6 measurements spanning 31 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 145–154 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Sept 2026, 22:15
153
+6
29 Aug 2026, 14:26
147
+1
22 Aug 2026, 20:33
146
-3
14 Aug 2026, 11:49
149
-3
8 Aug 2026, 19:31
152
no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:45
152
first reading
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 23 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
93 reactions across 6 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
36
38.7%
❤
23
24.7%
👍
18
19.4%
👏
7
7.53%
⚡
4
4.30%
🤩
3
3.23%
🫡
2
2.15%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 93 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 23 February 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вчера писал про Довод и спрашивал у вас, как лучше поступить: оставить его как внутренний инструмент команды или все-таки вывести на рынок.
И тут прилетел очень сильный и, честно, неожиданный ответ от Сергея, основателя Ruexpedition 👍
Кстати, с ребятами из Ruexpedition мы в 2022 году были в одной из самых запоминающихся экспедиций в моей жизни - на Камчатке 🌋 Поэтому особенно ценно было получить такой развернутый в…
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Как выиграть дело, если 90% судебной практики против тебя?
Не так давно мой близкий друг Ильяс познакомил меня с очень сильным разработчиком Али. За его плечами IT-продукты с многомиллионной капитализацией и супер релевантный на сегодня опыт создания продуктов на базе ИИ.
В какой-то момент мы решили объединить компетенции. Так появился Довод.
Если совсем просто, это не очередной ChatGPT для юристов. Это инструмент…
Свежая статистика Федресурса по банкротству и мои наблюдения.
1) Бум банкротств у компаний явно на спаде
В 2025 году по компаниям введено 11.7 тыс. процедур банкротства (это минимум с 2015 года)
Для контраста, в 2015 году было 23.2 тыс. То есть рынок реально сжался почти вдвое.
2) Реабилитационные процедуры
Про них почти нечего сказать. Их доля в 2025 году 0,9% от процедур. Это ближе к погрешности, чем к статисти…
Блок 3. Сделки — самое опасное, потому что “раскрывается” по ходу
Иногда управляющий сначала оспаривает сделки отдельно, а в субсидиарку напрямую не вменяет. Но это временно.
Если сделки оспорят - основания легко уточняются, и директор получает новый эпизод в деле.
У нас был как раз такой момент: новые эпизоды появлялись уже в процессе. Формально они «ещё не предъявлены», но риск очевидный. Мы заранее включились и …
Продолжая тему про «поток» и восстановление.
Когда голова отдохнула — решения действительно приходят легче. Но есть важный нюанс: в сложных проектах (вроде субсидиарки) "озарение" работает только поверх системы и хард скилов.
Недавно защищал генерального директора от субсидиарной ответственности. Классика жанра: вменяют сразу всё.
1. «Не передал документы»
2. «Не подал на банкротство»
3. «Вредоносные сделки/платеж…
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @legalbpp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 23 February 2026 to 31 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Павел Бирюков | Юрист” (@legalbpp), 153 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/legalbpp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.