Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Лингвота

@lingvota

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

851subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001768559078
TypeChannel
Username@lingvota
Created15 November 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/lingvota

Growth

850851850.56 August 2026 — 850 subscribers6 August 2026 — 850 subscribers12 August 2026 — 851 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 850–851 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 22:57851+1
6 Aug 2026, 14:50850no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:48850first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 24 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
31.7%
avg views ÷ 851 subscribers
Avg views / post
270
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.81%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held17 (24 January 20264 August 2026)
Views total540
Reactions total53
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 14:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

544 reactions across 17 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
21038.6%
🔥15829.0%
👍11120.4%
🤩152.76%
🤔132.39%
😱112.02%
🥰71.29%
61.10%
🏆50.919%
💔30.551%
😁30.551%
👀10.184%
🤝10.184%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 544reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 24 January 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 07:32 UTC187 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

"Олень мя болъ" 🫎 В обсуждении предыдущего поста о формах типа махает возникли неожиданные вопросы: "а коза у вас бодёт или бодает?" "То есть если бы на Владимира Мономаха напал не тур а пёс, то он бы на него лол?" Начнем с того, могут ли где-то говорить "коза бодёт", и что там за "бол".🐐 "Болъ" употребляется в знаменитом Поучении Владимира Мономаха, где князь описывает свои "ловы": "...олень мя одинъ болъ, а 2 л

🔥212

27 Jul 2026, 07:27 UTC353 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Махаю, стакан с фурацилином и региональность морфологии Недавняя буря вида "Лингвисты опять узаконили что-то неправильное" («махаю», «махаешь» и т.д.) – напомнила мне эпизод из моей подростковой жизни. Но сначала про "махаю, махаешь, махай", образованные по аналогии со "знаю, знаешь" и конкурирующие с традиционными "машу, машешь, маши". Бурю разъяснила Светлана Друговейко-Должанская, член Орфографической комисси

15👍14🤝1

13 Jul 2026, 15:37 UTC505 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Просто художественная версия чата GPT. Особенно понравились пририсованные по собственной инициативе ИИ серенькие обычные люди

🤩1553😁3

12 Jul 2026, 07:14 UTC500 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Бумагомаратель_ница После прошлого поста обсудили в чате затейливые оскорбления, рожденные от идиом, подобно тому, как "белопальтошник" родилось из популярного обвинения оппонента в надевании белого пальто, то есть в претензии на моральное превосходство. Из прошлого, в частности, вспомнились неполитические пейоративы "бумагомаратель/бумагомарака". Правда, в ближайший чудный вечерок за вином и грибным супом возник

👍11🔥104👀1

27 Jun 2026, 08:10 UTC640 views35 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Всепропальщики, надсхваточники, белопальтошники, неоднозначники... Превращение политических идиом в политические ругательства напоминает раннесоветский жаргон: шкурник, упадочник, соглашатель. Ярлыки для оппонентов, в которых закапсулированы ядовитые политические идиомы ("шкурный интерес", "упадочные настроения"). В современном околополите издевательские идиомы (мемы, если угодно) тоже превращаются в пейоративы по

18🔥9👍8

15 Jun 2026, 11:44 UTC601 views31 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Почему тусануть, а не туснуть В прошлый раз было о тонкостях неологизмов на -ну-, теперь - на -ану-. Базануть, юзануть, зигануть, бустануть, форсануть, наконец, плюсануть. Этот суффикс чисто фонетическая разновидность -ну-? Отдельные образования типа кринжануть и хайпануть могут навести на мысль, что -а- помогает избежать нагромождения согласных. Но вот *туснуть фонетически вполне возможно, как куснуть, а на свет

🔥18👍12🤔1

4 Jun 2026, 16:57 UTC478 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Интересное лингвистическое на ВДНХ 👇

8

4 Jun 2026, 16:57 UTC646 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @forest_school_amPhoto

📒🌿 Гуманитарное отделение школы «Лес» на фестивале «Наука и мороженое»! 🍀 12 июня преподаватели и тьюторы гуманитарного отделения будут ждать вас в павильоне «Слово» на ВДНХ. 🌼 С 13:00 до 16:00 тьюторы гуманитарного отделения Аля Хитрова и Ира Баданина проведут три лингвистические игры: «Ложные друзья переводчика», «Шляпа» и «Лингвогеогессер». Ждём всех, кто любит игры со словами, хочет посмеяться и узнать больше о

11

1 Jun 2026, 09:18 UTC659 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

13👍11

25 May 2026, 08:51 UTC≈8,850 views61 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Репостнуть можно, *постнуть нельзя Еще можно "твитнуть", "аппрувнуть", "форварднуть", "лайкнуть", естественно, и в целом эта модель на подъеме. По моим данным, больше трети новых глаголов завели видовые пары мгновенного действия на -ну- (а также на -ану- - "базануть", "кринжануть" – но это несколько другое). Самое интересное, конечно, какие действия (особенно новые, у нас же куча новых цифровых действий) могут мысли

32👍11🤔8🏆5🔥5

5 May 2026, 18:35 UTC873 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Хотела прицепить к посту выше

12🥰7

5 May 2026, 17:55 UTC782 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Вообще готовлю доклад "От гуманоида до кубаноида", о возникновении относительно новой оценочной модели на -оид. ...А ниже просто милая цитата из Дугласа Адамса, не имеющая отношения ни к оценке, ни к конспирологии и мемам про рептилоидов, но демонстрирующая ранний (1970е) этап развития ещё одной современной ниши суффикса, причем интернациональной - нейминг фантастических существ: Somewhere in the cosmos, he said, al

17👍11😱2

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @lingvota. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 558,955 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Лингвота” (@lingvota), 851 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lingvota.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.