Channel
@khurshidyuldosh
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,031subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001736253429 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @khurshidyuldosh |
| Created | 6 August 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/khurshidyuldosh |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:05 | 2,031 | -5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 2,036 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:10 | 2,041 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:22 | 2,040 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:57 | 2,040 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 14 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (14 December 2025 – 26 July 2026) |
| Views total | 3,884 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Teshik tog‘ora va kosmik kema o‘rtasida sarson Rumiy, Rabg’uziy, Navoiyni nashr qilish uchun ruxsat olish kerakmi? Yuqorigoridagi bu postni o‘qib, undan avval yozgan SI haqidagi gaplarimni esladim, kulgim qistadi: bir qo’limiz bilan kelajakka intilamiz, umuminsoniy va milliy qadriyat va madaniyat haqida gapiramiz, ikkinchi qo‘limiz bilan esa yaqin o‘tmishdan qolgan, absurd tartibotga yopishib olganmiz. Noshir akala…
Aslida SIga mas’uliyat yuklash masalasiga yetib borguncha hal qilinishi yoki yumshatilishi kerak bo‘lgan boshqa muammolar bor: SI insoniy qadriyatlarga muvofiq ishlashini qanday kafolatlaymiz, bias masalasini qanday hal qilamiz va hk. Bularni hal qilmasdan, SIning avtonomligi masalasi ham axloq, ham legal jihatdan muammoli bo‘lib qolaveradi. Biz rivojlanayotgan jamiyat bo’lganimiz sababli biz uchun hozir pragmatik, …
Sun’iy intellekt va mas’uliyat bo‘shlig‘i Mas’uliyat, javobgarlik kabi tushunchalar insonga nisbatan qo‘llab kelingan. Hech kim biror jonsiz narsa yo biror hayvonni biror qilmish uchun mas’ul, javobgar hisoblamagan. Hatto inson ham aqli noqis yoki voyaga yetmagan bo‘lsa, mas’uliyat va javobgarlikdan aksar hollarda ozod qilingan. Mas’uliyat sizning ongli tarzda qaror qabul qilib, shunga muvofiq harakat qilishingiz …
Rumiy va Rabgʻuziy Oʻzbekistonda ruxsatsiz tarqatish mumkin boʻlmagan adabiyotlarmi? Navoiy-chi? Kitob savdosi bilan shugʻullanuvchi doʻkonlar (bularning orasida kitob nashri va savdosiga ixtisoslashgan yirik tarmoqlar ham bor) bir qiziq - va absurd - holatdan shikoyat qilishmoqda. Ularning aytishicha, kitob doʻkonlarini vaqti-vaqti bilan maxsus tekshiruvchilar tekshirib, ozgina diniy mazmundagi (yoki shunga yaqin) …
Nima uchun SI gigantlari faylasuflarni ishga olmoqda? O'n yil oldin gumanitar fanlar talabalariga yaxshi ish topish uchun "kod yozishni o'rganish" maslahat berilardi. Bugun esa vaziyat butunlay o'zgargan: endi sun'iy idrok (SI) tufayli o'z ishidan ayrilishdan dasturchilarning o'zi ko'proq xavotirda. Nyu-York Federal zaxira bankining 2024-yilgi ma'lumotlariga ko'ra, AQShda kompyuter fanlari bitiruvchilari orasida ish…
Butun nega qismlar yig‘indisidan katta? Falsafada shunday bahs bor, “Butun qismlar yig‘indisiga tengmi yoki undan katta?” Shu masala mohiyatini hatto falsafa talabalarining ham mutlaq ko‘pchiligi tushunmasdan o‘qishni bitiradi. Ba’zilar bunga eski, siyqa va hayotdan uzilgan bahs deb qaraydi. “Butun qismlari yig‘indisidan katta” degani qismlarning o‘zaro munosabati har bir qismda yo‘q bo‘lgan xususiyatni paydo qilad…
Farengeyt Press’dan yangi xushxabar Donella Meadows'ning dunyo bo‘ylab millionlab kitobxonlar, menejerlar, tadbirkorlar, siyosatchilar va tadqiqotchilar mutolaa qilayotgan mashhur "Thinking in Systems" asarini o‘zbek tilida nashr etish huquqini olganimizni ma’lum qilamiz. Nega bu kitob muhim? Hayotimizdagi eng katta muammolarning aksariyati alohida hodisalar yoki shaxslar emas, balki tizimlar natijasidir. Nega ti…
Bir qarashda oddiy, ammo amal qilinsa, intellektual saviya va madaniyatni sezilarli oshiradigan qoida va tavsiyalar to‘plami. Sentabr oxirlarida nashr qilinadi. Ayniqsa, talabalarga tavsiya qilaman. Turli muhokamalar, debatlarga qiziqadiganlarga ham asqatadi.
Obro‘li adabiy jurnallardan biri “Granta”da chop qilingan va jurnal mukofotini yutgani aytilgan hikoyani sun‘iy intellekt yozgan ekan. Hikoyani saralashda qatnashgan adabiy ekspertlar uni SI yozganini farqlay olmagan. Nafaqat farqlamagan, ko‘kka ko‘tarib maqtaganlar ham (“precise yet richly evocative”). Nobel laureatlari hikoyalarini bosgan bu jurnal farqlay olmagan soxtalikni adabiyotchi mutaxassis emas, SI bo‘yich…
https://khyuldoshev.wordpress.com/2026/05/31/suniy-intellekt-olamida-insonni-izlash/
Жамият ва виждон Достоевскийнинг кўп асарларида шундай ҳолат учрайди: кимдир бирор ёмон иш қилади, дейлик, одам ўлдиради. Аммо унинг жиноятини ҳеч ким билмайди. Одамлар учун у беайб, пок, баъзилари ҳатто баобрў ҳам. Аммо улар азоб ва зиддият ичида яшайди — айримлари қўлга тушишдан қўрққанидан, бошқалари эса жамиятда қозонган обрўси аслида ўзининг чинакам кимлигига, ўзлигига мос келмаганидан: одамлар мени яхши дейди…
Фактлар гапиради дейишади. Йўқ, фактлар соқов, ўз ҳолича гапиролмайди, балки гапиртирилади. Олим фактни ўз назарий андазасига солиб, умумқабул қилинган методлар асосида изоҳлайди, ундан чиқадиган хулосаларни баён этади. Аммо бу фактнинг эмас, илмий методология ва назариянинг гапиришидир. (Айни бир фактдан икки олим икки хил хулоса чиқариб қўйиши мумкин эмасми?) Фактлар гапириши тарихни ўрганаётганда айниқса ўзига х…
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @khurshidyuldosh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 389,970 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“G‘oyalar va soyalar” (@khurshidyuldosh), 2,031 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/khurshidyuldosh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.