Channel
@cddj88
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
24,236subscribers
+1,018 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002220928961 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cddj88 |
| Description | 人体扫描仪，指引出击方向 联系云长： @yccj88 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cddj88 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:33 | 24,236 | +1,018 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:00 | 23,218 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:51 | 23,218 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (29 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 124,690 |
| Reactions total | 209 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 22:38 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
209 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 192 | 91.9% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 5.26% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 2.87% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 209reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cddj88. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 7 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
【武圣✦关云长✦讨逆战报】 ————逆贼 ✦ 情报 ———— 【敌将✦姓名】： #名仕荟半套 【逆贼✦旗号】：@cdxooo 【讨伐✦悬赏】： 500+20（一次性浴巾） 【会战✦地点】：#四川 #成都 #青羊区 #中坝 【敌将✦形体】：160，胸A，乳头较大，乳晕褐色，26左右，95-100斤，颜值清纯良家感 【敌将✦武艺】： 莞式服务95（这次兄弟们听声音） ———— 武圣 ✦ 总结 ———— 【单骑✦驱驰】：云长不仅出击爱爱，也会被动享受，昨晚喝完酒太疲乏了，找个半套躺着享受，到达现场，环境还不错，借着酒劲开始欲火中烧，兄弟们这里一定要预约红牌，客服给了一些红牌号，只有555空，本想体验333，看频道介绍更适合我 进门第一刻，良家感，不是浓妆艳抹，脱光，被她牵着二弟走到一旁，洗的非常认真，她为我搓洗干净，她舔了舔嘴角，边洗我的工具，不自觉冒出呻吟，整个陪洗过程，一直都肃然起敬 为我擦干之后，她…
❤18🥰6
Telegram必备的搜索引擎，极搜JISOU帮你精准找到，想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_1397841808
❤3
【武圣✦关云长✦讨逆战报】 ————逆贼 ✦ 情报 ———— 【敌将✦姓名】： #果儿 【逆贼✦旗号】： @meili20241 【讨伐✦悬赏】： 600p 【会战✦地点】：#四川 #成都 #武侯区 #高新区 #世纪城 【敌将✦形体】：人照8.5，身高165左右，皮肤白，体重不到100斤，胸c，乳头乳晕褐色，乳头花生大小 【敌将✦武艺】： 陪洗，水中萧，ab面，胸推，口，毒龙，大蟒蛇 ———— 武圣 ✦ 总结 ———— 【单骑✦驱驰】：什么？昨天我被秒了？哈哈哈是的，云长再次出击成都名师，预约，见面大蟒蛇，陪洗，水中萧，擦干开始背面服务，太爽了，舌头的功力，继续a面服务，女上，传教士，这次多了俩分钟，下次再接再厉 【军势✦评级】：校尉 将军(极品)、都尉(少见的精品)、校尉(值得回锅)、千夫长(值得打卡)、百夫长(良品)、什长(及格) 【武圣✦批注】：颜值中上，服务多，白皮，性价比高，不催课，缺点暂无（个人原…
