Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ®𝘿𝙖𝙙𝙏𝙑(杭州、上海)

Channel

®𝘿𝙖𝙙𝙏𝙑(杭州、上海)

@lyfulishe

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

75,406subscribers

+16,313 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003043636750
TypeChannel
Username@lyfulishe
Description杭州验牌官 出击指向灯 【大D全家桶 一键订阅 防止走丢】 https://t.me/addlist/DDD97ahjiwoyNTJk 【杭州狼友之家】 @dadpianyou 【杭州福利姬认证榜单】 @dadjingxuan 推广联系 | @dadbaobao 双向机器人 | @dadzhuli_bot 推特X | @dadbaobao
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/lyfulishe

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

59,09375,40667,249.56 August 2026 — 59,093 subscribers6 August 2026 — 59,112 subscribers7 August 2026 — 59,385 subscribers8 August 2026 — 59,617 subscribers9 August 2026 — 59,855 subscribers10 August 2026 — 60,019 subscribers11 August 2026 — 60,133 subscribers12 August 2026 — 60,234 subscribers14 August 2026 — 60,638 subscribers15 August 2026 — 61,022 subscribers17 August 2026 — 61,412 subscribers18 August 2026 — 61,640 subscribers19 August 2026 — 61,888 subscribers20 August 2026 — 62,158 subscribers21 August 2026 — 62,476 subscribers22 August 2026 — 62,898 subscribers24 August 2026 — 63,342 subscribers25 August 2026 — 63,603 subscribers26 August 2026 — 63,836 subscribers27 August 2026 — 64,147 subscribers28 August 2026 — 64,450 subscribers29 August 2026 — 64,726 subscribers30 August 2026 — 64,986 subscribers31 August 2026 — 65,338 subscribers1 September 2026 — 65,754 subscribers2 September 2026 — 65,982 subscribers3 September 2026 — 66,450 subscribers5 September 2026 — 67,206 subscribers8 September 2026 — 68,273 subscribers11 September 2026 — 69,244 subscribers13 September 2026 — 69,712 subscribers15 September 2026 — 70,368 subscribers17 September 2026 — 71,347 subscribers19 September 2026 — 72,561 subscribers26 September 2026 — 75,406 subscribers6 August 202626 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 51 days, net +16,313. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 56,646–77,853 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 17:3775,406+2,845
19 Sept 2026, 14:1972,561+1,214
17 Sept 2026, 00:0071,347+979
15 Sept 2026, 01:0070,368+656
13 Sept 2026, 07:1669,712+468
11 Sept 2026, 12:4269,244+971
8 Sept 2026, 20:5968,273+1,067
5 Sept 2026, 16:1767,206+756
3 Sept 2026, 14:4166,450+468
2 Sept 2026, 06:5365,982+228
1 Sept 2026, 08:0765,754+416
31 Aug 2026, 05:5465,338+352
30 Aug 2026, 04:3564,986+260
29 Aug 2026, 06:5464,726+276
28 Aug 2026, 08:1364,450+303
27 Aug 2026, 11:1364,147+311
26 Aug 2026, 09:2363,836+233
25 Aug 2026, 07:0763,603+261
24 Aug 2026, 07:3363,342+444
22 Aug 2026, 13:5262,898first reading

Engagement

119 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 142 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.26%
avg views ÷ 75,406 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,720
55 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.181%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
55
of 119 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 September 2026
Posts held119 (3 August 2026 – 29 September 2026)
Views total259,660
Reactions total469
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Sept 2026, 16:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
349
Videos
77
Links
199

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
4m 00s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 28 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

857 reactions across 112 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤56365.7%
👍15217.7%
🔥14016.3%
🍌10.117%
🎉10.117%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 113 of the 119 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 857 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 119 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
70
across the posts below
Posts paid on
68
of 119 we hold a reading for · 57%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lyfulishe. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 119 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 29 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Sept 2026, 08:41 UTC≈1,350 views8 reactions1 Starread 29 September 2026
Photo

