Channel
@lmamhusainorg
On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
76,560subscribers
-2,740 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001306842109 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lmamhusainorg |
| Description | الحساب الرسمي |
| Created | 12 August 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 65 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lmamhusainorg |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 4 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @imamhussain_ar/3783510 Sept 2026, 16:02 UTC | @lmamhusainorg/7093 · this entry10 Sept 2026, 16:37 UTC | 0.99 | 35 minutes |
| @imamhussain_ar/3797821 Sept 2026, 08:28 UTC | @lmamhusainorg/7095 · this entry21 Sept 2026, 08:47 UTC | 0.99 | 19 minutes |
| @imamhussain_ar/3849227 Oct 2026, 16:03 UTC | @lmamhusainorg/7099 · this entry27 Oct 2026, 16:12 UTC | 0.99 | 9 minutes |
| @imamhussain_ar/3828513 Oct 2026, 08:00 UTC | @lmamhusainorg/7098 · this entry13 Oct 2026, 08:01 UTC | 0.99 | 72 seconds |
| @imamhussain_ar/385411 Nov 2026, 08:04 UTC | @lmamhusainorg/7100 · this entry1 Nov 2026, 08:17 UTC | 0.98 | 13 minutes |
| @imamhussain_ar/3866811 Nov 2026, 08:00 UTC | @lmamhusainorg/7102 · this entry11 Nov 2026, 11:14 UTC | 0.98 | 3.2 hours |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @imamhussain_ar | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.99 | 13 minutes | @imamhussain_ar (6–0) |
| @lmamhussainorg | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.99 | under a minute | this entry (3–2) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 8 of the 8 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 29 comparable posts for this entry, running 30 March 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 4 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @Quranorgg. That channel is not among the channels listed above, so this entry may share no posts with it and this does not say where this entry’s content came from. It is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 4 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Nov 2026, 03:48 | 76,560 | -31 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 20:01 | 76,591 | -27 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 07:16 | 76,618 | -35 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 20:40 | 76,653 | -40 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 20:27 | 76,693 | -10 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 21:20 | 76,703 | -9 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 21:35 | 76,712 | -23 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 22:24 | 76,735 | -6 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 23:44 | 76,741 | -37 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 21:39 | 76,778 | -40 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 21:27 | 76,818 | -33 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 22:51 | 76,851 | -41 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 20:01 | 76,892 | -11 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 21:02 | 76,903 | -45 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 16:36 | 76,948 | -31 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 15:55 | 76,979 | -27 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 16:28 | 77,006 | -21 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 13:07 | 77,027 | -23 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 10:36 | 77,050 | -26 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 11:57 | 77,076 | first reading |
30 posts held, back to 30 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 203 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 30 (30 March 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 92,600 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Nov 2026, 07:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 4 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
