3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 441–442 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 08:37
441
-1
8 Aug 2026, 05:05
442
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:07
442
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 27 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
16.6%
avg views ÷ 441 subscribers
Avg views / post
73.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
2.74%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
18 (27 May 2025 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
73
Reactions total
2
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 05:05 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
215 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
81
37.7%
🔥
68
31.6%
👍
30
14.0%
💯
21
9.77%
💔
5
2.33%
🤔
5
2.33%
🤗
3
1.40%
🙏
1
0.465%
🥰
1
0.465%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 215reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2025 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @make_love_love. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 May 2025 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Публицист Павел Пряников о том, чем руководствуются россиянки при выборе мужа:
Лично меня шокировали результаты этого исследования российских женщин. Кандидат психологических наук Татьяна Ледовская из Ярославского педагогического университета опросила женщин возраста 18-81 год, что для них является значимыми факторами при выборе брачного партнёра («Вестник Вятского государственного университета», №3, 2021).
И что ме…
Каждая пятая пара разводится после 10 лет брака
За первые пять лет разводятся 12,5% пар, за десять — 21,6%. После тридцати лет брака — каждая третья, но дальше разводы редки: за всю жизнь в браке расходится меньше половины пар. Это следует из данных Российского мониторинга экономического положения и здоровья населения НИУ ВШЭ
Если брак все же распадается, это чаще всего происходит в первые десять лет: медианная про…
Настроение: взять и бахнуть всю правду про кризисы современные парных отношений и реальную возможность и невозможность с этим что-то сделать.
Бахнуть ?
Вчера вечером ругались с сыном.
Точнее, он был очень недоволен тем, что после прогулки, обеда в кафе, похода с его другом в игровую и последующей тусовкой в скейт парке, я в восемь вечера не хотел с ним играть.
А я устал и мне было обидно до слез (которые он мельком увидел), что нет сил на веселье.
В итоге, я решил попробовать не отталкивать и не злиться, а честно и от сердца сказать о том, что переезд, прогулка, …
Последнее время я сам мало работаю в направлении психологической помощи, но знаю, как важно иметь рядом бережного специалиста, когда внутри сложно. Поэтому хочу поделиться контактом человека, которому доверяю.
Маргарита — гештальт-терапевт, она ведёт канал, где говорит о чувствах, потребностях и о том, как быть в контакте с собой. Недавно , в день признания депрессии, она написала важные слова:
«Мы не боремся с…
Знаете за 3 года что я работаю с парами, кажется, я скопил очень много боли, как свидетель. И похоже со временем это дает о себе знать... В какой то момент мне самому потребовалась помощь. Многое не возможно просто пропускать мимо. Это действительно трудная работа. И одновременно это завораживает , побуждает задуматься над смыслом происходящего между людьми. Я вспоминаю слова Сью: "I was fascinated by relationship" "…
Я решил оживить и преобразить канал.
Кто я и зачем это?
Я больше 3-х лет занимаюсь парной терапией, помогаю парам заново построить гармоничные отношения. Какое - то время канал вёлся хаотично, но сейчас я решил его перестроить, и помочь людям открыть для себя опыт безопасных и приносящих радость отношений. Самое ценное, что я вынес — что не теоретические разборы помогают, а только новый совместный опыт меняет отн…
Почему танго учатся десять лет и почему это яркая метафора для понимания отношений?
Есть парадокс, который понимаешь не сразу. Основы — предельно просты. Тебе показывают, как стоять. Как держать баланс. Как сделать шаг — сначала один, потом вместе с партнером. «Прогулка» становится первым и главным элементом. Через час ты уже более-менее двигаешься по кругу зала.
И возникает вопрос: если всё так элементарно, почему…
Хочу поделиться с вами идеей большого проекта !, которая родилась из моего профессионального желания вывести диагностику отношений на новый уровень. Как парный психолог, я постоянно ищу способы сделать её более объективной, глубокой и структурной.
Я начал работу над созданием детального Книги-Отчёта об отношениях пары (50 - 200 страниц) . Это в первую очередь, мой профессиональный инструмент, который поможет мне как…
В 1979 году в «Литературной газете» состоялась любопытная дискуссия между авторами на тему кризиса семейных отношений. Лариса Кузнецова в статье «Кто глава вашей семьи?» рассуждает о том, что при переписи населения люди не знали, что отвечать на этот вопрос. В попытках понять, как так получилось, она пишет, что в послевоенный период женщинам пришлось взвалить и работу, и хозяйство на себя, чтобы просто выжить. И что …
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @make_love_love. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как вам сама идея такого формата — глубокого, персонального отчёта-книги о ваших отношениях?
Показался бы он вам полезным?
Да89%
Нет11%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2025 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Займитесь любовью!” (@make_love_love), 441 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/make_love_love.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
