Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Seed Announcements

Channel

Seed Announcements

@launchwithseed

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

391subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003495213447
TypeChannel
Username@launchwithseed
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 15 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/launchwithseed

Growth

391398394.57 August 2026 — 398 subscribers8 August 2026 — 398 subscribers8 August 2026 — 397 subscribers15 August 2026 — 391 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 390–399 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 17:28391-6
8 Aug 2026, 13:13397-1
8 Aug 2026, 05:49398no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:57398first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 05s
Average length
41s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

180 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9653.3%
🔥6133.9%
🎉63.33%
👍52.78%
42.22%
👀31.67%
👏31.67%
10.556%
😁10.556%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 180reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 January 2026 to 2 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Mar 2026, 13:47 UTC335 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Update regarding BaseCase 🌱 Transparency has always been one of the core principles of SEED, and today we want to address the situation around BaseCase. Over the past weeks, we have been in continuous communication with the BaseCase team regarding development progress, token-related events, and the formal report we requested following the recent token activity. Multiple deadline extensions were granted in good fait

👍52👀1

28 Feb 2026, 06:23 UTC266 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

What actually decides a successful launch in 2026?

  1. Community depth > follower count21%
  2. Utility + revenue model41%
  3. Liquidity strategy and post TGE plan45%
  4. Narrative fit with market cycle3%

The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

24 Feb 2026, 11:06 UTC336 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

The importance of post-token sale support 🌱 In today’s market, a token sale is not the achievement. Once a project moves from private rounds and controlled allocations into open market conditions, it enters a phase where volatility, liquidity dynamics, and community psychology begin to shape perception faster than any announcement ever could, which is exactly why structured post-token sale support is no longer optio

🔥51

11 Feb 2026, 17:03 UTC331 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Access. Logic. Engine. SEED. What SEED is made from: 🧬 Early access DNA SEED is structured to unlock early-stage opportunities before they become narratives. 🧠 Smart allocation logic Capital is deployed with structure, rules, and long-term upside in mind. 🌐 Ecosystem access SEED connects launches, products, community, and liquidity into one coordinated system. 🚀 Launch engine core SEED is built as a launch mecha

🔥5

6 Feb 2026, 07:56 UTC305 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

BaseCase Testnet is LIVE BaseCase has officially launched its public testnet - a functional, interactive MVP that anyone can use right now. The protocol is live on a dedicated private test blockchain, allowing users to mint test ETH and USDC, explore the mechanics, and stress-test prediction markets with zero real-fund risk. What’s live on testnet: 💰Wallet sign-in + instant funding via faucet 🙂‍↕️ Market creation

8👏1🔥1

3 Feb 2026, 11:23 UTC257 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

BaseCase MVP goes LIVE in 1 day: 4th February In just one day, BaseCase moves from “coming soon” to fully live. It’s a working MVP you’ll be able to use immediately to experience permissionless prediction markets the way they’re meant to work: any market, any topic, any time. For the next few weeks, the BaseCase MVP will run on testnet. You’ll be able to create markets, participate in them, stress-test the system,

3

2 Feb 2026, 16:23 UTC192 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

BaseCase MVP: LIVE 4TH FEBRUARY The BaseCase test goes live in two days. This is no longer a roadmap or a promise: it’s a live MVP you can actually use - and see the value of permissionless prediction markets for yourself. Any market, any topic, any time. For several weeks, the BaseCase MVP will be live on testnet so you can create markets, participate in markets, and earn up to 5,000,000 $CASE while doing so. You’

🔥74

29 Jan 2026, 15:58 UTC205 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Pick your position: Player or Creator? BaseCase supports two clear ways to profit off prediction markets, depending on how you think about risk and conviction. Creator: If the house always wins, become the house. On BaseCase, creators aren’t trading outcomes: they’re defining the market itself. You can create a market around any topic people care about and benefit from the activity it generates, not from predictin

🔥72

28 Jan 2026, 12:03 UTC227 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

SEED Staking Calculator is live. To make staking decisions clearer and more transparent, we’ve launched the SEED Staking Calculator: a simple way to see how different lock periods translate into yield, multipliers, and tier positioning before you commit. Input your $SEED amount, choose your preferred lock period, and instantly see how APY and point multipliers scale. Longer commitments unlock higher yields (up to 1

🔥115🎉3

26 Jan 2026, 14:46 UTC363 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

PROFIT OFF POLARIS: BaseCase x BJJ BaseCase has partnered with Polaris Pro Grappling, Europe’s longest-running professional grappling organisation, to bring live Polaris events onto open prediction markets. For the first time, fans won’t just watch Polaris BJJ matches - they’ll be able to profit from them. BJJ is one of the fastest-growing sports globally, with hundreds of millions of viewers each year, yet it rema

6🔥2

23 Jan 2026, 13:05 UTC98 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @PineappleDexNewsPhoto

🔴 PINEAPPLE AMA: LIVE NOW We’re live with our most transparent AMA to date. Our CEO Ali is going through everything you need to know about Pineapple in 2026: revenue, delivery, accountability, and how going forward it will all tie back to $PAPPLE. 🍍 Pineapple 2.0 🍍 $SEED vs $PAPPLE 🍍 Revenue and adoption 🍍 Product delivery and focus 🍍 What evolves from here 🔗 Join live: youtube.com/watch?v=mvhKmDf1eqc

6🔥1

22 Jan 2026, 15:06 UTC190 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Prediction markets are heating up. Over the past 22 weeks, prediction markets have recorded 21 all-time highs in transaction count. Last week alone, total transactions surpassed 25 million, while weekly volume reached a new ATH at $5.7B. The current leaders are operating at nearly identical scale: 👀Kalshi at ~$2B 👀Opinion at ~$1.9B 👀Polymarket at ~$1.8B But on leading platforms, users are restricted to a fixed set

6🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @launchwithseed. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Feb 2026, 06:23 UTCAnonymous Poll29 voters

What actually decides a successful launch in 2026?

  1. Community depth > follower count21%
  2. Utility + revenue model41%
  3. Liquidity strategy and post TGE plan45%
  4. Narrative fit with market cycle3%

The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 January 2026 to 2 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 335,902 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Seed Announcements” (@launchwithseed), 391 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/launchwithseed.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.