Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Mafia Airdrop

@mafiadrops

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

665subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002094115322
TypeChannel
Username@mafiadrops
DescriptionMafia Airdrop provides information about potential airdrop ( There are no bot airdrops, only third party airdrop, testnet and pre retroactive ) Discussion Group 👇 https://t.me/mafia_airdrop_discussion Degen Group 👇 https://t.me/mafia_alpha_degen
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/mafiadrops

Topic

Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@mafiadrops/4952 · this entry15 Jun 2026, 10:39 UTC@airdropintelligent/694615 Jun 2026, 10:39 UTC1.00under a minute
@mafiadrops/4953 · this entry15 Jun 2026, 11:33 UTC@airdropintelligent/694715 Jun 2026, 11:33 UTC1.00under a minute
@mafiadrops/4954 · this entry11 Jul 2026, 21:56 UTC@airdropintelligent/695511 Jul 2026, 21:56 UTC1.00under a minute
@mafiadrops/4955 · this entry22 Jul 2026, 13:59 UTC@airdropintelligent/695622 Jul 2026, 13:59 UTC1.00under a minute
@airdropintelligent/695722 Jul 2026, 14:49 UTC@mafiadrops/4956 · this entry22 Jul 2026, 14:49 UTC1.00under a minute
@mafiadrops/4962 · this entry28 Jul 2026, 10:30 UTC@airdropintelligent/696228 Jul 2026, 10:30 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@airdropintelligent7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@airdropintelligent (70)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 7 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 12 comparable posts for this entry, running 13 June 2026 to 28 July 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @airdropintelligent. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

6657 Aug 2026, 12:51 — 665 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 02:34 — 665 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 12:518 Aug 2026, 02:34
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 664–666 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 02:34665no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:51665first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 13 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.99%
avg views ÷ 665 subscribers
Avg views / post
33.2
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
10
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026
Posts held18 (13 June 202628 July 2026)
Views total332
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 02:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,810
Videos
48
Links
2,740

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

28 Jul 2026, 12:36 UTC28 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

FCFS lagi voc gate $150 buat CFD https://www.gate.com/campaigns/5655?ref=VQdEXVkO&ref_type=132

Signed A-Z | 1M USD SOON⚡

28 Jul 2026, 12:19 UTC27 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Claim lagi voc gate https://www.gate.com/campaigns/5570?ref=VQdEXVkO&ref_type=132 https://www.gate.com/campaigns/5640?ref=VQdEXVkO&ref_type=132

Signed A-Z | 1M USD SOON⚡

28 Jul 2026, 10:30 UTC25 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Free $10 voucher futures Scan QR di Gate Exchange Atau pencet link https://www.gate.com/campaigns/5639?ref=VQdEXVkO&ref_type=132&utm_cmp=EyWxSian https://www.gate.com/campaigns/5654?ref_type=132&utm_cmp=P33KaPIn

Signed A-Z | 1M USD SOON⚡

23 Jul 2026, 16:53 UTC40 viewsread 8 August 2026

Buat yang pengen dateng ke coinfestasia 2026 tapi belum punya ticket kalian bisa ikutan giveaway ticket nya tokocrypto di ig https://www.instagram.com/p/DbIgB2Gxtxe/?igsh=cmVsNXcwMnZ6eWpt #Yangmaumauajabang

Signed 0xrizky

23 Jul 2026, 15:49 UTC37 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ini juga sekalian kalen scan di aplikasi Gate.io Exchange FCFS FCFS

Signed A-Z | 1M USD SOON⚡

23 Jul 2026, 15:38 UTC31 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Scan ini di aplikasi Gate.io Exchange FCFS 10 USDT langsung masuk Cepetan wkakwa

Signed A-Z | 1M USD SOON⚡

22 Jul 2026, 14:54 UTC35 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Syaratnya gampang, modal minimal $5 Soalnya make leverage, nanti tinggal buka tutup aja

Signed A-Z | 1M USD SOON⚡

22 Jul 2026, 14:49 UTC29 viewsread 8 August 2026

Barusan ku lihat di X mereka dapat $5 buat user pertama kali trade/predict, FCFS 1000 terakhir tgl 31 juli tapi sepi😅 Coba cek disini : https://telegram.me/EverythingTradeOfficial_bot?start=SBT_Tsani

Signed A-Z | 1M USD SOON⚡

22 Jul 2026, 13:59 UTC40 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

REMINDER 🔰 Travis Run Airdrop Instant 💰 Reward $TRVS Token For All 👉 Go To : https://t.me/trvsrunbot?start=ref_13404926 ➖ Download AXM Wallet : https://axiome.fra1.cdn.digitaloceanspaces.com/releases/android/axmapp-release-2-6-80.apk ➖ Withdraw Your $TRVS Token On AXM Wallet Later ➖ Swap TRVS To AXM : https://app.axiometrade.pro/swap/AXM-TRVS ➖ Withdraw To Mexc Exchange ➖ Done Salary Distribution At Weekly From Pe

Signed A-Z | 1M USD SOON⚡

11 Jul 2026, 21:56 UTC46 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔰 Pintu Exchange Airdrop 💰 Reward 1 Credits Game 👉 Go To : https://apps.pintu.co.id/fjuG/pintureferralcode ➖ Create Account & KYC ➖ Download App : https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.valar.pintu ➖ Go To BTC Game Page ➖ Play The Game Until You Get Three Correct Guesses ➖ Get Additional Credit When You Trade With A Minimum Of $1 ➖ Done Pintu Exchange Has Been Verified By Pedagang Fisik Asset Kripto (FPA

Signed A-Z | 1M USD SOON⚡

15 Jun 2026, 11:33 UTC56 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔰 Travis Run Airdrop Instant 💰 Reward $TRVS Token For All 👉 Go To : https://t.me/trvsrunbot?start=ref_13404926 ➖ Download AXM Wallet ➖ Withdraw Your $TRVS Token On AXM Wallet Soon ➖ Swap TRVS To AXM ➖ Withdraw To Mexc Exchange ➖ Done Salary Distribution At Weekly From Performance Gem, Don't Forget To Play It's Game To Earn Gem

Signed A-Z | 1M USD SOON⚡

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @mafiadrops. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 994,910 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mafia Airdrop” (@mafiadrops), 665 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mafiadrops.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.