🪐 Llegamos a la fase más profunda en la que el magma volcánico interior hace su aparición. Esta noche entenderemos los retos, dificultades y potenciales de este momento. A las 22:00.

Channel
Robert Martínez - Canal oficial
@robertmartinezastro
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
51,169subscribers
-1,087 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001684431143 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @robertmartinezastro |
| Description | Noticias, reflexiones y enlaces a entrevistas. |
| Created | 9 October 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 64 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/robertmartinezastro |
Topic
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 12:46 | 51,169 | -19 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 22:59 | 51,188 | -19 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 17:15 | 51,207 | -11 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 17:08 | 51,218 | -18 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 17:46 | 51,236 | -12 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 19:48 | 51,248 | -20 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 22:09 | 51,268 | -12 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 20:56 | 51,280 | -21 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 18:28 | 51,301 | -13 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 18:30 | 51,314 | -6 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 21:55 | 51,320 | -13 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 21:17 | 51,333 | -21 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 19:09 | 51,354 | -6 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 21:25 | 51,360 | -14 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 20:38 | 51,374 | -14 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 19:46 | 51,388 | -17 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 22:35 | 51,405 | -10 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 21:34 | 51,415 | -22 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 18:59 | 51,437 | -21 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 17:41 | 51,458 | first reading |
Engagement
41 posts held, back to 3 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 196 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 43.7%
- avg views ÷ 51,169 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 22,300
- 6 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 6
- of 41 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 41 (3 May 2026 – 9 November 2026) |
| Views total | 134,090 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 00:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 182
- Videos
- 67
- Links
- 716
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 2m 11s
- Average length
- 2m 11s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 6 posts held from the last 30 days (16.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🐃 Justo estamos atravesando uno de los tramos más complicados del año y hoy vamos a dar las pautas para sobrellevarlo con inteligencia. Esta noche a las 22:00.
🎙 Aquí os dejo la última tertulia que tuve con Víctor Brossah y David Leyton en la que nos desahogamos y desglosamos el fenómeno hater en sus múltiples ramificaciones. Pronto habrá otras nuevas.
♏️ Arranca la fase de Escorpio y con ello miramos a noviembre, como siempre, para saber qué energías nos trae. Esta noche a las 22:00 lo veremos al detalle.
📈 Esta noche a las 22:00 tenemos nuestra cita semanal analizando los tránsitos del momento. Con la Luna llena en Tauro a punto de caramelo analizaremos por qué es tan importante planificar durante estos días y generar hábitos de éxito.
🎬Hoy iba a emitir con Enrique de Exponiendo de la verdad y hemos tenido que aplazarlo para otro día por problemas técnicos. Aun así, os traigo un nuevo podcast muy interesante que grabé con Víctor Brossah y David Leyton.
🎨🖼 Hoy a las 22:00 hablaremos de esta Luna nueva en Libra y de cómo resolver los múltiples dilemas y disyuntivas que se nos van a presentar estos días.
🪩 Esta noche analizaremos los tránsitos de octubre de 2026, con todos sus desafíos y oportunidades, así como el juego entre Libra y Escorpio y el imparable avance de Marte en Leo.
🌕♈️ LUNA LLENA EN ARIES Y SEGUNDO EQUINOCCIO: FASE DE ACCIÓN Y REACCIÓN ⚖️🔥 Llegamos al ecuador del ciclo zodiacal con el Sol en Libra y la Luna en Aries. Tras semanas de reposo, orden y meditación, entramos en una etapa de reactivación y movimiento frenético. Es el momento de poner la energía en marcha y salir a jugar. Aquí las consignas principales para aprovechar este momento astrológico: 🔥 1. Reconecta con tus …
🏐 El zodíaco llega a su ecuador y con la Luna llena en Aries empezamos una frenética fase de acción. Esta noche lo examinamos al detalle.
🔩 Esta semana no habrá directo semanal en YouTube. Lo que sí que tenemos es una charla con pronósticos en el canal de Víctor Brossah y David Leyton. ¡Que la disfrutéis!