💖💖推荐一家靠谱的高性价比包养福利平台!!!🎈🎈🎈 💋优质良家素人女大学生包养💖 ————战地记者 杭州站 靠谱包养 💋💋介绍费1000+,全网聊手费用最低价!💞💞💞 高性价比体验包养女大!感受出击老师完全不一样的体验,省去自己精力勾兑,一对一私车调教💋💋💋💋 优质妹子来自各种社交软件同学朋友介绍和聊手线下勾兑,平台保障交易安全,客服靠谱负责售后!🍓🍓🍓🍓 相中妹子再入会!会员群自由交流经验!会员等级还可折扣聊手费!🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉 成都站 https://t.me/zhandijizheCD 杭州站 https://t.me/zhandijizhe001 3️⃣号接待员📱 :@Thwj00002 2️⃣号接待员📱 : @thwj009

❤6👍1🔥1

29 Sept 2026, 08:37 UTC≈1,160 views8 reactions1 Starread 29 September 2026
Forwarded from @dadjingxuanPhoto

🙋🏻‍♀️ 花名:#糯糯 💌 联系:@nuonuoc 🍓 罩杯:A 💲 价格:900P 🏷 标签: #杭州 #嫩妹 #69 #甜妹 狼友验证报告 ⚡️大D 认证 @hzdadbaobao

❤6👍1🔥1

28 Sept 2026, 17:00 UTC≈2,020 views2 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

TG必备的搜索引擎,快搜kuai帮你发现有趣群组、频道、视频、音乐、电影、新闻 | Find cool stuff all in one bot! 机器人:@kuai @kuaia @kuaiaa 👉 https://t.me/kuai?start=a_1EI76P

❤2

28 Sept 2026, 04:17 UTC≈2,600 views8 reactions1 Starread 29 September 2026
Forwarded from @dadjingxuanPhoto

🙋🏻‍♀️ 花名:#小乖 (抓龙筋) 💌 联系:@XGzlj168 💲 价格:598 / 898 🏷 标签: #杭州 #嫩妹 #抓龙筋 #甜妹 #颜值 狼友验证报告 ⚡️ 水洗棉 ⚡️ 阿萨法 认证 @hzdadbaobao

❤6👍1🔥1

27 Sept 2026, 20:16 UTC≈3,020 views5 reactions1 Starread 29 September 2026
Photo

🎰 杭州高校 X 大D频道 联合抽奖 📮 参与条件: 🎫 加入-杭州福利姬 🎫 加入-®𝘿𝙖𝙙𝙏𝙑(杭州、上海) 🎫 加入-杭州高校(修车) └ 🎟️ 发言数大于 3 条 🎫 加入-杭州高校验证车库 🎁 奖品内容: 💰️ 188现金红包 × 3 ⚠️ 抽奖说明: 中奖者需24小时内完成兑奖 📅 开奖日期:(北京时间) 2026年10月04日 23时00分00秒

❤3👍1🔥1

26 Sept 2026, 15:58 UTC≈4,380 views11 reactions1 Starread 29 September 2026
Photo

👑资料 【艺名】#菲菲 🤣 【价格】800p 【位置】杭州上城区 【联系方式】 @frfr1126 😀【身材样貌】 1、人照8成 2、19岁 身高163左右,体重90,胸有b+ 3、肤色黄偏白 💕【态度服务】 1、妹子做过主播 身上有纹身 我挺喜欢的 2、口活一般还需调教 3、姿态低 配合度高 4、一个不错的嫩妹 性价比高 —————————————————— 大D作品【 菲菲1 】自提 🤣 #楼凤 #出击 #外围 #杭州 片友们福利讨论群 @hzdadbaobao 👈

❤8🔥2👍1

26 Sept 2026, 12:48 UTC≈3,860 views7 reactionsread 29 September 2026
Photo

杭州福利姬中秋特别抽奖第二期(限会员) 大D祝老师狼友中秋快乐 今日23点开奖 100红包x3 参与入口 输入【 抽奖 】 没上车的抓紧

❤5👍1🔥1

26 Sept 2026, 08:49 UTC≈3,920 views8 reactions1 Starread 29 September 2026
Photo

抽奖标题: 月光萝莉包养国庆福利大放送 抽奖编号:TL179040899730 🎁 奖品内容: - 88.88口令红包🧧*10 🪧 抽奖说明:参与需扣除20月票,红包私信 ccfun兑奖机器人,本活动召唤词:国庆, 开奖结果召唤词:开奖 违规水群 ,刷屏撤回,发现永久封禁 🎫 参与条件: - 必须有用户名 - 从2026-09-26 16:00:00起发言数量不少于26 - 月票不少于26 - 加入频道:月光【全国包养】 - 加入群:月光包养交流群 ​🕒​ 开奖时间:2026-10-05 12:26自动开奖 🎰已参与人(0):

