Posted without readable text
custom 54452849809786213876

Channel
@lazarev_tg
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
139subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001659452793 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lazarev_tg |
| Description | 🚀Автоматизация для бизнеса. Связь со мной: @afifif Кейсы: @lazarev_tg_review |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lazarev_tg |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 139 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:50 | 139 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 19 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
178 reactions across 16 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 68 | 38.2% | |
| ❤ | 35 | 19.7% | |
| 👍 | 24 | 13.5% | |
| custom 5445284980978621387 | 23 | 12.9% | |
| 💯 | 9 | 5.06% | |
| custom 5965443999136223076 | 4 | 2.25% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 2.25% | |
| 🤣 | 4 | 2.25% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 1.12% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 1.12% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 1.12% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.562% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 178reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 19 November 2024 to 27 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Posted without readable text
custom 54452849809786213876
LazPN
custom 54452849809786213873
lazpn.ru
custom 54452849809786213877
___________________________________________
custom 54452849809786213877
Photo, posted without a caption
💯9❤3
👆👆👆 1 часть поста ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🏆Вера в себя и в результат: что она даёт Когда веришь в себя и в результат, появляется энергия и мотивация. Ты готов выложиться на 110%, даже если кажется, что шансов мало. Эта вера и прокаченное мышление помогают мне справляться с самыми сложными задачами. Я понимаю, что если получится, то это будет успех, если нет, то я получил бесценный опыт, который мне поможет в будущем. Любое …
❤11👍4🔥4
🏆 Моя личная формула успеха 🏆Одно из самых главных правил в моей жизни — это "ННН" - Нет Ничего Невозможного. Если кто-то может это сделать, значит, смогу и я! Правда, иногда встаёт вопрос: а нужно ли делать самому или лучше делегировать? Иногда быстрее сделать самому, чем тратить время на поиск подходящего специалиста. ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🏆Суть моей формулы Моя формула — это не просто действия. Это: Действие + спо…
❤11🔥4custom 59654439991362230764👍2
👨💻Полезности Избавляемся от сутулости и перенапряжения мышц всего одним упражнением, используя только полотенце. Делаю каждый день и вам советую 🤝
👍6❤3🔥1
Что вам помогает добиваться результатов? Пишите в комментариях 👇👇👇 А я скоро поделюсь с вами своей личной формулой успеха
👍6🔥1
🤔Почему многие чат-боты не приносят ожидаемых результатов? Главная проблема — не в ботах, а в том, как они создаются. Вот основные ошибки, которые убивают эффективность и превращают даже самых перспективных ботов во временное развлечение: 1️⃣ Отсутствие анализа и доработки ● Многие считают, что бот — это «сделал и забыл». Но это не так! Без регулярной аналитики и оптимизации бот быстро теряет актуальность. ● Оши…
🔥6🤔2❤1
👐Результат одного из моих проектов. Немного расскажу про один очень интересный проект, какой запрос и что было сделано, я думаю вам будет это очень интересно. Цифры все показать не могу, но какую-то часть можно) 🚗Тема проекта: Розыгрыш автомобиля и 9 ценных призов + дополнительные розыгрышах. 🙋Запрос: Покупка билетов в боте, для розыгрыша авто и других призов, чтобы это было максимально просто, создание импульсной…
🔥11👍3❤1
А вы знаете, какой запрос чаще всего у блогеров с миллионной аудиторией? - "Автоматизировать запуски по максимуму, именно для своей целевой аудитории, чтобы это было просто для клиентов и повысило конверсию в продажу?" Скоро расскажу, как я решил одну из таких задач.
🔥8👍3🤔2
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @lazarev_tg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 486,084 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Александр Лазарев|Автоматизация” (@lazarev_tg), 139 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lazarev_tg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.