Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 리도의 저장한 메시지

Channel

리도의 저장한 메시지

@lidosavedmessages

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

175subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001559065944
TypeChannel
Username@lidosavedmessages
Descriptionthis bull run you will make it - if it ever comes that is
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/lidosavedmessages

Growth

1757 Aug 2026, 12:30 — 175 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 14:01 — 175 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 12:308 Aug 2026, 14:01
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 174–176 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 14:01175no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:30175first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 19 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
596.6%
avg views ÷ 175 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,040
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held17 (19 May 202631 July 2026)
Views total2,088
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
331
Videos
3
Links
95

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
133.3%
👍133.3%
👎133.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 01:43 UTC78 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

딱 15.57% 찍고 하락하기 시작. 1557 당신은 대체.. 🤝 (credit to 잉여인간)

👍1

31 Jul 2026, 01:11 UTC≈2,010 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

아직 장중이긴하나 이미 외인 순매수는 기존 역대 최대기록을 까마득하게 뛰어넘는 중.. 이전 기록은 3877억인데 이 페이스면 더블스코어도 충분히 노려볼만한듯

2 Jul 2026, 12:34 UTC108 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

미국 6월 비농업 고용자 수 57,000명 증가(컨센서스 110,000명) 무친 초대박;

18 Jun 2026, 03:27 UTC146 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

혐주의) 조졌다 시즌1호 러브버그 봐버림

👎1

17 Jun 2026, 18:07 UTC≈4,200 viewsread 8 August 2026

이번 성명문의 변동 내용은 ① 위원회 내부의 의견 일치(만장일치), ② 포워드 가이던스의 대폭적인 간소화, ③ 경제 및 고용에 대한 평가 상향, ④ 인플레이션 통제에 대한 강력한 의지 표명으로 요약할 수 있습니다. 상세한 분석은 다음과 같습니다. 1. 만장일치(12-0) 체제로의 전환 및 내부 균열 봉합 변경 내용: 이전 성명문에 길게 포함되어 있던 위원들의 찬반 투표 명단과 소수 의견(Dissent) 단락이 통째로 삭제되었습니다. 대신 상단에 "12 대 0 표결로 다음 성명서 발표를 승인했다(approved the following statement for release by a 12 - 0 vote)"는 문구가 명시되었습니다. 해석: 지난 4월 회의에서는 금리 인하를 요구하는 비둘기파 위원(Stephen I. Miran)과 완화적 편향(

5 Jun 2026, 13:34 UTC166 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

고용이 좋으면 경제가 튼튼하니까 좋은거 아니냐는 얘기들이 좀 보이는데.. 이건 상황에 따라 달라요. 지금처럼 연준이 금리인상에 대한 고민을 하고 있는 상황에서 경제가 이 정도로 튼튼하다는 신호까지 나온다면 연준의 금리인상 기조에 더 힘을 실어줄 수 있는 명분이 되거든요. 울고 싶은데 뺨 때려준 격인거죠. 반대로 고용이 안좋게 나왔다면 연준도 "스읍 이거 아닌가?" 하고 다시금 생각해보게 하는 구실이 되었을테고요. 물론 nfp가 cpi나 pce만큼의 영향력은 아니지만 워낙 컨센과 차이가 커서 시장에도 꽤 영향이 있는거 같읍니다. 그리고 굉장히 단순화해서 설명한거라 항상 이렇게 돌아가진 않아요. (사실 저도 빡대가리라 딱 이 정도밖에 몰라요..)

5 Jun 2026, 11:52 UTC120 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @yieldnspreadPhoto

밤이 되었습니다. 환율은 고개를 들어주세요.

1 Jun 2026, 12:26 UTC165 viewsread 8 August 2026

??????: 샀다고 하면 맨날 떨어졌으니까 이번엔 팔아봄

29 May 2026, 09:04 UTC≈1,790 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

리저메 알파방에서 불과 이틀 전에 다 짚어드린 바..

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @lidosavedmessages. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“리도의 저장한 메시지” (@lidosavedmessages), 175 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lidosavedmessages.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.