Channel
@fljbg
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,534subscribers
+156 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003807018107 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fljbg |
| Created | 7 July 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fljbg |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:56 | 1,534 | +82 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:02 | 1,452 | +56 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:41 | 1,396 | +18 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 1,378 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:38 | 1,378 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (7 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,607 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 22:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
5 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
杭州福利姬：https://t.me/dadbaobao1 评分标准：6分﹣差 7分﹣及格 8分﹣良好 9分﹣优秀 10分﹣极品 【出击老师】：#妍妍(抓龙筋） @yanyan12888 【出击留名】： @catblue123123 【出击时间】：8月6日 【大概位置】：拱墅 【修车水费】：899 【人照相似】：人照相似程度90%，颜值好看，御姐熟女风，气质好 【身高身材】：身高162，腿又白又细，皮肤很好 【胸器罩杯】：罩杯C+，手感很好 【课室环境】：小区，停车方便，出入无门禁，房间很干净整洁 【个人卫生】：不抽烟，整个人香香的 【时间管理】：排课合理，不会催客 【服务点评】：服务很到位，手法很好，抓龙筋也能让你体会到欲仙欲死的感觉！爽翻了！ 【推荐程度】：9分 【服务流程】：一开门就看到一张甜甜的笑脸，两个酒窝好甜好美😍印象分满分💯！穿搭很有御姐气质，喜欢御姐的可以冲！姐姐不仅人长的好看，手法也是相当的好，力度把控的很…
杭州福利姬：https://t.me/dadbaobao1 评分标准：6分﹣差 7分﹣及格 8分﹣良好 9分﹣优秀 10分﹣极品 【出击老师】：贝贝 @zfj099 【出击留名】： @bfcdfwe 【出击时间】：8月4日 【大概位置】：拱墅区 【修车水费】：899 【人照相似】：人照9分，人照很符合 ，本人更好看 【身高身材】：169左右 腰臀比完美！ 【胸器罩杯】：C＋ 【课室环境】：小区好找 细心引导位置 【个人卫生】：干净卫生 ，有消毒 【时间管理】：安排合理 ，时间做满 【服务点评】：情绪价值拉满，值得二刷 【推荐程度】：9.9分 【流程细节】看到贝贝老师身材长相和符合我的胃口审美 ，一直知道老师不好约，今天刚好被我钻了空子，看到狼友们分享老师前高手法了得也确实没有体验过。满怀期待cj，课室在偏老的小区，明明是住宅 名叫公寓，环境也温馨 ，见到贝贝ls第一眼就很心动 ，有种初恋既视感 ，声音也特别温柔好听 ，挑…
杭州福利姬：https://t.me/dadbaobao1 评分标准：9分﹣优秀 【出击老师】：娇朵儿 【出击留名】：@hellohello1988 【出击时间】：8月3日 【大概位置】：拱墅区 【修车水费】：800p 【高端服务】：有的打 ✅ 没有的打 ❎ ① 舌吻 ✅ ② 六九 ✅ ③ 毒龙 ❎ 【人照相似】：人照9分，气质出众，为人很温柔 【身高身材】：身高165以上，腿长，无纹身大小，腰细屁股大 【胸器罩杯】：皮肤手感光滑 【湿度紧度】：很容易出水，反馈真实，高潮的时候还会颤抖 【课室环境】：小区，有无门禁 【个人卫生】：不抽烟，无异味，有陪浴，有浴巾，漱口刷牙，老师很重很重个人清洁 【时间管理】：不催，情绪价值拉满，很会说话 【服务点评】：值得二刷 【推荐程度】：9分 【流程细节】：不太会写哈，到了课室先聊一会儿，然后陪浴，还有水中箫，之后选择地方大战三百回合，老师女上很舒服，体力很好，很持久，也会夹，…
杭州福利姬：https://t.me/dadbaobao1 评分标准：6分﹣差 7分﹣及格 8分﹣良好 9分﹣优秀 10分﹣极品 【出击老师】：#贝贝 @@zfj099 【出击留名】：ggoo xixihaha 【出击时间】：8月2日 【大概位置】：拱墅 【修车水费】：899 【高端服务】：有的打 ✅ 没有的打 ❎ ① 舌吻 ❎ ② 六九 ❎ ③ 毒龙 ❎ 【人照相似】：人照8分，颜值9.5分 【身高身材】：身高168左右.无纹身 【胸器罩杯】：罩杯B，饱满型 【湿度紧度】：户型毛发，紧度湿度，做爱反馈 【课室环境】：小区/停车方便，出入有门禁比较宽松 【个人卫生】：无抽烟，无陪浴，有浴巾/漱口水/牙刷 【时间管理】：排课比较宽松，时间充足 【服务点评】：颜值顶呱呱，清纯与性感相结合，服务不摸鱼划水 【推荐程度】：9分 【流程细节】：因为老师频道内容比较少，所以有点开盲盒的体验。进门老师穿了一身墨绿旗袍非常显身材…
