3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,050–4,059 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 23:32
4,051
-6
7 Aug 2026, 21:50
4,057
-1
7 Aug 2026, 05:33
4,058
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 17 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
198 reactions across 16 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
56
28.3%
❤
35
17.7%
⚡
24
12.1%
👀
21
10.6%
👍
19
9.60%
☃
14
7.07%
🐳
11
5.56%
😁
6
3.03%
😢
6
3.03%
🌚
2
1.01%
👏
2
1.01%
👻
1
0.505%
🤔
1
0.505%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 198reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 17 August 2025 to 16 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 17 we hold a reading for · 24%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @linn4o. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 August 2025 to 16 September 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
✈️ Plasma x Maple Finance / Последняя возможность поучаствовать в Pre-Deposit Vault
В 20:00 МСК откроется возможность зайти в Pre-Deposit Vault с ограниченным пулом 200m$ syrupUSDT на сайте Midas. Чтобы поучаствовать лучше всего сразу подготовить syrupUSDT (свапнуть можно на Uniswap) и зайти на страницу пулов Midas.
Какая вырисовывается доходность?
- syrupUSDT доходность - примерно 7% APR
- 50% Drips буст - даст ещ…
☕️ Дело было вечером, решил углубиться в проект Cap Money....(убил весь вечер)
Пока пост про блокчейны, ориентированные на стейблкоины, пишется, на досуге решил разобрать проект Cap Money (ищу варианты вложения после окончания Ethena S4)
Хороший обзор проекта можно прочитать у Bit.Future / Манна Небесная, где доводится суть, как работает проект. Я затрону несколько интересных моментов, которые нужно знать при фармин…
Ребят, смотрю по проектам и думаю, какой пост подготовить следующий:
Multipli | Второе дыхание проекта с новым инвестом 5 млн$?24%
Converge & Stable & Plasma & etc / Куда их так много?44%
Theo / Разбор проекта под фарм35%
Rumpel | Продаем "поинты" проектов до раздачи?23%
Pacifica | Поинтовая программа нового Perp-DEX28%
The shares total 154%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
В общем, кто досидел до 19 часов молодец, капу расширили еще на 50 млн до 260 млн$. Суммарно на 100 лямов$ в общем. А я забыл дать еще апрув USDC, и написать об этом...мда. По итогу многие видел закинули, сайт воркал, я не успел закинуть, пока разбирался. Придется через декс лимитками добирать, как людям завтра начнут USDai приходить...
👓 Закидываем в USDai через контракт / Расширение кепки через 30 минут / 19 МСК
Всем привет из солнечного Вьетнама, и сразу к делу. Команда убрала возможность минта через выпуск wM, но через контракт qUSDe так же оставила. Если в этот раз снова ляжет фронт, то получим наши qUSDai (USDai в очереди) через контракт. Советую в начале прогнать через контракт небольшую сумму, кто раньше не работал. Сам опыта не так много и…
⭐️"Выжимаем" USDAI на максимум / Все стратегии на данный момент
Продолжаю следить за USD.AI, вчера при открытии кепки все было заполнено за буквально 20 минут через контракт, пока лежал сайт. Пообещали увеличить кепку еще на 50 млн$ капы на след неделе, поэтому подготовимся заранее
Прежде всего, через буквально час, людьми начнет редемиться USDai из qUSDai, спустя ровно 24 часа. Так как сейчас курс на 2%-3% выше US…
🫡 Ну за что ты так с нами USDAI? Боже...
Сразу к сути, ночью выкатили обновление, из которых можно понять, что:
- если вы стейкаете в autosUSDai/autoUSDai, то вывод теперь будет занимать 30 дней, вместо 7 дней как было раньше
- теперь для позиций sUSDai и USDai - мультипликаторы 2x и 5x вместо 10x соответственно
Получается, что даже с плечом мы лутаем всего 9x поинтов вместо 10x за обычный LP на Pendle. Мда. И что …
🤩 Лучший вариант фарма проекта USD.AI. 45x поинтов + 25% APR
Кто фармит 2x поинтов за счет холда sUSDai, отодвигаем чашку утреннего кофе и читаем дальше:
0. Входим по рефочке на сайт USD.AI
1. Получаем через Curve sUSDai из USDC - для тех кто фармит Airdrop сторону, кто ICO - то получайте USDai
2. Закидываем в Euler в пул sUSDai/USDC -> через Multiply выкручиваем 4,5x. Максимум плечо под 5x, но рекомендую ставить н…
🎯 | Выгодные варианты YT на Pendle. Решил посмотреть какие YT продуктов сейчас торгуются, и что прицельно можно расмотреть для покупки в ближайшее время. Воспользовался сайтом https://quantsheep.com/ для анализа YT (спасибо Romanson) и решил разобрать USDe, tUSDe, pUSDe, reUSDe, sUSDai. Беру сразу с реферальным бустом 10% начисление поинтов поинты при расчетах
1. Ethena USDe (25 сентября). Торгуется чуть выше справе…
☕️ДЛИННОПОСТ / 1 / Куда можно выгодно закинуть стейблы и где у меня лежат деньги?
Пока я спешно готовлю вещи в переезд во Вьетнам, извиняюсь за пропажу, напишу пост, куда можно задепозитить деньги, какие варианты я рассматриваю, что вообще интересного в DeFi сейчас. Да и просто поделиться мыслями и идеями ребят
1️⃣/ Ethena и ее "подручные" Ethereal/Terminal/Strata. В Ethereal идет уже Season 1, TVL упал с 1 млрд$ -…
2️⃣ / USD.AI - стоит ли все же фармить? Про проект уже писал, но сейчас он "настоялся" и есть некоторые варианты все же закинуть. Сама концепция проекта мне нравится, но не нравится завышенная по мне оценка ICO - 300 млн$, по которой пытаются продать. По Dune, видно что 66% всего TVL проекта в sUSDai, которая фармит дроп. Но что же мне понравилось в проекте:
- Ряд "смарт" defi twitter инфлов держат там средства, прим…
⚡9🐳6🔥1
Signed lin4o
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @linn4o. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Ребят, смотрю по проектам и думаю, какой пост подготовить следующий:
Multipli | Второе дыхание проекта с новым инвестом 5 млн$?24%
Converge & Stable & Plasma & etc / Куда их так много?44%
Theo / Разбор проекта под фарм35%
Rumpel | Продаем "поинты" проектов до раздачи?23%
Pacifica | Поинтовая программа нового Perp-DEX28%
The shares total 154%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 17 August 2025 to 16 September 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,005,718 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@linn4o named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@chaoticgooddao named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“lin4o // куда-то инвестирует в DeFi” (@linn4o), 4,051 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/linn4o.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.