Channel
@Memoir0x
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
86subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002049758539 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Memoir0x |
| Description | Записки о web3 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Memoir0x |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:33 | 86 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 86 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (25 December 2025 – 27 July 2026) |
| Views total | 125 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 16:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
42 reactions across 14 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 42 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 December 2025 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Стакан забалансили, теперь гавном воняет, лимитки съедает с огромным спредом от реальной цены, из-за чего без лудоманских открытий встать в позу дешевле просто по маркету, но по маркету в стакане приходится собирать пыль и по моим прикидкам треть комсы от силы отбить можно спредом, но в любой момент фандинг может не плохо задушить. На прошлой неделе мне насыпали 40 М-поинтов за 120 баксов потраченной комсы, и 50 осн…
👍1
Начал отрабатывать Perpl - очередной перп декс с не плохим потенциалом по ряду причин: - Есть прошлогодний раунд на 9,5M$ с лидом Dragonfly и кучкой тир-3 фондов. - Сейчас идёт ивент на раздачу до 1M$ в монад токенах, длится будет 16 недель, по 50к М-поинтов (еще 200к М-поинтов через коллабы, ивенты и прочее). Должно не плохо срезать траты. - Довольно часто проводят турики на 100к баксов, 2 дня назад начался новый,…
👍1
TGE Extended близко. Будет 70 лямов поинтов, на них 30% дропа, которые и обещали, причем уже давно они уменьшают недельные раздачи поинтов, чтобы в эти 70 лямов уложиться - в общем выглядит рукопожатно. Анонснули инвест с мусорными фондами для хоть какого-то хайпа, ибо последние несколько месяцев метрики падают. Aspecta предиктит 300 лямов фдв, на полике ставка на 300 лямов FDV имеет шансы 50/50. Вроде на пару-тро…
в итоге взял Hibachi вместе с Extended. Вот тейки почему: - Стиль насыпки поинтов примерно одинаковый. Я уже писал что Extended любит ордера длиной в сутки на не огромный объём и сыпит за это больше всего. У Hibachi ситуация примерно такая-же. Брать Variational в паре к одному или другому не так удобно, там любят холд позиций на всю неделю. - Hibachi для Arc - это буквально Nado для Ink. Об этом просто не так актив…
Всем выжившим здарова, решил просто вкинуть как дела обстоят на рыночке, а то последний пост 2 месяца назад был. Из актуального для работы: Предикшны - Polymarket и Predict.Fun/Kalshi для хеджа поз. По Полику поконкретнее - наверное это один из немногих проектов, где железобетонно будет высокая оценка без грязных ММ-мувов или с ними, с лоу-циркулейтом и без него, с дропом в 5% или в 10%. Всякой всячины под критери…
👍4
Почекайте почты кто когда-то оформлял себе соланафон - мне пришло письмо с просьбой либо поменять адрес, либо получить рефанд. Разумеется, я выбрал рефанд, он идет пару недель как там написано, кост 0$.
Backpack решил ебануть ревериф для всех. Стратегия с бейз-ревардом отлетает, как у меня, так и, предполагаю, у абсолютного большинства, ибо устраивать поиски индусов либо просто невозможно, либо очень затратно. Надо просто лицом посветить, пройдите селфи по кнопочке, появилась у всех на сайте сверху. Обидно что я 5к поинтов на не свой акк набубенил, благо вовремя опомнился и начал фармить на свой, надеюсь РФ не поб…
На прошлой неделе был твит, в котором они пишут о том, что отказались от раунда 30M с FDV 300M. Звучит буллиш. Я просто верю что в конце лета - сентябре рынок будет лучше чем сейчас и они покажут 500M FDV и поинт по 2 бакса. При такой математике сейчас выходит около 500% годовых с идеальной ловлей спреда. Да, это не положил и забыл на неделю, как на Variational, перекладывать надо в течение всей недели, но тем не ме…
👍2
Backpack Exchange Looking To Raise $50M At A $1B Valuation Whilst Claiming To Have Made Over $100M In 2025 - Polymarket Odds Give A 29% Chance Of It Sustaining A $1B Valuation After TGE: Axios 🔗 velo.xyz
хм
👍1
На этой неделе Extended срезал поинты вдвое. Не знаю, поменяли ли формулу распределения, или это из-за роста метрик, но еще пару таких "делений пополам" и впринципе можно на проект забить хуй. Только месяц на чилле пофармил, буквально в конце декабря в 3 раза больше сыпало.
👍2
Backpack анонснул пре-тге ивент где 40 лямов поинтов раздадут в течение 4 недель + на тге будет 24% от тотал сапплая на поинт-холдеров. Про ивент нечего расписывать - покрутить немного можно, по факту это буквально еще один мини-сезон, в котором раздадут не новые поинты, а поинты, которые заберут у сибилов при чистке. А вот 24% на тге новость достаточно буллиш. Я хз как можно было быть уверенным, что они раздадут т…
👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Memoir0x. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,221,839 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мемуар об отрицательных иксах” (@Memoir0x), 86 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Memoir0x.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.