Channel
@m_d_negar
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
271subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001054542553 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @m_d_negar |
| Created | Between 1 May 2016 and 31 January 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/m_d_negar |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 10:35 | 271 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:17 | 273 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 273 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (28 April 2025 – 30 July 2026) |
| Views total | 1,030 |
| Reactions total | 30 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 05:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
242 reactions across 18 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 84 | 34.7% | |
| 👍 | 80 | 33.1% | |
| 🔥 | 25 | 10.3% | |
| 👌 | 15 | 6.20% | |
| 😍 | 8 | 3.31% | |
| 🤡 | 8 | 3.31% | |
| 👎 | 5 | 2.07% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 1.65% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 1.65% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 1.24% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 0.826% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 0.826% | |
| 🤨 | 2 | 0.826% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 242reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 April 2025 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
هوش مصنوعی چه چیزی نمیشود (بخش اول) بحث درباره آینده هوش مصنوعی برای بسیاری از این سوال آغاز میشود: هوش مصنوعی در نهایت چه کارهایی میتواند انجام دهد. در کنار آن سوالهای جالب دیگری هم وجود دارد، مثلا ما حاضر خواهیم شد چه جایگاهی را به این ابزار، بدهیم. این دو سؤال یکی نیستند. هوش مصنوعی احتمالا در نهایت در بسیاری از حوزهها از اغلب انسانها سریعتر، دقیقتر و کمخطاتر خواهد شد، اما این توانایی بیشتر لزوما به معن…
👍3❤2👎2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4jsJNT5nAXU نکته های مهم سواد مالی برای رسیدن به آزادی مالی: ۱. تعیین عدد دقیق آزادی مالی با ضرب هزینه سالانه در ۲۵ ۲. پس کاهش هزینهها به معنای نزدیکتر شدن به هدف است. هر سکهای که صرفهجویی شود، ۲۵ سکه از هدف نهایی کم میکند. ۳. فاصله بین درآمد و هزینهها مهمتر از میزان درآمد است. وقتی افزایش درآمد باعث به افزایش هزینهها باشه، یعنی به آزادی نزدیک نشدیم. ۴. یادگیری مداوم ضروری است…
👍4🔥1
کارآفرینی این شکلیه
😍8👍4😁4😭2
مسئله امروز ایران، چطور حل میشود! برای این که بتوانیم برای مشکل امروز ایران راه حلی طراحی کنیم، اول باید بفهمیم که مشکل امروز ایران چیست! خیلی از افراد -مخصوصا سیاستمداران- میگویند، سادهست که، ما تحریمیم، پس دنیا نمیتواند با ما تجارت کند و این باعث فقر ما شده است. کسانی که کمی عمیقترند میگویند، دنیا به خاطر تحریمها نمیتواند در ما سرمایه گذاری کند. پس چنین افرادی به دنبال راه حل هایی از جنس توافقنامه هایی ب…
🔥6👍5❤3🤔3👎1
اگه این تعریف از ثروت را بپذیریم که «ثروت به معنی آزادی برای مصرف زمان» باشه. باید بگم ما در دوران کودکی ثروتمند ترین در جهان بودیم و هر چه جلو تر اومدیم از ثروتمون کم شده
👍15🤨2👎1
نگو فقط مشکل را نیاور؛ راهحل هم بیاور جمله بالا باعث حذف مشکلات نمیشود. این طرز بیان باعث میشود افراد سختترین مشکلات را مطرح نکنند. رهبران باید مطالب را در مورد آنچه که خراب است بشنوند حتی اگر راهحلش هنوز معلوم نباشد. گزینهی بهتر این است: «مشکل را بیاور، به شرط آنکه حاضر باشی بخشی از راهحل هم باشی.» منبع: توییتر آدام گرنت، بازنشر ترجمه شده از کانال Dailywisdomhub 🆔@Tavaroghstd
❤5🔥1
🗣 10 مقاله پیشنهادی برای شروع مطالعه در استارتاپ لب 1️⃣ کارهایی را انجام دهید که مقیاس پذیر نیستند 2️⃣ پادکست کارهایی انجام دهید که مقیاسپذیر نیستند 3️⃣ عشق مشتری، تمام آن چیزی است که به آن نیاز دارید 4️⃣ چگونه ایده های استارتاپی پیدا کنیم؟ 5️⃣ “کارهای روی زمین مانده” مشتریان خود را بشناسید. 6️⃣ پادکست پلتفرم باش 7️⃣ خوب باش 8️⃣ کالبدشکافی عزم 9️⃣ چرا آدم های بدجنس می بازند؟ 🔟 چرا امن است که بنیانگذاران، …
❤5
وقتی برای اولین بار حسن طهرانی مقدم یک نمونه اولیه موشک را آزمایش کرد، چند متر بالا رفت و ترکید. آن روز آرزویشان این بود که موشک چند کیلومتر آنطرفتر برود و بعد به زمین بخورد. اگر کسی آن روز میگفت که موشکی بسازید که دوهزار کیلومتر برود و هفت لایه از تکنولوژیهای دفاع ضدموشکی تمام دنیا عبور کند و با دقت بالا به هدف اصابت کند و یک محله را ویران کند همه به او میخندیدند و مسخرهاش میکردند. احتمالا با حیرت از او میپر…
❤21
دستِ تند اگر تازه دارید در فضای مهندسی کامپیوتر یا توسعه کارتون رو شروع میکنید، یک وقت خوبی بگذارید روی سرعت تایپتون. به نظرم اینکه ایدههای ذهن رو بتونید با سرعت بیشتری به کامپیوتر مخابره کنید، خیلی تأثیر مثبتی روی اعتماد به نفس، و شاید سرعت یادگیری شما داره. بعد اگر خواستید کار رو حرفهای پیش ببرید، مطمئن شید terminal براتون مثل خونه میمونه. هر جا فرصت شد وقت بذارید و مفاهیمش رو یاد بگیرید. Pipe کردن دستورات، …
👍8❤3
احتمالا با خبر شدهاید که رهبر انقلاب، امشب (شب عاشورا) تو مراسم عزاداری شرکت کردهاند. قلب ما وا شد، اما همین باز شدن دل برام شده مثل روضه... 😢
❤26🤡8❤🔥4😢2
حالا وقت تمرین همکاری است جنگی که پشت سر گذاشتیم، برای مدتی تجربهی شیرین و نابی را فراهم کرد—تجربهی همدلی و در کنار هم بودن. فرصتی که مقابله با یک دشمن خارجی فراهم کرد باعث شد گرد و خاک تفرقهها بخوابد و ما، دست در دست هم، اتحاد درونیمان را به چشم ببینیم. این همدلی فقط یک واکنش لحظهای نبود؛ نشانهای بود از گوهری که در عمق ریشهی هویت جمعی ما پنهان شده بود. پنهان به حدی که به نظر میرسید اصلاً وجود ندارد! حال یک…
👍12
آدرس کانال در بله هم مشابه همین جاست: @m_d_negar https://ble.ir/m_d_negar
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @m_d_negar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 964,405 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“دغدغه نگار” (@m_d_negar), 271 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/m_d_negar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.