Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Madina Miytan

Channel

Madina Miytan

@madina_miytan

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

475subscribers

+31 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001283956211
TypeChannel
Username@madina_miytan
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/madina_miytan

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

434475454.57 August 2026 — 444 subscribers8 August 2026 — 444 subscribers15 August 2026 — 439 subscribers30 August 2026 — 436 subscribers8 September 2026 — 434 subscribers16 September 2026 — 475 subscribers7 August 202616 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 40 days, net +31. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 428–481 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 07:16475+41
8 Sept 2026, 20:19434-2
30 Aug 2026, 07:33436-3
15 Aug 2026, 18:29439-5
8 Aug 2026, 05:04444no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:50444first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 5 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

152 reactions across 17 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4328.3%
4227.6%
👍2919.1%
💯149.21%
😁63.95%
🥰53.29%
21.32%
🎉21.32%
👏21.32%
👎10.658%
💘10.658%
🕊10.658%
😘10.658%
😭10.658%
🤝10.658%
🤯10.658%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 152 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 06:27 UTC87 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Яқин бир ойлар ичида бир ишларим туфайли вилоятга ва чекка жойларига бир неча бор бориб келишимга тўғри келди. Одамларни тадқиқотчи назари билан кузатиш анча осон деб ўйлайман. Ёмон танқидчи нигоҳи билан қарамайсан, ёқимсиз муомиласидан ҳам, қўполлигидан, ёлғончилигидан, умуман доим ўзини ҳимоя қилишга шай турадиган аёрлиги-ю олғирлигидан ҳам жазавага тушмайсан. Шарт-шароит ва муҳитга қараб туриб, кетма-кет такрори

👍3👏2🔥2💯1🤯1

7 Aug 2026, 05:45 UTC92 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Албер Камюнинг ёзишича, биз кўпинча ўзимиздан яхшироқ инсонларга ишонч билдирмаймиз. Аксинча, улардан узоқроқ юришни маъқул кўрамиз. Биз кўпроқ ўзимизга ўхшаган, худди шундай заифликларга эга бўлган одамлар билан дардимизни бўлишамиз. Нима учун шундай? Чунки биз аслида ўзгаришни эмас, балки шундайлигимизча — барча заифликларимиз билан бирга — тушунилишни, оқланишни истаймиз. Чамамда кўп инсонларга раҳм-шафқат, далда

👍65

6 Aug 2026, 09:13 UTC115 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Хайрли кун ҳаммага! Танаффус тугади😁 Эсингизларда бўлса бир муддат лотин алифбосида ёзиб бошлаган эдим ва қисқа муддатда ўрганиб ҳам қолувдим. Ора-ора ҳалиям лотин алифбосида ёзиб тураман, умуман олганда ёзиш ва ўқиш ўша тажрибамдан кейин анчагина қулайлашиб қолган эди. Аммо, яна кирилл алифбосига қайтишимни сабаби яна ўзгариши ҳақидаги турли хабарлар эди. Тўғриси, мен 2 чи хил лотин алифбосига ўтишга қаршиман ва

🔥9💯43🎉2🤝1

7 Jul 2026, 05:39 UTC298 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Танқидий фикрлаш (критик тафаккур) ҳақида ҳозир жуда кўп гапирилаяпти, ўзим ҳам бу ҳақда жуда кўп ёзаман. Бу жудаям фойдали кўникма. Мантиқий хатоларни кўришга, манипуляцияларга бирдан ишонмасликка ёрдам беради. Тўғриси шу пайтгача билсамда танқидий фикрлашдаги бир муаммо ҳақида ҳеч ёзмаганман. Атайин эмас. Эҳтимол қандай ёзишни билмагандирман ёки касбий амалиётимнинг нозик томонларини улашишни қизғонгандирман. Хулл

