Channel
@lsapp2en
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
749subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002373197436 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lsapp2en |
| Description | Useful tips, articles and guides on working with Linken Sphere 2 anti-detect in English. Official website: http://ls.app Developer channel: t.me/lscrew User chat: t.me/lsapp |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lsapp2en |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 749 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:48 | 749 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (17 November 2025 – 27 July 2026) |
| Views total | 763 |
| Reactions total | 48 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
276 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 109 | 39.5% | |
| 👍 | 83 | 30.1% | |
| 🔥 | 72 | 26.1% | |
| 🤔 | 6 | 2.17% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 0.725% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.362% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.362% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.362% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.362% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 276reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 November 2025 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⚙️ When is a cheap domain a smart choice — and when is it a trap? For PBNs, disposable landing pages, and short-term tests, grabbing a domain for $1 makes perfect sense. The project probably won’t last a year, so the renewal price doesn’t really matter. But with a long-term brand project, it’s a completely different story. Over 5–10 years, renewals can account for 95–98% of everything you spend on the domain. 🔗 We…
👍5❤4🔥4🤔1
📱 App Rental Services for Affiliate Marketing: 5 Options Worth Checking Out WebView apps and PWAs have become essential tools for running traffic in gambling and other verticals. Building your own apps takes time, a dedicated team, and a solid budget, so most media buyers prefer renting ready-to-use solutions. At the same time, the market changes constantly: apps get blocked, some services shut down, and new provid…
👍7❤5🔥5
🧩 Affiliate marketing isn’t one single niche — it includes many different verticals, each with its own audience, rules, challenges, and campaign strategies. Finance, dating, nutra, gambling, e-commerce — they all work differently. If you’re just getting started, understanding these differences is an important first step before choosing an offer and launching your first campaign. 🔗 In this article, we break down the…
❤7👍5🔥5
📱 A private mobile proxy can cost anywhere from $50 to $120 per month. But if you already have a smartphone with a mobile data plan, you can cut those costs by turning your phone into your own proxy server. 🔗 In the article, we cover practical ways to set up a proxy on Android and iOS — from simple free apps to professional solutions.
👍7🔥6❤5
❌ New ad account, first campaign, instant ban — a familiar story for many beginner media buyers. The problem is that a fresh profile often looks exactly like what platforms don’t want to see: no history, no natural behavior, no trust signals, just an immediate attempt to launch ads. That’s why account farming matters. Before running serious campaigns, a profile should look like a real user: isolated from other acco…
👍7❤5🔥5
📩 Email accounts are still an important part of working with ad accounts, online services, and multi-accounting. But the market has changed a lot: high-quality emails are harder to find, and the requirements for infrastructure have become much higher. 🔗 In the article, we break down how the email account market works today, which types of emails are commonly used, what affects their price, and why stable work depend…
❤8👍6🔥5
🕵️♂️ Incognito mode and VPN are not anti-detect Beginners often think that using a VPN and opening a new incognito window is enough for multi-accounting. But websites see much more than just your IP: browser fingerprint, cookies, WebRTC, time zone, and other parameters. That’s why accounts can still be linked together and blocked. 🔗 In this article, we explain how a regular browser differs from an anti-detect bro…
❤8👍8🔥6
🤔 Can you trust free anti-detect browsers? The short answer: sometimes — but mostly for testing. If you need stable account work, free tools can be too risky. What looks like a small saving at first can end up costing much more than a proper subscription. 🔗 In the article, we break down where free solutions usually fail: outdated browser cores, inconsistent fingerprints, data leaks, and the risk of malware.
👍8❤6🔥6
🛡 Why Are Proxies Blocked? Buying private proxies doesn’t automatically earn trust from Google, Facebook, or other platforms. Modern anti-bot systems evaluate IP reputation much more deeply than most users realize. 🔗 In this article, we break down what an IP Fraud Score is, how spam databases affect proxy performance, and why even fresh IPs can end up restricted.
❤8🔥6👍5
❌ Common Mistakes When Using Anti-Detect Browsers An anti-detect browser helps build a stable infrastructure for multi-accounting, but it doesn’t guarantee full protection from bans on its own. If you ignore basic session logic, network hygiene, and the quality of your accounts, proxies, and other resources, the risk of getting blocked remains high. 🔗 We’ve put together a checklist of the most common mistakes that …
👍6🔥6❤4😁1
📊 Website Scraping: A Step-by-Step Guide Automated data collection has become an essential part of market analysis, but modern websites actively protect themselves from bots using Cloudflare, behavioral filters, and other anti-scraping systems. 🔗 We’ve prepared a step-by-step guide on how to set up scraping without blocks, imitate real user behavior, and properly integrate an antidetect browser into the process.
❤5👍5🤔3🔥2🤯1
Perfect screen organization with Snap We’ve often heard from you about a frustrating routine: when launching multiple sessions, the screen quickly turns into a chaotic pile of windows. They overlap, get in the way, and force you to waste valuable time resizing and arranging everything manually. 🔗 In our new article, we explain how Snap works — a new intelligent system for automatically arranging browser windows.
❤6👍5🤔2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lsapp2en. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 153,537 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Anti-detect Linken Sphere - useful tips” (@lsapp2en), 749 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lsapp2en.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.