Full resolution can be found on Maptism: https://maptism.org/maps/bell-beaker/
❤9❤🔥5👏2👌1

Channel
@maptism
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
764subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003196791214 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @maptism |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 31 December 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/maptism |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:25 | 764 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:49 | 765 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:15 | 765 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
228 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 128 | 56.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 22 | 9.65% | |
| 🔥 | 22 | 9.65% | |
| 👌 | 19 | 8.33% | |
| 👍 | 19 | 8.33% | |
| ✍ | 7 | 3.07% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 3.07% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.877% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.439% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.439% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 228reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 24 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Full resolution can be found on Maptism: https://maptism.org/maps/bell-beaker/
❤9❤🔥5👏2👌1
The Bell Beaker culture represents the Indo-European migrations into Western Europe, as multiple ancient DNA studies have shown both with Autosomal DNA, Y-DNA, mtDNA and IBD sharing. The dominant paternal lineage of the Bell Beaker culture was Y-Chromosome Haplogroup R1b-P312, which was absent anywhere west of the Rhine until 2600bc, and its father, R1b-L11, is found in Corded Ware males. R1b stands at 89% of all te…
❤8❤🔥6👏2👌1
THE BELL BEAKER CULTURE 2600-2100 BC, the Indo-European conquest of Western Europe. A Complete map of the Bell Beaker Culture (14780 Catalogued Sites) in all its forms, displaying every site, find, type, as well as supplementaries detailing Genetic Makeup, C14 dating, and Individual Find Types.
❤10❤🔥4👌1👏1
(Full res, not really that high res because i slopped this shit up in draw.io in like a day)
🔥6
Evolution of Dacians and Thracians: Illustrative Graph showing the Evolution of Southeast European Cultures from Vucedol to the Iron Age, highlighting specifically the Daco Thracian branch, and omitting the Illyrian one, which continues from Cetina downward. Based on Archaeology, since almost no Genetic material is available on the majority these Cultures.
❤8🔥3
this supports our entire >20k site Corded Ware temporal geodata at acceptable frame rates so hopefully you will see the coming Gigadrop for what it is
❤8👌2🔥1
For Free, ForEver
❤13👌1
An imageboard taking GIS geodata you can fork and edit (including e.g. the DOI you sourced) rather than actual images is coming soon on an invite-only basis, btw
❤6👍2
You're free to reverse engineer all of this as, unlike our competitors, we do not charge for Information That Wants To Be Free
❤11👌1🙏1
sneak peek at our upcoming MapCut animation engine that renders rendering our animations real-time instead of an 8h endeavor (with non-mercator projections)
❤8👌1
File, posted without a caption
❤4
Y-DNA of the Pre-Hellenic inhabitants of Greece and Crete, the Early Helladic and Minoan people. The Early Helladic stands in stark contrast to the Later Mycenaean, not just due to the presence of Steppe Lineages, but also a stark decline of the previous dominant lineage, J1b-F1615, which is extremely marginal in the Mycenaean period. L, I2a and J1a vanish completely after 1700bc, and new Lineages such as J2b-L283, …
❤11👍3👌1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @maptism. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 345,946 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Maptism Channel” (@maptism), 764 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maptism.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.