Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

lt.crypto | NFT

@ltcryptoNFT

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

84subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001747184940
TypeChannel
Username@ltcryptoNFT
DescriptionWEB 3.0 привет
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/ltcryptoNFT

Growth

847 August 2026 — 84 subscribers9 August 2026 — 84 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 83–85 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 17:1784no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:5784first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 17 August 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 December 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
18
Links
140

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

62 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2337.1%
👍2032.3%
😁812.9%
🤣46.45%
💯34.84%
💊23.23%
🤔23.23%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 17 August 2023 to 15 December 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Dec 2023, 11:49 UTC455 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Я рестарчу паблик и меняю подход. Если вам всё еще интересно то, что я пишу, хочется больше конструктивных мыслей, инфо о всех событиях, стоящих внимания и качественной структуризации - все дороги ведут сюда - https://t.me/Memoir0x

🔥4

Signed lilTAT

7 Dec 2023, 20:53 UTC519 viewsread 9 August 2026

вьебал весь балик в л0 потому что читал слитую переписку сео дао на связи?

Signed lilTAT

1 Dec 2023, 18:59 UTC535 viewsread 9 August 2026

https://airdrop.jup.ag смотрим на пиццу

Signed lilTAT

1 Dec 2023, 13:09 UTC326 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Старкнет snapshot confirmed. Вопрос - как будет проведена раздача, если: 1. Они не знают как брить сибилов, не согласны и не уверены в решениях прошлых дропов (в частности, ARB) - исходя из информации с конференции, а критерии еще не готовы 2. Условный снепшот летом выбривает огромное кол-во юзеров, а снепшот в дату слива выглядит, в каком-то смысле, вынужденным решением. 3. ТГЕ должен был произойти в апреле, опирая

👍1

Signed lilTAT

23 Nov 2023, 09:32 UTC248 viewsread 9 August 2026

Держу вкурсе твл уже не 123кк$, а 260кк$, и это даже недели не прошло. Можно смело резать цифры еще на 2. (Забыл подчеркнуть, что 1,5-3x расчитаны на лоу банк без реф лестницы и лаки спина. Реф лестницу, конечно, может сделать каждый, а лаки спин не учитывался вообще.)

Signed lilTAT

22 Nov 2023, 16:21 UTC236 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

1,5-3х за холд до февраля. Как будто проще сделать еще пачку акков в скролл + начать делать линею даже со второй недели + еще для усреднения (цифра зависит от депозита) аккичей в старкнет и зк запихнуть. Вы главное поверьте админам каналов, что это новый лайфчейндж и что они взяли кредит для этого проекта. Тем кто трезво оценил возможности, или даже делится % с аудиторией - уважение, жаль что таких людей осталось ма

👍7🔥1🤔1

Signed lilTAT

22 Nov 2023, 16:16 UTC213 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

На Blast airdrop за стейкинг выделено 5%. Сейчас застейкнуто 123кк$ - они поделят между собой эти 5%. Оценка фдв по инвест прайсу - 1 лярд. Сколько может быть оценка на выходе? 4-6-8 лярдов, там уже не угадать ввиду новизны в подходе и состояния рынка. Получается, что на 123кк$ вложенных в стейкинг раздадут 5%*4-6-8ккк = от 200кк$ до 400кк$. При этом каждый доллар даст ВАМ меньше, чем доллар вашего акка-реферала, н

🔥6👍1

Signed lilTAT

13 Nov 2023, 07:28 UTC217 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

https://zora.co/collect/zora:0xf3fe130700b20d26e3e599a131717e335b751c4c/4 очередная

🔥1

Signed lilTAT

12 Nov 2023, 11:01 UTC202 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

как же я люблю технологии вот эти все старкнет там и так далее

😁4🔥1

Signed lilTAT

2 Nov 2023, 00:11 UTC300 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Можете меня поздравить, я закончил откручивать л0 в 23:57 UTC 31 октября, написал брайану, чтобы он паузил доту и делал снепшот. А теперь пора пройтись по лучшему л2 среди тир1.5-2. Zora Вообще не поздно, блокчейн родился в июне, тыкнув пальцем в небо, можно предположить, что могли бы докинуть за ранние минты до создания бч. Я не буду писать базу, которую сейчас рассказывает даже самый бездарный админ самого бездарн

🔥3👍1

Signed lilTAT

27 Oct 2023, 16:35 UTC232 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Чек админа на дауна - пост с ссылкой на старгейт аирдроп с подписью блин что же это такое...???? (???DROP????))

😁4

Signed lilTAT

20 Oct 2023, 00:57 UTC255 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @earlyberkut

ФАРМИНГ $MEME СТАРТОВАЛ 🤑 Я думаю что это лучшее событие с минимальными вложениями за последнюю тысячу лет! Делайте задания, лутайте поинты, богатейте - все просто Ссылка: https://www.memecoin.org/farming В задании "Referred by a friend?" указывайте моего капитана 3222 и лутайте дополнительные поинты. Среди моих подписчиков, которые введут мой код разыграю часть профита с рефералки. Early Berkut | Telegram | Deb

👍2

Signed lilTAT

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ltcryptoNFT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,053,072 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“lt.crypto | NFT” (@ltcryptoNFT), 84 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ltcryptoNFT.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.