2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 335–337 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 07:04
336
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:38
336
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 30 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
42.9%
avg views ÷ 336 subscribers
Avg views / post
144
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.94%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held
18 (30 December 2025 – 2 August 2026)
Views total
288
Reactions total
20
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 07:04 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
349
Videos
14
Links
266
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
344 reactions across 18 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
79
23.0%
🔥
59
17.2%
custom 5866369239740320716
57
16.6%
custom 5900059942462689010
34
9.88%
😁
27
7.85%
custom 6014656193975291723
20
5.81%
custom 5974150099708679853
17
4.94%
custom 5832702502935465153
13
3.78%
custom 5931374321384557692
12
3.49%
custom 5775916214874281431
6
1.74%
custom 5843887194774703137
5
1.45%
custom 5823187398028168504
4
1.16%
custom 5859495445230783591
4
1.16%
🤝
4
1.16%
custom 5985327773571354619
2
0.581%
👀
1
0.291%
Custom emoji. 11 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 344reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 30 December 2025 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
65
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 18 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
60
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kudrya_write. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 December 2025 to 2 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
5.56%
1 of 18 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
125
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
522
over 17 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 30 December 2025 to 2 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
// 24 сентября в Москве будет возвращение COINCRAFT SHOW — одного из самых популярных российских форумов по криптовалюте, инвестициям и трендам, но уже в новом формате 🤟
> Вместо классического формата конференции будет несколько крутых арт-пространств на ВДНХ, VIP Lounge с чайной церемонией, нетворкинг, стенды компаний, эксклюзивный мерч и Afterparty
> 1500+ участников
> 30+ спикеров
> 20+ компаний-партнеров
🎟 Ну …
Farewell, FIVA.
Today we're announcing that FIVA is winding down.
From the first market we launched, FIVA was our way of bringing fixed yield to TON - now the GRAM ecosystem. We're proud of what was built, and even prouder of the community that formed around it. Thank you for trusting us with your funds, testing every feature, and staying with us through it all.
We know it has been quiet here for a long time, and …
// Meanwhile... Progress?
В ноябре я писал, пожалуй, самый жёсткий пост про TON за всё время существования моего канала. Прошло несколько месяцев и мне стало интересно проверить, на этот раз свежим взглядом, что же изменилось 🥤
Цена на TON-GRAM все еще держиться в одном ценовом диапазоне, но теперь это другая монета, где нету страшного графика
Про DeFi, кажется, уже все окончательно забыли. Крупные команды, как MT…
// Graduated. New chapter is here. I'm so back 🤟
Примерно пять месяцев здесь было тихо. Не потому, что пропал интерес или закончились идеи. Просто в какой-то момент пришлось поставить всё на паузу и полностью уйти в учебы и подготовку к ЕГЭ. Хотелось достойно закрыть школьную главу и, кажется, получилось. Теперь я снова на связи
🥱 ᴋᴜᴅʀʏᴀ ᴨишᴇᴛ... // sᴜʙsᴄʀɪʙᴇ ɪɴ x // ᴄʜᴀᴛ
А это уже MTONGA или еще нет? Вам всем дали по бесплатному доллару за каждый TON на балансе... Даже я не могу об этом не написать 💰
🤔 ᴋᴜᴅʀʏᴀ ᴨишᴇᴛ... // sᴜʙsᴄʀɪʙᴇ ɪɴ x // ᴄʜᴀᴛ
Не, ну это позорище. Сначала пишут максимальная награда 75$, потом тем 4-ем занявшим первое место из 4271 eligible юзеров дают по 30.6$, которые еле окупают минус... Ну ладно, хоть +5$ на кфс насыпали 🤣
🤔 ᴋᴜᴅʀʏᴀ ᴨишᴇᴛ... // sᴜʙsᴄʀɪʙᴇ ɪɴ x // ᴄʜᴀᴛ
// Startegy #1 // Market rules' exploitation
Так как у меня сейчас очень много времени занимает учеба, я решил немного отложить постинг, но это нельзя пропускать
В общем, вчера утром проверил TONCO Predictions и заметил интересный маркет "Пробьют ли кепки Дурова 30k TON объёма на 7-ми дневном отрезке?"
Шансы на "Да" ≈ 25%, "Нет" ≈ 75%, ничего необычного. Но, опытный TONовчанин сразу пошел в market rules. Я заметил…
🎁Розыгрыш 10 новых Valentine's Bear и Heart для любимых подписчиков
Условия участия:
— поставить ❤️ на пост
— подписка на @kudrya_write, @utkaton и @opendu
Итоги в 21:00 мск
// Провел 11 часов подряд в наушниках, смотря BLAST Bounty по Counter Strike 2, параллельно чилил, потреблял колу и чипсики, готовил суши. Ни о чем не жалею..
Заработал 80$ на ставочках Polymarket во время турнира, максимально предсказуемый матч FUT vs Furia и абсолютно непонятный Vitality vs EYEBALLERS 💙
Хотите пост про рынок скинов CS2? Как прошли ваши выходные?
🤔 ᴋᴜᴅʀʏᴀ ᴨишᴇᴛ... // sᴜʙsᴄʀɪʙᴇ ɪɴ x // ᴄʜᴀᴛ
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @kudrya_write. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
// Как бы вы хотели это видеть? Готовлю инфу по 15 стратегиям по заработку на полимаркет + базу по нему, дропу, UMA, конкурентах и т.п. 💙
Серия из нескольких постов60%
1-2 Лонгрида40%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 30 December 2025 to 2 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 495,216 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@kudrya_write named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@opendu named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ᴋᴜᴅʀʏᴀ ᴨишᴇᴛ...” (@kudrya_write), 336 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kudrya_write.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
