Channel
@littlefish_bigfish
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
643subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001549762187 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @littlefish_bigfish |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/littlefish_bigfish |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:24 | 643 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 641 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:52 | 641 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (14 July 2026 – 30 July 2026) |
| Views total | 5,673 |
| Reactions total | 339 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
487 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5377309474182668626 | 266 | 54.6% | |
| custom 5267124716723795578 | 80 | 16.4% | |
| custom 5343906143427111577 | 66 | 13.6% | |
| custom 5240029928421861389 | 37 | 7.60% | |
| custom 5399868411947795134 | 26 | 5.34% | |
| custom 5341636004103084479 | 12 | 2.46% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 487reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Дорогие друзья, вопрос: а вы бы хотели прочитать небольшую главу про Юлю и Катю, которая не вошла и не могла войти в книгу? Да и что уж там, жила она только у меня в голове, но вот в начале этого июля я ее написала. Потом, правда, на мне как обычно потопталась жизнь, я решила уйти в кортизоловое небытие и забить на доработку этой мини-главки. Но вдруг вам интересно. Вдруг.
custom 537730947418266862643
Попался на глаза бесплатный сайт для письма vomit draft, пока изучаю, но выглядит привлекательно: есть режим просто для письма, есть режим для написания сценариев. И есть возможность сделать карту сцен и твистов. Я подобными ресурсами пользуюсь редко, но очень подкупает приятный цвет страницы и отсутствие отвлекающего шума. Мне долгое время было сложно писать в гуглдоках (как все нормальные люди) как раз из-за шума …
custom 526712471672379557819custom 53439061434271115773
Еще я сегодня прочитала у Оруэлла в «1984» очень точное описание альпийского развода. Удивилась, но не сильно.
custom 534390614342711157712
Мироздание внезапно подкинуло мне мем в тему. Делюсь:
custom 534390614342711157714custom 52400299284218613898
Чем мужской мир пугают матери? Беременным телом, которое еще более Другое. Властью − мать может слепить из ребенка кого угодно, даже серийного убийцу, говорит патриархат. Сейди Дойл пишут, что миф о кастрирующей матери-тиранше, воспитывающей маньяка («Психо», «Мертвая зона») берет начало в истории реальной семьи Гейнов. Про мать печально прославившегося Эда Гейна было известно, что та была очень набожной, и именно эт…
custom 537730947418266862618custom 53998684119477951349custom 53416360041030844795custom 52400299284218613891custom 52671247167237955781
На днях дочитала книгу небинарных автор_ки Сейди Дойл Dead Blondes and Bad Mothers: Monstrosity, Patriarchy and the Fear of Female Power («Мёртвые блондинки и плохие матери: чудовищность, патриархат и страх перед женской властью») и теперь много думаю об образе жестокой, властной, неуправляемой женщины, который тревожит наше воображение. Сам факт, что мужской мир демонизирует женщин, не стал для меня новостью − слож…
custom 537730947418266862622custom 53998684119477951349custom 53416360041030844797custom 52400299284218613891
Из хороших новостей: Сегодня вечером участница моей писательской лабы «Повсюду женщины» проведет онлайн-лекцию о гиносимпатии в литературе. Ульяна поговорит о том, почему женская дружба так мало представлена в литературе, о том, почему отношения между женщиной и женщиной зачастую описываются и читаются как менее важные, чем отношения между женщиной и мужчиной. И о том, как как в гетеронормативном мире подружба стано…
custom 537730947418266862625
Штош.
custom 534390614342711157710custom 53773094741826686265
#прочитано Ольга Аристова "Раз, два, три — замри" 👠 Что значит быть девочкой подростком в нулевые в небольшом российском городе? Короткие топики, босоножки на платформе, мини-юбки в стразах – это только внешнее, хотя в этом внешнем, кажется, проявляется оголенность нервов. 👠 Скорее всего, у тебя неблагополучная семья, но скорее всего, ты об этом не знаешь, потому что у всех твоих приятельниц такая же история. 👠 Это…
custom 526712471672379557815custom 53773094741826686265custom 53439061434271115771
Я не специалистка в автофикшне − свой роман «Раз, два, три − замри» я писала не по автофикциональным канонам (условно не делала социальную рамку, не использовала я-текст, не вставляла документы и газетные вырезки, не вступала в диалог с исследователь_ницами нулевых), но именно современный ру-язычный автофикшн помог мне сделать выбор в пользу языка, а не сюжета. Серж Дубровский, придумавший автофикшн как литературное …
custom 537730947418266862635custom 52671247167237955785custom 53439061434271115771
На днях в компании людей, по-разному далеких от наших с вами книжных болей, меня попросили объяснить, что такое автофикшн, и я вот так сходу не смогла. Почти каждый мой тейк про личную историю и искренность разбивался об − «А, ну это как у Довлатова!», «Получается, «Похороните меня за плинтусом» − автофикшн?», и, в целом, где мои оппонентки не правы? Если говорить об автофикшне только в разрезе личной истории, это де…
custom 537730947418266862620custom 534390614342711157712
Жизнь в эмиграции − это когда ты живешь от одной плохой новости до другой, и восстанавливаешься между ними. И надеешься, что следующей плохой новости не будет. Но вот опять.
custom 524002992842186138924custom 53439061434271115779
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @littlefish_bigfish. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 181,792 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“рыба текста” (@littlefish_bigfish), 643 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/littlefish_bigfish.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.