Channel
@lazyqa
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
249subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002211057516 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lazyqa |
| Description | Вы все еще хотите тестировать? Тогда мы идем к вам! |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 18 July 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lazyqa |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 12:23 | 249 | no change |
| 7 Sept 2026, 14:47 | 249 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
109 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 43 | 39.4% | |
| 🔥 | 31 | 28.4% | |
| ❤ | 19 | 17.4% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 9.17% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 2.75% | |
| 🤨 | 2 | 1.83% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 0.917% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 109 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2024 to 25 December 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
На ночь глядя проверяю домшки студентов, которые хотят все-таки завершить обучение и взяли доп проверки. Написала особенности RESTful API и рекомендации по тестированию. Не смогла не поделиться с вами 1. GET Нюансы: • Используется исключительно для получения данных, безопасен и идемпотентен (повторные запросы дают тот же результат, не меняя состояние сервера). • Тело запроса не используется, так как все параметры …
🔥15❤2👍2💘1
Просто напоминаю. 86% скидки на мои курсы завтра превратятся в тыкву. Ссылки выше ☝️
AI вступает и в нашу школу IT switcher И на базе наших курсов делаем виртуального куратора, который будет отвечать на вопросы студентам, даже если ничего не понятно (хотя такого в нашей школе не бывает 😇). Короче, смотрите, я попросила чат-бот объяснить мне модель OSI как ребенку, который ничего не понял их уроков и вот, что получилось: Представь себе, что ты отправляешь письмо другу. Модель OSI — это как инструкц…
🔥13🤨2
Почему в скрам командах 7+-2 человека? Пара мыслей из книги The Collaboration Book: 1. Чтобы проще было управлять и быть в контексте друг друга 2. Чтобы не было достаточно людей для того, чтобы дружить друг против друга 3. Новички быстро вливаются в маленькие команды 4. Меньше шансов размазать ответственность или слиться с нее 5. Меньше времени на митинги, решения, обсуждения Есть еще правило 2 пицц: «если ваша ко…
😁13
🎓 Колллеги, подготовили для вас небольшой пост, в котором собрали самые свежие эфиры с выпускниками нашей школы. Обсудили проблемы из жизни тестировщиков, как мало работы, как много отказов. Что делать, чтобы пробраться? Сколько учились, стажировались, искали работу, нужна ли автоматизация? И многое-многое другое - самое свежее и актуальное! 🔥 Приятного и полезного просмотра! 🚀 Эфир с Виктором https://youtube.com/…
🔥3❤2
Смотрели нового дедпула? Там говорят и про нас тоже было. Герой хотел очень быстро выпустить штуку, которая уничтожает таймлайны и требовал отменить тестирование, чтобы быстрее уже ей воспользоваться. Что там в конце было, кто в курсе? Нужны в итоге тестировщики-то или нет? 😁
😁7👍2
File, posted without a caption
👍6
Запись эфира с Татьяной в формате подкаста 👇 Про новую работу, зарплату, 0 откликов на 300 заявок на вакансии и как в итоге работа нашлась. Пишите ваши вопросы в комменты!
Live stream finished (54 minutes)
начали эфир! залетайте
Live stream started
Сегодня проведем здесь прямой эфир в 19 мск! Наш гость - Татьяна - свежеиспеченный QA инженер. Как искала работу, как училась, что было сложным и как справлялась. Сколько зарабатывает тоже спросим! https://t.me/lazyqa?livestream
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @lazyqa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@lazyqa named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ленивый тестировщик” (@lazyqa), 249 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lazyqa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.