Channel
@lcheremisina
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
488subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001296556575 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lcheremisina |
| Description | Всем привет) Познакомимся! 🥰Меня зовут Любовь Черемисина. Связь со мной: @Lubovcheremisina Я в ВКонтакте: vk.com/lyubovcheremisina Мой инстаграм : https://instagram.com/lyubov.cheremisina?utm_medium=copy_link Буду рада новым знакомствам! |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lcheremisina |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:48 | 488 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 488 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 31 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (31 December 2024 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 18:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
25 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 19 | 76.0% | |
| ❤ | 6 | 24.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2024 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌙 Есть вещи, которые лучше сохранить до того, как они понадобятся ↓ PROTechnology технологии, ИИ и цифровые тренды ✦ Ctrl+Game: Гейминг Киберспорт игры, киберспорт и игровые события ✦ АвтоПульс: Новости и Тренды авто, новости и свежие обзоры ✦ GameLAB материалы для любителей игр ✦ Худеем без стресса полезные привычки и забота о себе 🌸Видео stories reels. 🌸Срочные Новости. 🌸Лучшие_фильмы_чат_о_кино_у_нас. 🌸Видео эст…
⚡️Внутри скрыты подходы, которые экономят часы — проверь и применяй: : ̗̀➛ Школа энергетической Арт терапии : ̗̀➛ Твой VIP визуал : ̗̀➛ твоя тихая сила (женский) ───── ⋆⋅☆⋅⋆ ───── 💼 Бизнес и работа ↳Инфографика Wb, дизайн ВК ↳Готовые посты 💅🏻 Красота и стиль ↳Идеи маникюра ↳Рецепты красоты ↳Твои Сторис ВАУ 🌏 Интернет и соц.сети ↳Обои hd ↳Фоны|Заставки|Оформление ВК ↳Игры / интерактивы ↳Ключевые слова для Reels …
Обновила свою новую духовку. Второй раз в жизни пекла творожный кулич. 😍 Первый опыт был не очень, но тогда была газовая духовка. В этот раз все получилось! 👍 Этот дрожжевой кулич порадовал мягкостью, нежным вкусом и насыщенным ароматом. Благодаря творогу и щедрой порции сливочного масла выпечка получается особенно влажной и воздушной.🥮 #пасха #кулич
❤3👍1
Поздравляю всех с праздником Светлой Пасхи🕊️ Желаю мира и боагополучия😍 #пасха #пасхальныйдекор
Такая закуска на праздничном столе разлетится за 5 минут, уверяю вас 😋👌 Ингредиенты: • копчено-вареный балык • лист салата • светлый сыр-косичка Для начинки: • отварная курица • твердый сыр • консервированный ананас • отварные яйца • майонез Мелко нарезаем отварную курицу и ананас. Сыр и яйца натираем на терке. Все ингредиенты смешиваем с майонезом. Выкладываем сыр-косичку, пластик балыка, лист салата, начинку и …
👍8❤2
Эта закуска готовится супер-просто и быстро ☺️👌 🥔 Запеченный картофель с форелью Берём небольшие картофелины, смазываем растительным маслом, заворачиваем в фольгу и отправляем запекаться в разогретую духовку до 175° на 50-60 минут. Начинка: Мелко нарезаем форель или любую другую красную рыбку, маринованные огурцы, серединку от готового картофеля, укроп и всё смешиваем с творожным сыром и майонезом. Готовую начинк…
👍4❤1
«Нарядные тарталетки» - я бы их так назвала 🥰👌 Такая закуска точно будет выигрышно смотреться на Новогоднем столе 😍 Начинка с курицей и грибами 😋 Ингредиенты: • тарталетки • отварная курица • шампиньоны • чеснок • творожный сыр • грецкий орех • гранат • укроп • соль/перец Грибы мелко режем и обжариваем с чесноком, соль/перец по вкусу. Смешиваем мелко нарезанную отварную курицу, грибы, грецкий орех и творожный сыр…
👍6
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @lcheremisina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 400,483 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 26 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@lcheremisina named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Праздничные рецепты.” (@lcheremisina), 488 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lcheremisina.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.