Channel
@living_dog_notes
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
17subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002054457667 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @living_dog_notes |
| Description | Заметки на полях, вопросы, мысли, записки. @ak_brandt |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/living_dog_notes |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:46 | 17 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:17 | 17 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
8 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 50.0% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 37.5% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 12.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2025 to 4 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Некоторые текстологи и богословы пытаются использовать перестановки (например, переставить части 5 и 6 для лучшего географического соответствия). Иногда переставляют отдельные стихи и т.д. Но тут есть риск: может быть, у автора/финального редактора было другое видение порядка, и перестановки его разрушат. По крайней мере текущая версия текста - это версия, ставшая стандартом в какой-то момент времени. Переставленная …
👍1
Реймонд Браун "Евангелие от Иоанна" 1. Вопрос авторства. Одни ли автор? а. истории о женщине, взятой в прелюбодении нет в ранних текстах. b. глава 1 и 21 выбиваются стилистически с. провалы и непоследовательность предложений d. хронологические прыжки сильные, даже по меркам той эпохи например, первое чудо в Канне - чудеса в Иерусалиме - второе чудо в Канне (4:46-54) (почему чудеса в Канне считаются отдельно?) 13:36, …
Вернард Эллер. "Любимый ученик" 1. 4 Евангелия - 4 разных пазла, и на надо из смешивать в один 2 . Авторы, пересказчики и переписчики Евангелия не рассматривали своё свидетельство как историческую биографию Иисуса. Они рассматривали это как богословское свидетельство. 3. Это не подрывает богодухновенности Писания. Скорее помогает понять, как первые христиане понимали богодухновенность 4. Например, Лука явно берёт у…
👍1
Лишь одно в моей коробке - Бесподобный марципан, Каждый из нас - Бесподобный марципан.
❤3
Нет у нас подушки, Нет и одеяла, Мы залезли в тушу, Чтоб теплее стало. Забрались в кишочки Тёплые котятки, И с морозом ночью Поиграли в прятки!
👍1🔥1
На сайте Емельянова появился интерактивный инструмент демонстрирующий переходы экономической природы. На "ползунках" можно выставить норму, благодаря которой происходит трансформация экономической природы организации. На каждой точке "ползунка" есть примечание для понимания процесса трансформации.
нет времени на вот такие крутые штуки
https://azbyka.ru/otechnik/Aleksandr-Kraveckij/sluzhba-promysel-rabota-k-istorii-slov-i-ponjatij/#source
Коржавин о поэзии
❤1
Коржавин о Бродском
https://stolenrecordings.bandcamp.com/track/panda-eyes
Фольклор и Ветхий Завет. В 1918 году британский учёный Фрезер издал книгу "Фольклор в Ветхом Завете". Он сравнивал сюжеты Ветхого Завета с фольклором разных народов и пытался найти там сохранившиеся архаические элементы. Так он хотел показать, что Библия - продукт постепенной эволюции архаических взглядов. Это была первая работа с подобным подходом. В 1988 библеистка Патриция Киркпатрик написала книгу "Ветхий Заве…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @living_dog_notes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 855,096 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Заметки живой собаки” (@living_dog_notes), 17 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/living_dog_notes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.