BaseCase Testnet: ONLINE. 🟢 The journey to mainnet starts today. Grab your testnet tokens and start exploring the ecosystem. Let’s see what markets you make. 🦾 Join the testnet: testnet.basecase.gg https://x.com/i/status/2019642202213814770
🔥6❤5🥰2👍1

Channel
@basecasenews
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3,046subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003507840710 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @basecasenews |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 17 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/basecasenews |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Aug 2026, 15:24 | 3,046 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:49 | 3,048 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:48 | 3,050 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 3,055 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:01 | 3,055 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
244 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 104 | 42.6% | |
| 🔥 | 83 | 34.0% | |
| 👏 | 43 | 17.6% | |
| 🎉 | 5 | 2.05% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 1.64% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 1.23% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 0.82% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 244reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 January 2026 to 6 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
BaseCase Testnet: ONLINE. 🟢 The journey to mainnet starts today. Grab your testnet tokens and start exploring the ecosystem. Let’s see what markets you make. 🦾 Join the testnet: testnet.basecase.gg https://x.com/i/status/2019642202213814770
🔥6❤5🥰2👍1
Ok everybody. Thank you for your patience ! The BaseCase Testnet is live at testnet.basecase.gg ! Please keep in mind this is a beta of our product and we've worked very hard to get a functional, interactive version out for you all to test and give feedback on. You can leave feedback here: https://www.basecase.gg/give-feedback Remember, we have allocated 5,000,000 $CASE tokens for the best feedback and review. On…
❤3🎉2🔥2
https://t.me/launchwithseed/78
🔥4👏2💯2
BaseCase Testnet: February 4th. Testnet goes live in 48 hours. We’re giving you the tools to predict the future with zero risk. Use our faucet to claim test tokens, stress-test the bonding curve, and prove your edge. How it'll work: 1. Claim from the Faucet: Get your free testnet tokens directly from our faucet to start trading immediately. 2. Create Markets: Set up a prediction market for any outcome you can im…
❤7🔥5👏3🥰1
BaseCase feature at Polaris 35 is LIVE. The best grapplers on earth are on the mats right now, and so are we. Keep an eye out for BaseCase on the broadcast. This isn't just a sponsorship; it's a statement. High-level grappling is a sport of calculated risk, strategy, and probability. It is synonymous with prediction markets. Today, we are on the canvas. Soon, you’ll be in the market. Once the BaseCase platform i…
❤6👏4🔥3
Grappling isn’t just about strength, it’s about precision, strategy, and anticipating the next move. The audience doesn’t just watch; they study every transition. This is why @PolarisProEvent and @BaseCases are a perfect fit. The grappling community is one of the most analytical in sports. Fans already predict outcomes, debate matchups, and dissect techniques. BaseCase simply builds the infrastructure to reward tha…
❤5🔥3👏2
Polaris has always been about elite competition and a global audience. What it never had was a way for that audience to participate economically in what they’re watching. That changes with @BaseCases. Through a partnership with Polaris Pro Grappling, live Polaris events are being brought onto open prediction markets. For the first time, fans won’t just follow the matches, they’ll be able to engage with them in real …
❤5👏3🔥3
Week 2 Status Report: The momentum is real. We’re keeping our heads down and the focus high. The dev team is pushing major code updates, foundational partnerships are being solidified behind the scenes, and the core engine is officially revving up. Keep your notifications on. We will be sharing details on the Testnet release date in the coming days. We aren't just building for the moment; we’re building for the lo…
❤5👏3🔥3
4 DAYS TO POLARIS 35: BaseCase x BJJ @BaseCases is bringing live @PolarisProevent onto open prediction markets. For the first time, watching elite BJJ won’t be passive, you’ll be able to profit from the fights, not just who wins, but how each match unfolds. From walkouts and fighter details to live, in-match dynamics, every Polaris card becomes a real economic playground. And if a market doesn’t exist, anyone can …
❤7👏4🔥4
While building Base Case, we aren't just removing the "review teams" and the "deny buttons", we're burning those desks. If you wake up on a Monday with a market idea, you don't need our approval. You don't need to wait for business hours. We literally cannot stop you from creating a market. Not us. Not anyone. That is the only true definition of ownership. Testnet coming soon. basecase.gg https://x.com/i/status…
👏5❤3🔥3
PROFIT OFF POLARIS: BaseCase x BJJ BaseCase has partnered with Polaris Pro Grappling, Europe’s longest-running professional grappling organisation, to bring live Polaris events onto open prediction markets. For the first time, fans won’t just watch Polaris BJJ matches - they’ll be able to profit from them. BJJ is one of the fastest-growing sports globally, with hundreds of millions of viewers each year, yet it rema…
🔥10❤3🎉3
Your attention is an asset class. Why can't you trade it? Hours are spent every day in niche subreddits, Twitch chats, and Discord communities. Who is going to win the speedrun, who is going to drop the diss track, and which project is vaporware. But on traditional prediction markets, this knowledge is worthless. They only list the "Macro" events that Wall Street cares about. BaseCase changes the valuation model. …
❤11👏1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @basecasenews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 507,424 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@basecasenews named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BaseCase Announcements” (@basecasenews), 3,046 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/basecasenews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.