Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

жизнь и другие игры

@lifedungeon

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

39subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002194648568
TypeChannel
Username@lifedungeon
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/lifedungeon

Growth

3911 Aug 2026, 00:45 — 39 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 15:23 — 39 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 00:4511 Aug 2026, 15:23
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 38–40 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 15:2339no change
11 Aug 2026, 00:4539first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
94.9%
avg views ÷ 39 subscribers
Avg views / post
37.0
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
15.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held20 (27 May 202610 August 2026)
Views total222
Reactions total26
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 00:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

76 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3343.4%
🔥1418.4%
😁1215.8%
👍1013.2%
💯56.58%
😱22.63%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 76reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 20:52 UTC9 viewsread 11 August 2026
Poll

Внезапный опрос для олдов! Теххи или Меламори?

  1. Теххи33%
  2. Меламори67%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Aug 2026, 22:04 UTC33 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
File

И сюда тоже выложу)) Самая фолковая вещь из будущего альбома.

🔥4

29 Jul 2026, 23:21 UTC42 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @Oleg_BazaleevPhoto

Сто лет назад носил тунгус Американские джинсы на свой вкус В продолжение темы заморских товаров и доморощенных маркетплейсов. Ответьте на вопрос: «Как сто лет назад одевались тунгусы (устаревшее название современных эвенков), отправляясь на охоту в тайгу?» Кто сказал «ну, наверно, как-то были одеты в меха»? Не совсем... Продолжаем читать книгу Виктора Васильева «Тунгусы Алдано-Майского и Аяно-Охотского районов

👍7

29 Jul 2026, 23:21 UTC40 viewsread 11 August 2026

Аутентичность всегда сложнее чем кажется...

28 Jul 2026, 14:14 UTC45 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Как говорил Хелек, "Я тоже с бардАми УралА стараюсь дела не иметь"))

😁7

13 Jul 2026, 12:07 UTC56 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @red_spades

Нашли ученика, который закончил школу, не умея читать. Домашки он сдавал через ЧатГПТ, саму задачу ставил голосом, дальше копипастил. Вот офигенное судебное решение, нашёл @ijnmyoko_translations. Дано: простой пацан Вильям не умеет читать, считать и писать. Не может записать своё имя. И при этом он только что успешно закончил американскую школу примерно на нашу четвёрку. Смысл в том, что если ученик не умеет читать

4

13 Jul 2026, 12:07 UTC38 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Новости педагогики, так сказать. Но вообще прежде чем ужаснуться нашим ИИшным временам, я вспомнила одну немецкую статью, которую читала в вузе в начале нулевых. Там говорилось о явлении (я уже не помню немецкий термин), когда взрослые люди разучиваются читать и их приходится снова учить. Это была доинтернетная эпоха, у людей были газеты, но читать их было не обязательно, можно же смотреть телек. В общем... мы на сам

2

7 Jul 2026, 13:14 UTC53 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @lucidhomePhoto

Рисовальные лайфхаки! Это серия занятий, которые очень понравились моим ученикам в школе и будут интересны художникам-любителям. В чём суть: Это набор приёмов, которые сделают ваши рисунки лучше. Это и частички знаний из академического курса, и результат моего опыта и наблюдений, и советы, полученные от других художников. Темы занятий: "Как всё-таки рисовать руки", "Чтобы персонажи не стояли столбом", "Аккуратный и

2👍2

7 Jul 2026, 13:14 UTC42 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

У нас с друзьями есть педагогический канал, а в нём анонс моих рисовальных занятий)) Приходите!

3

11 Jun 2026, 20:12 UTC85 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Минусы: - Ну, про баги говорить нечего, ранний доступ такой ранний. После патча одна половина объектов взлетела в воздух, другая провалилась под землю. Но фиксят это всё довольно быстро. - Про "мало контента" тоже понятно и ожидаемо, надеюсь что будет больше. - Коллизии практически ни у чего нет, персонажи проходят сквозь друг друга и едят прямо в холодильнике. С другой стороны, это не баг, это фича. Даже в раннем до

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lifedungeon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Aug 2026, 20:52 UTCAnonymous Poll3 voters

Внезапный опрос для олдов! Теххи или Меламори?

  1. Теххи33%
  2. Меламори67%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,082,460 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“жизнь и другие игры” (@lifedungeon), 39 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lifedungeon.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.