Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

КОМРЕДА про маркетинг

@komreda

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,051subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001937176647
TypeChannel
Username@komreda
Created1 September 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/komreda

Growth

3,0403,0513,045.57 August 2026 — 3,045 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,045 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,044 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,040 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,051 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,038–3,053 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 06:563,051+11
10 Aug 2026, 16:313,040-4
7 Aug 2026, 16:533,044-1
7 Aug 2026, 09:313,045no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:183,045first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.6%
avg views ÷ 3,051 subscribers
Avg views / post
505
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.58%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (18 June 20266 August 2026)
Views total5,051
Reactions total181
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 00:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

514 reactions across 20 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12023.3%
🔥6111.9%
🐳489.34%
🦄417.98%
🫡346.61%
👍316.03%
😍316.03%
🥰275.25%
💯183.50%
🤓142.72%
🤔122.33%
❤‍🔥112.14%
🎉101.95%
😇101.95%
🙏101.95%
👏91.75%
😭71.36%
💔61.17%
🤡61.17%
🤯61.17%
2 further kinds20.389%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 514reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 14:53 UTC232 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Бро, прости за звуки ремонта во время работы. Просто мы взяли интервью с Никитой Назаровым, шеф-редактором «ВсеИнструменты.ру»: https://clck.ru/3V8JyN #контент_хирос @komreda

9😍6🔥5👍1

6 Aug 2026, 14:53 UTC229 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

9🤓4🔥3

4 Aug 2026, 15:12 UTC277 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Осторожно, материал вызывает потребность в перекуре 😤 А ниже поговорили с Катей Лбовой, DevRel RWB, об отдыхе от интернетов: ⚫️ Когда ты понимаешь, что точно пора отдохнуть от соцсетей и работы? Когда замечаю, что перестаю воспринимать информацию осознанно. Просто читаю текст или новость, и мозг её никак не обрабатывает — просто поглощает поток инфоповодов. И если ловлю себя на том, что открываю приложения автомат

❤‍🔥9💯6😍6

29 Jul 2026, 14:05 UTC467 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

У тебя есть 20 ₽. Собери работу мечты 🪙 Удалёнка — 10 ₽ 🪙 ДМС и бенефиты — 9 ₽ 🪙 ЗП выше рынка — 13 ₽ 🪙 Хороший корп. ноут — 7 ₽ 🪙 Норм фото на пропуске — 2 ₽ 🪙 Доп. дни отпуска — 25 ₽ 🪙 Вэлком бокс — 0 ₽ @komreda

5🦄5🐳4💅1

28 Jul 2026, 15:01 UTC582 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

«Вы нетакусики, мы нетакусики — давайте дружить» А давайте! Показываем несколько цитат из нового интервью с Даниэль Василевич, экс-пиар-лидом «Рокетбанка». 💬 «...благодаря „а39“ в „Рокетбанке“ появился секс»; 💬 «Мы пытались понять, почему люди не любят банки, и в итоге сформулировали очень простой ответ: банки за*бывают и на*бывают»; 💬 «...мы не очень любим дружить с теми, кто уже подружился со всеми». Полный ра

10🔥8👍6😍2👏1

22 Jul 2026, 14:21 UTC≈1,010 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Posted without readable text

9💯5🔥5😭2

21 Jul 2026, 12:45 UTC559 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @prhubmoscowPhoto

Ищем рилсмейкера в редакцию Журнала Пиархаба 👍👍 Готовим кое-что интересное, но пока не будем раскрывать все карты! Что нужно делать: — снимать короткие видео под ключ — от сценария до монтажа; — монтировать ролики из готовых материалов; — организовывать выездные съёмки вместе с командой; — генерить идеи и составлять контент-планы. Что хотим от вас: — классное портфолио с вирусными рилсами; — опыт самостоятельной

🔥6👏5🤯32

20 Jul 2026, 14:03 UTC495 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Подгоняем нормальный улов! В сетке: 🐟 караси; 🐟 барракуды; 🐡 интервью с Игорем Ивановым, контент-директором «Сетки» про четыре боли поиска работы, возвращение хьюман в хьюман рилейшн и контенты в соцсетях сервиса! Фулл — не в комментах, а по ссылке: https://clck.ru/3UsJwK #контент_хирос @komreda

5👍5🤓5❤‍🔥1👌1🤯1

17 Jul 2026, 14:05 UTC547 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Аттракцион невиданной щедрости от руководства: забей мяч в ворота — получи дей-офф Копируем ⚽️ и присылаем в комменты. Забил — бери офф, можно только в сб или вскр. Промахнулся — уволен. @komreda

4💯3🙏3

14 Jul 2026, 15:10 UTC653 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ребят, решили закончить вторник хэлси-привычками. Например, выпустить интервью о контенте «ВкусВилла» 🍌 Обсудили с Анастасией Бобровой, руководителем редакции «ВкусВилла»: некислые «ЩИ», зожные баталии, стереотипы о люксовых товарах и отработку негатива в соцсетях. Диалог по ссылке: https://clck.ru/3UnDcd #контент_хирос @komreda

6👍5🙏3❤‍🔥1💯1

10 Jul 2026, 07:51 UTC822 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Приготовили наше любимое блюдо: зашкварки по-эсэмэмски 🧑‍🍳 Отвечает на блиц Катя Верлина, руководитель направления клиентского SMM маркетплейса цветов и подарков Flowwow. ⚫️ Считать охваты и вовлечённость, но не учитывать продажи — зашквар? Не зашквар, вопрос целей бренда в работе с соцсетями. Не всем нужно считать продажи, полученные с соцсетей. ⚫️ Писать коллегам после 19:00 — зашквар? Не зашквар, если есть ср

🔥7💔6🥰6💯1🤯1

9 Jul 2026, 13:48 UTC621 views73 reactionsread 8 August 2026

У вас есть бюджет на одного сотрудника. Приходят трое, все одинаково круто выполнили тестовые. А теперь надо выбрать, так сказать, по софтам... Димон ↓ Шарит за астрологию и ретроградные планеты, принимает решения на основе этих знаний. Делает расклады на картах Таро, чтобы узнать результаты тендера. ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ Сеня (Арсений) ↓ Слушает ГС на 2х, а ролики на Ютубе — н

🐳37🫡25🦄101

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @komreda. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 166,334 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“КОМРЕДА про маркетинг” (@komreda), 3,051 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/komreda.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.