❤26👍2
【武圣✦关云长✦讨逆战报】 ————逆贼 ✦ 情报 ———— 【敌将✦姓名】： #梦小乔 【逆贼✦旗号】： @SHUNL7 【讨伐✦悬赏】： 800p 【会战✦地点】：#四川 #成都 #武侯区益州大道 【敌将✦形体】：165，95斤，胸c，乳头乳晕褐色，乳头花生大小，皮肤白，bb外褐内粉 【敌将✦武艺】： 水中萧，毒龙，舌吻，陪洗，口，69，舔咪咪，单p只有A面服务，是掰开大腿正面毒 ———— 武圣 ✦ 总结 ———— 【单骑✦驱驰】：进门，好妖艳的长相，妩媚，皮肤白，有气质，接着抽支烟，开始进入前奏，脱掉陪洗，一起漱口，情趣服装，在服务车里很爱干净，没有异味，享受着69，到口舔咪咪，舌吻，然后掰开大腿正面毒龙，因为只约了单p，所以没有b面服务，舌头好软，女上感觉到bb在吸，兄弟们对不起，我直接被123秒了 【军势✦评级】：千夫长 将军(极品)、都尉(少见的精品)、校尉(值得回锅)、千夫长(值得打卡)、百夫长(…
❤26
【武圣✦关云长✦讨逆战报】 ————逆贼 ✦ 情报 ———— 【敌将✦姓名】： #阿狸 【逆贼✦旗号】： 老师岸了，故不放车牌 【讨伐✦悬赏】： 800p（报告返一） 【会战✦地点】：#成都 #高新区心岛 【敌将✦形体】：26左右，身上有纹身，身高172，120斤以内，屁股大，大腿肉多，乳头花生大小，乳头乳晕褐色，bb褐色 【敌将✦武艺】： 陪洗，口，舔咪咪，亲嘴，69，爱爱 ———— 武圣 ✦ 总结 ———— 【单骑✦驱驰】：配合度高，屁股与腰线视觉属于巨臀，奶子科技，颜值中上，后入的时候视觉效果拉爆了 【军势✦评级】：百夫长 将军(极品)、都尉(少见的精品)、校尉(值得回锅)、千夫长(值得打卡)、百夫长(良品)、什长(及格) 【武圣✦批注】：唯一缺点脸不胖，大腿肉多，但胜在屁股大，有颜值 【战役✦记录】：点击跳转福利视频链接
❤43
【武圣✦关云长✦讨逆战报】 ————逆贼 ✦ 情报 ———— 【敌将✦姓名】： #安欣 【逆贼✦旗号】： @CDdashixiong 【讨伐✦悬赏】： 2500pp 【会战✦地点】：#成都上门 【敌将✦形体】：160-165左右身高，25-26岁之间，胸B，乳头粉褐色，乳晕小，人照相似度9分，视频显脸大，实际真人巴掌脸，bb褐色 【敌将✦武艺】： 浴缸泡澡，陪洗，口，舔咪咪，爱聊天，做 ———— 武圣 ✦ 总结 ———— 【单骑✦驱驰】：出击了老师换换口味，预约外围，翻了一下围子频道，看到一个视频，颜值纯御系，果断预约，见面一身绿旗袍，微笑自信的走到我眼前，全程不尬聊，安欣果然很安心，很有女友感，不流程化，接着放水准备来个泡澡式调情，接着口，到床上口，舔咪咪，舌吻，插进去已水汪汪，开始爱爱，反馈不错，女友感的话痨，不会冷场 【军势✦评级】：千夫长 将军(极品)、都尉(少见的精品)、校尉(值得回锅)、千夫长(值得…
❤29
【武圣✦关云长✦讨逆战报】 ————逆贼 ✦ 情报 ———— 【敌将✦姓名】： #琳琳 【逆贼✦旗号】： @lin17840 【讨伐✦悬赏】： 700p 【会战✦地点】：#四川 #成都 #武侯区高升桥 【敌将✦形体】：24左右，162，95-100斤，胸大自然，乳头凹，乳头乳晕褐色，bb外褐内粉 【敌将✦武艺】： 陪洗，口，舔咪咪，69，爱爱 ———— 武圣 ✦ 总结 ———— 【单骑✦驱驰】：颜值可以，身材可以，皮肤偏暗，态度好，胸大自然，左乳头凹，配合度高，口活可以，爱爱反馈好 【军势✦评级】：千夫长 将军(极品)、都尉(少见的精品)、校尉(值得回锅)、千夫长(值得打卡)、百夫长(良品)、什长(及格) 【武圣✦批注】：缺点皮肤偏暗，无舌吻，颜值高 【战役✦记录】：点击跳转福利视频链接
❤47👍9
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @cddj88. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 288,975 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“成都云长 《出击录》” (@cddj88), 24,236 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cddj88.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.