من أجوبة الاستفتاءات لموقع مكتب سماحة المرجع الديني الأعلى سماحة السيد علي الحسيني السيستاني (دام ظلّه) (الذكر في الصلاة) السؤال: هل يكفي في ذكر الركوع والسجود في الصلوات المستحبة قول سبحان الله مرة واحدة؟ الجواب: لا يكفي على الأحوط. #الصلاة #السيد_السيستاني
أعلنَ مكتبُ سماحة السيد السيستاني (دام ظلّه) في النجف الأشرف أن يوم غدٍ الأربعاء هو المكمّل لشهر جمادى الأولى، ويوم الخميس الموافق (١٢-١١-٢٠٢٦ م) هو الأول من شهر جمادى الآخرة لعام ١٤٤٨ للهجرة، ونسألكم الدعاء . #السيد_السيستاني
من أجوبة الاستفتاءات لموقع مكتب سماحة المرجع الديني الأعلى سماحة السيد علي الحسيني السيستاني (دام ظلّه) (حضور القلب في الصلاة) السؤال: ما معنى حضور القلب اللازم أثناء الصلاة؟ الجواب: معناه أن يُقبل المصلي بقلبه إلى الله تعالى ولا يشغله بأمر الدنيا، وهو معتبر في قبول الصلاة. #الصلاة #السيد_السيستاني
سؤال وجواب من مركز الأبحاث العقائدية برعاية مكتب المرجع الديني الأعلى سماحة السيد علي الحسيني السيستاني (دام ظلّه) (عصمة السيدة الزهراء عليها السلام) السؤال: المعروف أن العصمة تعطى من قبل الله للإنسان المكلف بتبليغ الأحكام و هداية الناس و إرشادهم سواء كان نبياً أو إماماً وعليه، ما الحكمة من عصمة السيدة الزهراء (صلوات الله و سلامه عليها) وهي غير مكلفة بمثل هذه المهمة؟ الإجابة: بالنسبة لعصمة السيدة الزهراء (عليها ال…
😎من أجوبة الاستفتاءات لموقع مكتب سماحة المرجع الديني الأعلى سماحة السيد علي الحسيني السيستاني (دام ظلّه) (حكم النسيان في الصلاة) السؤال: ما حكم من نسي سجدة واحدة وتذكرها بعد الدخول في الركوع؟ الجواب: يجب قضاؤها بعد الصلاة، والأحوط لزوماً أن يكون بعد صلاة الاحتياط إذا كانت عليه، وكذا إذا نسي سجدة واحدة والتشهد من الركعة الأخيرة ولم يذكر إلا بعد التسليم والإتيان بما ينافي الصلاة عمداً وسهواً. #السيد_السيستاني #الصل…
😎أعلنَ مكتبُ سماحة السيد السيستاني (دام ظلّه الوارف) في النجف الأشرف، أنّ يوم غدٍ الاثنين هو المكمّل لشهر ربيع الآخر، ويوم الثلاثاء الموافق (١٣-١٠-٢٠٢٦م) هو الأوّل من شهر جمادى الأولى لعام ١٤٤٨ للهجرة، ونسألكم الدعاء. #السيد_السيستاني #المرجعية_الدينية https://t.me/lmamhusainorg
😎بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم إنا لله وإنا إليه راجعون إن رحيل المرجع الكبير فقيه أهل بيت العصمة والطهارة (عليهم السلام) آية الله الحاج السيد موسى الشبيري الزنجاني (رضوان الله عليه) مصيبة مؤلمة وخسارة عظيمة. قد كان الفقيد الجليل ـ الذي أمضى كل عمره المبارك في سبيل التحقيق والتعليم ـ من كبار العلماء الأعلام، ومن أساطين الحوزة العلمية المباركة في قم، ومن المصاديق البارزة للعالم الرباني. وستبقى آثاره العلمية القيّمة وسائر…
☑️أعلنَ مكتبُ سماحة آية الله العظمى السيد علي الحسيني السيستانـي (دام ظلُّهُ) فــي النجفِ الأشرفِ أنَّ يومَ غدٍ الأحد الموافق (9/13/ 2026م) هو الأوّل من شهر ربيع الآخر لعام 1448هـ #مكتب_السيد_السيستاني
☑️الاستفتاءات الشرعية (حقوق الوالدين) السؤال: ١ـ إذا كان أحد الوالدين مريضاً ويطلب ما يضرّه مثل طلب الحلوى وهو مصاب بالسكر، فلو لم يلبّ الولد طلبهما حرصاً منه على صحّتهما فهل يُعتبر الولد عاقّاً أو عاصياً لهما أم لا؟ ٢ـ إذا تعارض أمر الأب مع أمر الأم وكان من موارد وجوب طاعتهما لتأذّيهما من مخالفتهما وكان الفعل بحدّ ذاته مباحاً، فأيّهما يقدّم عند التعارض رضا الأب أم رضا الأم؟ الجواب: ١ـ لا يكون عاقّاً ولا عاصياً بذ…
☑️أحدث إشراقة للمرجع الأعلى سماحة آية الله العظمى السيد علي الحسيني السيستاني (دام ظله) #المرجعية_الدينية #السيد_السيستاني
☑️أعلنَ مكتبُ سماحة السيد السيستاني (دام ظلّه) في النجف الأشرف أن يوم غدٍ الجمعة هو المكمّل لشهر صفر ، ويوم السبت الموافق (١٥-٨-٢٠٢٦ م) هو الأول من شهر ربيع الاول لعام ١٤٤٨ للهجرة، ونسألكم الدعاء . #مكتب_السيد_السيستاني
☑️أحدث ظهور لسيدنا علي السيستاني أطال الله في عمره المبارك . #السيد_السيستاني
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @lmamhusainorg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“السيد السيستاني دام الله ظله” (@lmamhusainorg), 76,560 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lmamhusainorg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.