杭州福利姬：https://t.me/dadbaobao1 评分标准：6分﹣差 7分﹣及格 8分﹣良好 9分﹣优秀 10分﹣极品 【出击老师】：#妍妍(抓龙筋） @yanyan12888 【出击留名】： @hqbz66 【出击时间】：8月2日 【大概位置】：拱墅 【修车水费】：899 【人照相似】：人照8分，很有少妇韵味儿，小脸蛋，皮肤白皙，穿搭御姐风，两个小酒窝笑起来又是甜甜的 【身高身材】：身高162，无纹身，皮肤很光滑 【胸器罩杯】：罩杯C+ 【课室环境】：小区，停车方便，出入无门禁 【个人卫生】：不抽烟 【时间管理】：排课合理，不会催客，情绪价值管够 【服务点评】：手法很好，轻柔力度适中，循序渐进，潮喷和前高做的非常爽 【推荐程度】：9分
杭州福利姬：https://t.me/dadbaobao1 的 评分标准：6分﹣差 7分﹣及格 8分﹣良好 9分﹣优秀 10分﹣极品 【出击老师】：#贝贝（抓龙筋） @zfj099 【出击留名】： @hz_4959 【出击时间】：8月1日 【大概位置】: 拱墅 【修车水费】：899 【人照相似】：本人比照片好看 【身高身材】：1.68左右 【胸器罩杯】：C 【课室环境】： 小区 方便找 【个人卫生】：干净 香香软软 【时间管理】：安排的很满 享受即可 【服务点评】：来之前，贝贝算是精挑细选的出击对象了也担心踩雷 去过很多家 每去新的地方总有一种高期待值贝贝是唯一一个让我感觉眼前一亮的那种 反差感很重 白月光即视感 情商高会说话 声音也好听 对于我这种老玩家来说属于半开发状态 假以时日绝对是位满姐 ，接下来会是常客。 【推荐程度】：10分
杭州福利姬：https://t.me/dadbaobao1 评分标准：6分﹣差 7分﹣及格 8分﹣良好 9分﹣优秀 10分﹣极品 【出击老师】：#贝贝（抓龙筋） @zfj099 【出击留名】：@hellohello1988 【出击时间】：8月1日 【大概位置】：拱墅 【修车水费】：899 【人照相似】：人照9分，高颜值网红脸，气质不俗 【身高身材】：身材高挑168，无纹身 【胸器罩杯】：罩杯B+ 【课室环境】：小区，停车方便，出入无门禁 【个人卫生】：贝贝很干净，不抽烟，全身香香的 【时间管理】：排课合理，一点儿也不催，很会聊天，情绪价值管够，不是那种很E的，但是非常会接话，不会冷场 【服务点评】：优点就是颜值即正义，太好看了，古风美女，看着很嫩，有酒窝，光颜值就能顶899 【推荐程度】：9分
杭州福利姬：https://t.me/dadbaobao1 评分标准：6分﹣差 7分﹣及格 8分﹣良好 9分﹣优秀 10分﹣极品 【出击老师】：你的小妈@ggjete002 【出击留名】：virt 【出击时间】：7.21 【大概位置】：上城 【修车水费】：下午茶 【高端服务】：有的打 ✅ 没有的打 ❎ ① 舌吻 ✅ ② 六九 ✅ ③ 毒龙 ✅ 【人照相似】：人照几分，颜值脸型，穿搭气质 9分 【身高身材】：身高腿长，纹身大小，腰腹描述 气质 【胸器罩杯】：罩杯胸型，乳头颜色，皮肤手感 不大不小 【湿度紧度】：户型毛发，紧度湿度，做爱反馈 很润 【课室环境】：小区/公寓，停车是否方便，出入有无门禁很方便 【个人卫生】：有无抽烟，不抽烟有无陪浴，有无浴巾/漱口水/牙刷✅ 【时间管理】：排课是否合理，有无催客赶客，有无情绪价值✅ 【服务点评】：简述优缺点，价格是否合理，是否值得二刷✅ 【推荐程度】：100 【流程细节】…
❤5
杭州福利姬：https://t.me/dadbaobao1 评分标准：9分﹣优秀 【出击老师】：#喷潮阳阳 @CCBB521 【出击留名】：vincent。@vincent0119 【出击时间】：7月6日 【大概位置】：上城区九堡附近 【修车水费】：800pp 【高端服务】：有的打 ✅ 没有的打 ❎ ① 舌吻 ❎ ② 六九 ❎ ③ 毒龙 ❎ 【人照相似】：人照 9 分，颜值偏御姐，穿衣显瘦，脱衣有肉 【身高身材】：身高 170左右，纹身小手臂一处，腰上没什么赘肉哦 【胸器罩杯】：C 罩杯，乳头褐红颜色，皮肤偏白的，手感嫩呢 【湿度紧度】：蝴蝶户型、人工白虎，紧度尚可湿度水多多，做爱反馈一直娇喘嘤嘤嘤 【课室环境】：小区停车方便，出入无门禁 【个人卫生】：有抽烟（上课的时候不抽），有陪浴，有一次性浴巾 【时间管理】：排课合理，没有催客赶客，情绪价值健谈聊的开心 【服务点评】：老师优点：自聊老师人工白虎，课表服务都…
Channel photo updated
Channel created
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @fljbg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 813,208 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“杭州福利姬报告频道” (@fljbg), 1,534 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fljbg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.