Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 我的频道

Channel

我的频道

@magna_veritas_telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

473subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001284181649
TypeChannel
Username@magna_veritas_telegram
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/magna_veritas_telegram

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4734794767 August 2026 — 479 subscribers8 August 2026 — 479 subscribers15 August 2026 — 477 subscribers21 August 2026 — 475 subscribers28 August 2026 — 477 subscribers7 September 2026 — 474 subscribers15 September 2026 — 473 subscribers7 August 202615 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 39 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 472–480 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 08:18473-1
7 Sept 2026, 02:55474-3
28 Aug 2026, 17:24477+2
21 Aug 2026, 21:08475-2
15 Aug 2026, 00:09477-2
8 Aug 2026, 04:33479no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:12479first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 February 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 13s
Average length
5m 13s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

62 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2032.3%
😁1321.0%
👍1219.4%
👏1016.1%
🔥711.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 February 2025 to 15 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Mar 2025, 16:36 UTC≈1,580 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

AQNuhnIrCiRapJ6r1wHhGG4xS3FjGFkw7dMwBFW_aOgBDkhrTFtF9rYeWaEdxigvmzINI1DdQJcnVT4F_GkZYREG.mp4

👍53👏2

12 Mar 2025, 14:17 UTC≈1,530 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

La primera norma de este grupo es que no se puede hablar de este grupo

😁8👏6🔥3

12 Mar 2025, 14:16 UTC≈1,470 viewsread 8 August 2026

No se les ocurra impulsar el canal 😄 https://t.me/boost/magna_veritas_telegram

12 Mar 2025, 10:51 UTC≈1,910 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

OTRA MANERA DE USAR LA I.A. HAZ UNA INTERPRETACION DE LA PROFECIA DE DANIEL DE LAS SETENTA SEMANAS CONECTANDOLA CON LA GEOMETRIA SAGRADA Y LA GNOSIS La Profecía de las Setenta Semanas: Una Visión desde la Geometría Sagrada y la Gnosis La profecía de las Setenta Semanas, revelada en Daniel 9:24-27, ha sido objeto de múltiples interpretaciones a lo largo de la historia, principalmente dentro del marco escatológico j

🔥4👏2👍1

12 Mar 2025, 04:55 UTC964 viewsread 8 August 2026

👆🏻en este es en el que podeis escribir, crear chat de voz etc...

12 Mar 2025, 04:07 UTC982 viewsread 8 August 2026

https://t.me/magna_veritas_telegram?livestream=7ecb3981ecbab12ce1 CHARLAS CON MAGNA?

11 Mar 2025, 16:10 UTC943 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

si solo existes tu, en la medida que cambies, así cambiara el mundo

5

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @magna_veritas_telegram. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Nur Para Todos OFICIAL
@nurparatodos81 · 22,068
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 21 September 2026
Robert Martínez - Canal oficial
@robertmartinezastro · 51,908
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“我的频道” (@magna_veritas_telegram), 473 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/magna_veritas_telegram.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.