Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

®𝘿𝙖𝙙𝙏𝙑(杭州、上海)

@lyfulishe

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

60,638subscribers

+1,545 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003043636750
TypeChannel
Username@lyfulishe
Description杭州验牌官 出击指向灯 【大D全家桶 一键订阅 防止走丢】 https://t.me/addlist/DDD97ahjiwoyNTJk 【杭州狼友之家】 @dadpianyou 【杭州福利姬认证榜单】 @dadjingxuan 推广联系 | @dadbaobao 双向机器人 | @dadzhuli_bot 推特X | @dadbaobao
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/lyfulishe

Growth

59,09360,63859,865.56 August 2026 — 59,093 subscribers6 August 2026 — 59,112 subscribers7 August 2026 — 59,385 subscribers8 August 2026 — 59,617 subscribers9 August 2026 — 59,855 subscribers10 August 2026 — 60,019 subscribers11 August 2026 — 60,133 subscribers12 August 2026 — 60,234 subscribers14 August 2026 — 60,638 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net +1,545. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 58,861–60,870 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 09:3660,638+404
12 Aug 2026, 23:5560,234+101
11 Aug 2026, 21:0360,133+114
10 Aug 2026, 20:3860,019+164
9 Aug 2026, 23:3559,855+238
8 Aug 2026, 22:2159,617+232
7 Aug 2026, 20:5859,385+273
6 Aug 2026, 23:2259,112+19
6 Aug 2026, 20:4859,093first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.70%
avg views ÷ 60,638 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,670
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.144%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 22 of 27 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held27 (3 August 202614 August 2026)
Views total126,029
Reactions total169
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 23:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
282
Videos
64
Links
194

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
34s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

169 reactions across 22 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9656.8%
🔥3721.9%
👍3621.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 169reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
14
of 27 we hold a reading for · 52%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lyfulishe. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 27 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 16:22 UTC≈1,160 views3 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

满心期待的点了一锅生蚝 结果看到每个都一圈黑裙边 大黑逼都能下去嘴 看到这玩意儿真的人麻了🤮

3

14 Aug 2026, 10:13 UTC≈1,790 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

TG必备的搜索引擎,快搜kuai帮你发现有趣群组、频道、视频、音乐、电影、新闻 | Find cool stuff all in one bot! 机器人:@kuai @kuaia @kuaiaa 👉 https://t.me/kuai?start=a_1EI76P

14 Aug 2026, 06:06 UTC≈2,360 views4 reactionsread 14 August 2026

香香 @xiangxiang801616 老师红休回归 带货主播下海 性价比 口粮菜

2👍1🔥1

13 Aug 2026, 18:07 UTC≈3,040 views4 reactionsread 14 August 2026

泰国正品一手果冻货源,保证正品👍 目前最火爆的泰国小果冻 🔥🔥 男人的加油站 ⛽️⛽️⛽️ 女人的美容院💪 (让你做回真正的猛男)(让他拜倒石榴裙下) 一盒7包 7种不同水果味 可兑水兑饮料喝也可直接服用 另有马来西亚进口男士巧克力,效果强大,好吃,且无副作用,一颗猛3天 下单咨询可私信 @jijijici (客服) @TTzzz888 (客服) @Tthy888bot 双向机器人 之前巧克力测评:https://t.me/lyfulishe/1347

2👍1🔥1

13 Aug 2026, 04:16 UTC≈1,680 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

TG必备的搜索引擎,快搜kuai帮你发现有趣群组、频道、视频、音乐、电影、新闻 | Find cool stuff all in one bot! 机器人:@kuai @kuaia @kuaiaa 👉 https://t.me/kuai?start=a_1EI76P

12 Aug 2026, 09:40 UTC≈4,270 views4 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🎰 三秒请你抽红包(第一期) 📮 参与条件: 🌏️ 归属地 浙江 🪪 必须设置用户名 🎫 加入-杭州三秒同学会 └ 🎟️ 发言数大于 100 条 🎫 加入-®𝘿𝙖𝙙𝙏𝙑(杭州、上海) 🎫 加入-杭州三秒聊探花(喜御姐少妇) 🎁 奖品内容: 💰️ 200元现金口令红包 × 5 ⚠️ 抽奖说明: 中奖者24内原价出击后联系 @HK818bot 领取限本人使用,不得转让出售,违者取消资格,取关取消资格。 📅 开奖日期:(北京时间) 2026年08月18日 11时18分00秒

2👍1🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 03:09 UTC≈4,880 views7 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

本期课程:体育课 教师:#知允 @wenzyun (3刷) 教学内容:倒立69(挑战100斤) 火车便当 壁咚..... 考试成绩:90分/💯 ——————————- 知允的身材真是操不够 纯骚纯骚的 评论区输入【 知允3 】自提 #出击 #外围 #杭州 #楼凤 狼友现金抽奖兑换群 @hzdadbaobao

4🔥2👍1

11 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC≈2,520 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

TG必备的搜索引擎,快搜kuai帮你发现有趣群组、频道、视频、音乐、电影、新闻 | Find cool stuff all in one bot! 机器人:@kuai @kuaia @kuaiaa 👉 https://t.me/kuai?start=a_1EI76P

11 Aug 2026, 06:14 UTC≈5,050 views11 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

推荐一枚成都的 “视频大网黄” 嫩妹 御姐 外围 会所 通吃 ✨ 喜欢拍黄色小视频✨ 他的频道进去就出不来啦! 点此查看部分作品 🔴 点此关注云长频道 🔴 云长刚回归 猛攻中…… 实事求是 不尬吹~ 云长出品必属精品🥇

5👍3🔥3

10 Aug 2026, 10:15 UTC359 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

TG必备的搜索引擎,快搜kuai帮你发现有趣群组、频道、视频、音乐、电影、新闻 | Find cool stuff all in one bot! 机器人:@kuai @kuaia @kuaiaa 👉 https://t.me/kuai?start=a_1EI76P

10 Aug 2026, 04:00 UTC≈5,480 views7 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🎟️ 抽奖标题:月光包养一周年纯福利活动 抽奖编号:TL178627868309 🎁 奖品内容: - 🧧 88(现金红包)*18 🪧 抽奖说明:达到条件的用户自动参与抽奖 额外提醒,现在加入会员群可以抽更多大奖福利甚至白嫖介绍费资格!!! ⚡️免介绍费x2(2个名额) 🧧1314x1(现金红包) 🧧520x1(现金红包) 🧧188x3(现金红包) 🧧88x5(现金红包) ⬆️会员群才能参与 🎫 参与条件: - 必须有用户名 - 从2026-08-10 00:00:00起发言数量不少于60 - 月票不少于60 - 加入频道:月光【全国包养】 - 加入群:月光包养交流群 ​🕒​ 开奖时间:2026-08-19 12:00自动开奖 🎰已参与人(2): 壹天天的 - 2026-08-10 00:41:57 禁欲(修身养性) - 2026-08-10 00:15:35

3👍2🔥2

9 Aug 2026, 05:57 UTC≈6,110 views11 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

DadVIP频道炸了 兄弟们稍安毋操 等我重建 再拉你们回来 哎真几把 累

9👍1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @lyfulishe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 272,698 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“®𝘿𝙖𝙙𝙏𝙑(杭州、上海)” (@lyfulishe), 60,638 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lyfulishe.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.