До обновления ТГО до комбинаторного в столбце будет указано «Текстово-графическое», после обновления то же самое объявление отобразится как «Комбинаторное». То есть в ретроспективных данных сохраняется историческая кор

👍18🤓86😍3🤔1

7 Jul 2026, 08:18 UTC≈1,650 views175 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

5 лет назад я сказала «да» лучшему мужчине на свете. И ни разу не пожалела 🩵

🔥92❤‍🔥56🥰24🍾3

6 Jul 2026, 15:46 UTC≈1,610 views91 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Я уже рассказывала, как у нас в агентстве проходят собеседования. А сегодня хочу рассказать, как мы поддерживаем сотрудников. Для меня вообще важно, чтобы человек чувствовал себя частью команды не только в рабочих вопросах. Иногда именно маленькие знаки внимания говорят больше, чем похвала. Вот как мы проявляем заботу: ✨Недавно ребята из Adgasm участвовали в хакатоне пятого потока «Курса со звёздочкой». Кто-то в сос

🔥53❤‍🔥31🥰5👍2

6 Jul 2026, 07:06 UTC≈1,690 views39 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ну, конечно – зачем такое анонсировать

🤯29🔥8👀2

2 Jul 2026, 15:23 UTC≈1,980 views43 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

Проверяем, как преобразуются заголовки текстово-графических объявлений С 14 июля текстово-графические объявления в Единых перфоманс-кампаниях начнут автоматически обновятся до комбинаторных. У комбинаторных объявлений нет отдельного дополнительного заголовка: если основной и дополнительный уложатся в лимит 56 символов, они объединятся через точку и пробел в один заголовок. Если не уложатся — дополнительный заголово

👍20😍16🔥5😁2

1 Jul 2026, 14:09 UTC≈1,600 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Рассказала редакции ppc.world, как подготовиться к обновлению ТГО до комбинаторных. 👉 Читайте в дайджесте за июнь

🔥18

25 Jun 2026, 08:01 UTC≈1,980 views59 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Как перестать есть, если ваша сестра — фуд-блогер? Никак, наслаждайтесь 😀

🤩35🔥14❤‍🔥4😁4👍2

24 Jun 2026, 19:14 UTC≈1,810 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Угадайте, к какому формату относится объявление на скриншоте Это Товарная галерея

🔥22😁4🤔3

24 Jun 2026, 06:47 UTC≈1,600 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Как работать с заголовками комбинаторных объявлений в период акций Представьте: наступил период больших акций — Чёрная пятница, новогодняя распродажа, Киберпонедельник и т.д. Как будете работать с комбинаторными объявлениями? Давайте разберём на примере группы, в которой одно комбинаторное объявление с 7 вариантами заголовков: Заголовок 1: Прямые диваны с бесплатной доставкой от 30 000 ₽ Заголовок 2: Прямые диваны.

23😍7🔥4🤓2

23 Jun 2026, 20:00 UTC≈1,330 views41 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ещё немного о заголовках комбинаторных объявлений Продолжаем разбираться с комбинаторными объявлениями. Порассуждаем: всегда ли комбинаторное объявление должно включать несколько заголовков — а в идеале все 7? На мой взгляд, есть несколько ситуаций, когда несколько заголовков объявлению не нужны или просто невозможны. 1. Длинный объект рекламирования. Бывает, что сам объект рекламирования длинный — например, промыш

🤝14❤‍🔥136💯5🔥2👌1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mariamdirect. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 173,230 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мариам про Директ” (@mariamdirect), 4,082 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mariamdirect.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.