посмотрела в мае всё понравилось! всем советую, всем смотреть и со мной обсуждать в вотч листе остались полутон и бэкрумс
custom 52423723821102678346

Channel
@letsgetasync
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
69subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002348132929 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @letsgetasync |
| Description | DevRel WB | Ex VK, Sber, Phystech Genesis, PGK Digital мой личный контактик @katelbova 🫶🏻 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/letsgetasync |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:31 | 69 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:31 | 69 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 20 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
125 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 79 | 63.2% | |
| 💘 | 20 | 16.0% | |
| custom 5242372382110267834 | 17 | 13.6% | |
| custom 5256223398236791592 | 9 | 7.20% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 125reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 20 October 2025 to 1 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
посмотрела в мае всё понравилось! всем советую, всем смотреть и со мной обсуждать в вотч листе остались полутон и бэкрумс
custom 52423723821102678346
посмотрела whats next meetup, очень интересный митап про пути героя в компании. особенно интересно было послушать про типы руководителей — их очень много, каждому типу людей подойдет свой, мой идеальный тип представлен на первом слайде) и в вк и в вб мне кажется у меня именно такие были и сейчас есть руководители, с ними мне максимально комфортно и классно развиваться. самый сложный для меня типаж на втором слайде,…
❤7custom 52423723821102678342
Посмотрела последние исследования по прогнозу трендов 2026, вот главные полезные инсайты для вас // 😊 Поверхностность восприятия Из-за FOMO люди меньше погружаются в контент, выхватывая только быстрые сигналы: знакомую картинку, фразу или звук. Поэтому ТikTok-тренды и мемы лидируют по охватам. Но они быстро забываются — люди отвлекаются на новые инфоповоды 😊 Комьюнитизация и CORE Молодые поколения хотят быть частью…
❤9custom 52423723821102678341
Рейтинг просмотренного в феврале 🦌 сериал I love LA 9/10 оч бредовый, если вам нравятся сериалы по типу киностудии и адалтс, то зайдёт 🦌 сериал Американская история любви 8.5/10 красивые гг, режиссировал райан мерфи (монстры, аиу) 🌟горничная 7/10 нормик, 7 за количество смешных тиктоков 🌟 грозовой перевал 6/10 не хватило эмоций, все герои неприятные, 6 за секси джейкоба элорди 🌟 Марти суприм 6/10 очень затянуто …
❤11
с коллегами приготовили и принесли в офис блины в честь масленицы, до того как я тоже превращусь в блин 3 2 1...
💘8
Приехали вот в такой wb дизайн домик, кому артикулы?
custom 52562233982367915929❤8
🤔 ухожу из vk проработала в VK больше года, нашла самых лучших и любимых коллег, пережила полное обновление команды, объездила кучу городов в командировках, сделала много стендов, конференций и митапов. и поняла, что сильно профессионально выросла и пришло время двигаться дальше, выхожу в новую компанию и, надеюсь, тут меня ждет что-то еще лучше ❤️
❤18💘12
Самые милые комментарии по итогам выпущенной новой коллекции мерча для спикеров, стендистов и подарков от VK ❤️
❤11custom 52423723821102678343
С таким красивым стендом открыли сезон конференций по джаве, следующая в ноябре по мобилке! Решили попробовать новые стили и ездим с концептом японского саунд-бара (в коллабе с Питерским баром цветочки и лимонадами лапочка) 🐈
❤9custom 52423723821102678343
😡 Как лиду строить стратегию Самая интересная для меня тема, буквально то, на чем все держится и что все базово ждут от лида — уметь в стратегию. После работы с мл, бэком, мобилкой, фронтенд и продуктовым направлением у меня идет сужение аудитории и лидирование уже стрима, а не бизнес линий. Сейчас я работаю с Java сообществом и впереди как всегда стратегия) баланс результатов. нам надо - быстрые результаты (никто …
❤6custom 52423723821102678342
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @letsgetasync. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 739,600 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Синканемся?” (@letsgetasync), 69 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/letsgetasync.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.