Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ⚫️ NAHJOB / Отзывы сотрудников

Channel

⚫️ NAHJOB / Отзывы сотрудников

@labour_market

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

962subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001509999123
TypeChannel
Username@labour_market
Created22 August 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/labour_market

Growth

962963962.57 August 2026 — 962 subscribers7 August 2026 — 962 subscribers7 August 2026 — 963 subscribers15 August 2026 — 962 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 9 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 962–963 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 19:16962-1
7 Aug 2026, 12:26963+1
7 Aug 2026, 05:31962no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:20962first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 25 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.1%
avg views ÷ 962 subscribers
Avg views / post
193
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.66%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held16 (25 June 20265 August 2026)
Views total965
Reactions total13
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 05:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

40 reactions across 11 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1025.0%
👏512.5%
😡512.5%
😢410.0%
37.50%
🤬37.50%
🥰37.50%
🔥25.00%
😨12.50%
😱12.50%
🤗12.50%
🤯12.50%
🥱12.50%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC92 viewsread 7 August 2026

Каждый третий россиянин угрожал увольнением, чтобы выбить прибавку к зарплате. В 60% случаев это срабатывает, и только 6% начальников сразу увольняют такого сотрудника, пишет РБК. @bankrollo

4 Aug 2026, 02:25 UTC140 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

теперь все так научились

👍6

25 Jul 2026, 03:38 UTC274 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

С этим аргументом босс точно не посмеет отказать в отпуске 😂

19 Jul 2026, 03:39 UTC348 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ejdailyruPhoto

Часть сотрудников склада Wildberries в Электростали не выпускали из корпусов во время пожара после атаки беспилотников, пишет издание "Пост" со ссылкой на сестру одного из пострадавших сотрудников: «У меня брат был на смене сегодня, неделю как устроился. У него шок, он еще не отошел, мы даем ему сейчас успокоительные. Его телефон, документы — все там осталось. Его там удерживала какая-то старшая. Он сказал, что она с

😡4🤬3

8 Jul 2026, 10:50 UTC400 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Россиян начали отпускать на удалёнку из-за дефицита топлива. @retailrus

🤯1

8 Jul 2026, 01:51 UTC349 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @igor_matvienko_rabota

«Пересмотр структуры», «фокус на ключевых проектах», «повышение эффективности» — словарь корпоративного новояза давно переведен на человеческий язык. Перевод звучит примерно так: денег на всех больше нет. Яндекс Маркет объявил о реструктуризации. Изменения затронут до 15% сотрудников, хотя компания обещает найти многим место внутри Яндекса. Еще недавно маркетплейсы жили по принципу: нанимай быстрее конкурентов, прибы

🔥1

5 Jul 2026, 04:42 UTC294 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @igor_matvienko_rabota

«ИИ скоро заменит программистов» — под этот лозунг Meta уволила около 8 тысяч сотрудников. Прошло несколько месяцев. И теперь Марк Цукерберг фактически признает: расчеты оказались ошибочными. AI-агенты развиваются значительно медленнее, чем ожидало руководство. Массовой замены инженеров не произошло. Получается неудобная картина. Тысячи людей потеряли работу не потому, что их действительно заменил искусственный ин

🥰3😱1

4 Jul 2026, 13:43 UTC273 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @igor_matvienko_rabota

Из интервью Натальи Зубаревич я бы вынес одну неприятную мысль. Эпоха, когда работодатели бегали за сотрудниками с пачкой денег, заканчивается. Теперь бегать, похоже, снова придется сотрудникам. Вспомнился один знакомый. В 2024 году он трижды менял работу за восемь месяцев: каждый раз +30–40 тысяч к зарплате, бонусы, удаленка. Говорил: «Зачем быть лояльным, если рынок платит?» В этом году позвонил. Уже четыре меся

1👏1🥱1😢1

2 Jul 2026, 04:00 UTC288 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @igor_matvienko_rabota

Посмотрел интервью главы HeadHunter. Хорошее интервью. Без истерики, без победных реляций. Но несколько вещей я бы уточнил. Во-первых, мне понравилось, что он говорит о скрытой безработице. Это действительно важная тема. Когда компания не увольняет человека, а сокращает часы, урезает премии или просто держит его "на лавке", статистика говорит: "человек работает". Экономика говорит: "спрос на труд упал". Это не новое

👏4

2 Jul 2026, 01:55 UTC250 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @igor_matvienko_rabota

Как ни прискорбно, но рынок труда в России напоминает затянувшийся концерт, где вместо классических мелодий звучат лишь фальшивые ноты. Из свежих отзывов работников видно, что многие компании, от «Боксит Тимана» до «Аэрокосмических Систем», продолжают откровенно пренебрегать основами трудового права, оставляя сотрудников без зарплат и с постоянной угрозой увольнения. Кажется, креативные подходы к управлению персонало

👍42

1 Jul 2026, 02:46 UTC282 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @igor_matvienko_rabota

Рынок труда в России напоминает некий абсурдистский театр, где главные роли играют некомпетентные руководители и обманутые работники. Совсем недавно, в одной из компаний, сотрудники узнали, что обещанные им премии – это всего лишь миф, который исчезает, как только они пытаются его поймать. Напоминает знаменитую песню The Rolling Stones "You Can't Always Get What You Want", не правда ли? Важно лишь, чтобы на выходе не

😢3😡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @labour_market. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“⚫️ NAHJOB / Отзывы сотрудников” (@labour_market), 962 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/labour_market.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.