❤6👍1🔥1

25 Sept 2026, 21:33 UTC≈4,230 views14 reactions1 Starread 29 September 2026
Photo

👑资料 【艺名】#沐婉 🤣 【价格】800p 【位置】杭州拱墅区 【联系方式】 @muwanbb 😀【身材样貌】 1、人照8成 2、18岁 身高165左右,体重95,胸有b+ 3、肤色黄偏白 💕【态度服务】 1、最近听闻口碑不错 今日一见身材确实有亮点 应该是梨型身材 胸不大 腰细 臀大非常翘 逼逼人工白虎 干净卫生无异味 2、服务态度很好 姿态低 3、最厉害的是会潮喷 整场潮喷了78次 而且水量大 力道猛 床上最后一片汪洋 4、目前我去过的潮喷老师中 质量最好 性价比最高 —————————————————— 无作品 #楼凤 #出击 #外围 #杭州 片友们福利讨论群 @hzdadbaobao 👈

❤12👍1🔥1

25 Sept 2026, 10:12 UTC≈3,970 views6 reactions1 Starread 29 September 2026
Video

🤪✅😀😃😄😀😀😀😀 🎉欢迎来到杭州《玖宫阁》SPA 🔞全区精品放心预约售后有保障 🍑全裸/5推/海选/油压/SPA/94 🐶多年团队 五星环境 颜值嫩妹 🍑私密安全 安全保障 明码标价 🍒方便停车 出入安全 一口落地 💕不需办卡 售后保障 精选质量 手推✅ 胸推✅ 足推✅ 臀推✅ 阴推✅ 海鲜✅ 助浴🏃‍♂️ 毒龙🏃‍♂️ 舌吻🏃‍♂️ 本群🈚️口🈚️进入式❌免开口 营业1️⃣4️⃣:0️⃣0️⃣~2️⃣:0️⃣0️⃣ 请确定好再预约🈲(鸽子勿扰) 预约点击: 玖宫阁预约客服 双向点击: 玖宫阁双向限制 进群点击: 玖宫阁讨论群组 选妃点击: 玖宫阁选妃频道 ———————————— 🏆余杭 上城 拱墅 西湖 钱塘 🏆富阳 临平 滨江 萧山 下沙 🏆全杭都可安排❤️欢迎下单

❤6

25 Sept 2026, 02:34 UTC≈3,840 views5 reactions1 Starread 29 September 2026
Video

🏆杭州中高端外围可上门-橙橙🏆 🎆 全杭覆盖(700-2500💰)🎆 ⏩客服 @su6357069 ⏩双向 @su6357069bot ➡️茶馆频道:https://t.me/chenchenchaguan1 ➡️茶馆群组:https://t.me/chenchenjiaoliuqun 🐴大圈/中圈/小圈/莞式 /🈚️T/学妹/洋酒/ 处nv/转运珠/3T/6T spa 🉑上门 🉑课室🉑包夜 🉑包天 🐴全国一二线城市大圈外围🏆活动价 #2300-2500p #一次一小时 🐴频道只做当日推荐, 具体需求可以咨询客服 ,靠谱推荐,满意为止!

❤3👍1🔥1

24 Sept 2026, 00:42 UTC≈5,150 views12 reactions1 Starread 29 September 2026
Photo

知允 @wenzyun 6刷 去过的都说骚 大D新作品 【 知允6 】自提 🤣 #楼凤 #出击 #外围 #杭州 片友们福利讨论群 @hzdadbaobao 👈 返回导航页

❤9🔥2👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 119 posts we hold for @lyfulishe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@lyfulishe edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
2 September 2026
Most recent edit
2 September 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“®𝘿𝙖𝙙𝙏𝙑(杭州、上海)” (@lyfulishe), 75,406 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lyfulishe.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.