📊 LUNA NUEVA EN VIRGO: La magia del orden y el trabajo de estas dos semanas Nos encontramos en un período de transición y sosiego entre la Luna Nueva en Virgo y la próxima Luna Llena en Aries. Este momento es una oportunidad clave para poner orden a nivel intelectual, material, metódico y espiritual antes del próximo Mercurio retrógrado. Aquí tienes las consignas principales para estructurar tu trabajo interior y pr…
Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @robertmartinezastro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@Alviseperez · 600,535#1
@Mundo_Desconocido_Oficial · 28,003#2
@flippityflop_es · 10,710#3
@APRobertMartinez · 12,742#4
@ConfiaEnElPlan · 16,130#5
@espiritutemplario · 48,020#6
@nurparatodos81 · 21,790#7
@Resonandocontuesencia · 9,253#8
@InfoVacunas · 58,284#9
@juegocosmicoviajesdenacho · 6,397#10
@canal5informa · 42,062#11
@victoriaenlaluz · 14,500#12
@CanariasDespiertaUnida · 18,422#13
@theastralmethod · 8,762#14
@Espartanos300canaloficial · 6,442#15
@miguelrix · 7,410#16
@scabelum_canaloficial · 4,183#17
@thebeginnin55 · 7,596#18
@cristinamartinjimenezescritora · 56,045#19
@dra_olaya_oficial · 20,073#20
@IustitiaEuropa · 16,192#21
@contraperiodismomatrix · 6,577#22
@vitoquilestelegram · 147,504#23
@etimik9_21_30 · 7,063#24
@culturadespierta · 4,402#25
@rubengisbertoficial · 72,055#26
@noticias5D · 6,742#27
@nadiyapopel · 12,279#28
@AS_SeLesDijo · 23,003#29
@igo1969 · 10,887#30
@marcvidal_telegram · 48,281#31
@akashacomunidad · 49,270#32
@veintiochoalmas · 4,324#33
@EstulinDaniel · 20,243#34
@rafabudo · 5,334#35
@bycpoornamidam · 5,402#36
@carlitoshumor · 1,727#37
@PLANDEMIA_MUNDIAL_COVID · 78,215#38
@LosLiberales · 7,736#39
@surfeandoelkaliyuga · 3,078#40
@PilarBaselga · 15,137#41
@noticiasocultasxreal · 27,554#42
@DraNataliaPrego · 24,377#43
@MillieLayAstrologiaQuantica · 6,694#44
@arcoiris144 · 10,477#45
@InmaculadaFdez · 9,204#46
@rafapalreal · 115,622#47
@arlequinweareoneQ · 26,962#48
@laquintacolumna · 161,230#49
@hermanosbarea · 9,389#50
@elguerrerointerdimensional · 8,504#51
@elaullido · 43,166#52
@divulgaciontotaloficial · 14,793#53
@mhc70 · 53,764#54
@UACDE · 57,224#55
@ConcienciaGalactica · 8,878#56
@eraginews · 19,955#57
@No_plandemia · 43,328#58
@benjaminfulfordinformes · 7,434#59
@MasterCMiller · 26,289#60
@movimiento_asistencia_integral · 28,073#61
@healthbest · 36,409#62
@cuestionandoloobvio · 1,110#63
@unsaltoquantico · 11,189#64
@elmercurioAON · 7,573#65
@ShadowofEzra · 144,534#66
@elconticiniomagico · 2,542#67
@CentroAstrologicoAztlan · 2,479#68
@ElDiestro · 32,791#69
@wallstwolverine · 174,926#70
@regresoalorigen0 · 17,531#71
@AbogadosDisidentes · 1,575#72
@karles_torah · 4,286#73
@magna_veritas_telegram · 468#74
@AGUAIURIS · 26,816#75
@DulceRevolucionDifusion · 30,298#76
@agenciacosmicaoficial · 4,458#77
@qthestormrider777 · 152,631#78
@liusivaya · 127,052#79
@Nueva_Medicina_Germanica · 9,144#80
@resonancia_schumann · 3,773#81
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@dra_olaya_oficial · 20,073
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 29 September 2026
@oliveribanez · 18,548
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 5 October 2026
@JosepPamiesOficial · 73,135
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 August 2026
@Mundo_Desconocido_Oficial · 28,003
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 9 September 2026
@miastral · 122,058
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 August 2026
@nurparatodos81 · 21,790
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 21 September 2026
@cloritodesodio · 23,339
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 18 September 2026
@InfoVacunas · 58,284
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 22 August 2026
@DulceRevolucionDifusion · 30,298
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 7 September 2026
@movimiento_asistencia_integral · 28,073
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 September 2026
@akashacomunidad · 49,270
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 August 2026
@ivandonalsonoficial · 22,923
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 September 2026
@andreaskalckerofficial · 58,567
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 5 October 2026
@eraginews · 19,955
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 27 September 2026
@healthbest · 36,409
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Robert Martínez - Canal oficial” (@robertmartinezastro), 51,169 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/robertmartinezastro.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.