🔥85👍32🕊1

5 Jul 2026, 10:31 UTC≈1,080 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026

"сенга доимий стресс берадиган одамлардан қоч, кет, унақаларни ҳаётингдан чиқариб ташла" — деган оҳангдаги "психологик маслаҳатлар" роса трендда. Шунақа маслаҳатларни ўқиб ёки эшитсам: "а ҳа, уриниб кўр, агар уддаласанг "сенга салом депрессия" — дейман ичимда)) Ўртоғлар бир нарсани тўғрилигига аниқ ишонч билан гапириш учун кўп эмас, озроқ ўйлаш етарли. Масалан, сенга доимий стресс берувчилар кимлар бўлиши мумкин

🔥10💯54👍3😭1

3 Jul 2026, 05:38 UTC306 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Бу 👉 @Psixologiya_Mindfulness каналимни оммавий ҳаммага очиқ қурилмасини ҳозир ёпаман! Чунки, бу каналимни асосан коллегалар ва ҳақиқатдан психологик маърифатини оширмоқчи бўлган инсонлар бўлиши учун очганман. Сон эмас, сифат учун. У ерда бу ердагидек шахсий фикрларим ёки провокацион постлар қўймаганман. Оммабоп публика йўқ. Зерикарли. Илмий далилларга асосланган психология миядан куч талаб қилади, қизиқишни ўзи кам

💯4👎1

3 Jul 2026, 04:43 UTC216 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Когнитив хатоликлар — кундалик ҳаётимиздаги "фикр тузоқлари"дир. Ҳар куним биз минглаб хабар, реклама, сарлавҳа ва фикрларга дуч келамиз. Аммо жуда кам одам ўйлайдики, миямиз бу оқимни қайта ишлашда доимий равишда маълум "қисқа йўллар"дан (когнитив эвристика, cognitive heuristics) фойдаланади. Ва айнан шу қисқа йўллар баъзан бизни хато хулосаларга олиб келади. Психологияда бу ҳодиса когнитив хатолик (когнитивное ис

5🔥2

1 Jul 2026, 08:16 UTC247 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Шу охирги ойларда фб да бироз фаол бўлдим, миямда мардакча тараканларим безовта қилган пайтларда ҳовур босдди учун😄

😁4😘1

1 Jul 2026, 08:13 UTC257 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Умуман олганда ўзимга расман дам олишни бошладим. Но, истисно тарзида (айрим тўхташим ёки танаффус беришим керак бўлмаганлар) ишлашим шарт бўлганлари бор. Хуллас, "салом ёз" энди бошландими😄

🥰52

1 Jul 2026, 08:09 UTC270 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ҳа, айтганча Ялом ва унинг оиласи атрофида бўлаётган ғийбатларни кузвтишдан ҳам қуруқ қолмаяпман. Биласизлар Яломнинг ўзию-фаолиятю, китобларидан тортиб оиласигача мен учун алоҳида ўрин тутади.

4😁2

1 Jul 2026, 08:04 UTC263 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Хайрли кун, ҳурматли обуначилар! Орада бир ойлар ёзмадим ҳисоб. Вақтим бўлмади деёлмайман, бўлди. Лекин, иш фаолиятимнинг шунақа қизиқ палласи бўлдики, ёзадиганларим кўпдек бўлса-да, ҳаммаси жараёндаги тугалланмаган нарсалар эди. Биласизлар, асосан психологик консультациянинг индивидуал кўринишида ишлайман. Онлайн форматда асосан. Аввал шахсан кўришиб ишлашга талаб бўлган бўлса, энди деярли мижозлар ўзи онлайн ишла

🔥64

30 Jun 2026, 17:27 UTC227 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Болаларимиз ҳақида интернетда кўп улашамиз, шахсан ҳар сафар ўзим ҳам шундай инфо улашаётганимда кўп иккиланаман. APA нашрида шу мавзуга оид қизиқ бир таҳлилий мақолага кўзим тушди, яъни "шарентинг" ҳақида. Бу сўз "share" (улашиш) ва "parenting" (ота-оналик) сўзларидан ясалган, яъни ота-онанинг боласи ҳақидаги маълумотларни улашиши. Мавзу менга яқин, чунки амалиётимда кўплаб ота-оналар билан ишлайман ва бу масала

👍4🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @madina_miytan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Madina Miytan” (@madina_miytan), 475 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/madina_miytan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.