Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Рома, давай! Блог предпринимателя

Channel

Рома, давай! Блог предпринимателя

@kubanevroman

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,625subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001352538191
TypeChannel
Username@kubanevroman
Created21 January 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kubanevroman

Growth

1,6211,6251,6237 August 2026 — 1,625 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,625 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,621 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,625 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 10 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,620–1,626 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 20:271,625+4
14 Aug 2026, 14:161,621-4
7 Aug 2026, 11:011,625no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:541,625first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 25 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.5%
avg views ÷ 1,625 subscribers
Avg views / post
301
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.88%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held18 (25 March 20267 August 2026)
Views total2,107
Reactions total187
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
37s
Average length
37s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

560 reactions across 18 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
22940.9%
👍11620.7%
💯6812.1%
🔥6311.3%
😁508.93%
😭81.43%
😍71.25%
🤣61.07%
40.714%
🎉20.357%
🏆20.357%
😱20.357%
🤔20.357%
🕊10.179%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 560reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 25 March 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kubanevroman. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 March 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 06:38 UTC118 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Зачем вообще что-то планировать в такое турбулентное время? Всю неделю был в командировке. Много думал. Поделюсь на примере мыслей про сына. Максу 12 лет. И у него необычное увлечение. Он по собственному желанию читает книги про основы ядерной физики... Знает устройство реакторов, интересуется атомной энергетикой, все разговоры только про это. Мы сели обсуждать, может ли это однажды стать профессией. Получилось тр

11👍7🔥3💯1

29 Jul 2026, 05:35 UTC253 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Почему так важны смыслы Вчера утром спарринговал. После, уже за кофе, разбирал свою технику и ощущения. И поймал одну мысль, которая, как мне кажется, больше про управление, чем про бокс. Поделюсь. Часто новички в боксе, когда приходит время встать в спарринг, думают что будет страшно пропустить удар. Никто не любит получать по голове и корпусу. Это пугает, вызывает стресс. Все логично. Но на самом все чуть иначе.

10👍4💯2🔥2

27 Jul 2026, 08:04 UTC267 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Проблемы Выходные, баня - а значит, было время подумать! Меня очень расстраивает отношение многих людей вокруг к проблемам. Как будто у нас сформировался какой-то культурный код по этой теме. В политике. Во многих бизнесах. Да и просто в жизни. Само слово «проблема» почему-то считается чуть ли не признаком слабости. Хотя со стороны уже видно: все, треш и агония. А мы продолжаем: «Никаких проблем нет! Есть просто

💯113😁21👍1

24 Jul 2026, 07:30 UTC330 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Непопулярное мнение про тренировки. Простите. Если вы хотя бы чуть погружены в мир спорта, а тем более в бег или триатлон, то наверняка слышали, что САМОЕ важное в нашем деле - тренироваться в зоне 2. Эту мысль повторяют как мантру все вокруг. А значит- надо вставить свои 5 копеек)) Что пишут про эту волшебную зону 2: • Хотите здоровое сердце? Зона 2. • Хотите поднять VO2max? Зона 2. • Хотите жить долго? Снова она.

👍97💯6🏆1

21 Jul 2026, 16:53 UTC348 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Главный спонсор моих 13 тыс шагов каждый день! У меня сегодня все! Пока 👋

20😍7🔥2

20 Jul 2026, 07:14 UTC408 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Добавка №1 (неочевидный выбор) Что-то давно не писал про свои ЗОЖ-эксперименты. На выходных читал исследования и снова поймал себя на мысли, насколько маркетинг умеет уводить нас в сторону... Что вижу, когда в целом эксперты пишу про САМЫЕ полезные добавки: • Омега 3, • Поливитамины, • Ежовик, • Ашваганда и тд. В целом, оно конечно и не вредит, но и пользы там кратно меньше чем в одной простой и дешевой добавке. И

👍25🔥87💯1🕊1

19 Jul 2026, 15:53 UTC383 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Воскресное бубубу Отвлеку вас от складов WB, бензина и чемпионата мира, уж простите. Сейчас смотрю сериал "Ферма Кларксона". Если вдруг не видели: Джереми Кларксон (бывший легендарный ведущий легендарного Top Gear) решил заняться фермерством и построить на этом настоящий бизнес. Не буду хвалить юмор, атмосферу Англии и тд Тут все на 10 из 10. Меня зацепило другое: как будто снимали про меня! Каждая серия начинает

20👍10😁4🔥1

14 Jul 2026, 07:29 UTC471 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Реальность 2026-го Утро вторника. Приехал на остатках бензина (заправлял по 160р за литр) в кофейню, чтобы поймать интернет, которого нет. Под звуки сирены обсуждали с товарищем внедрение AI-агентов в категорийку, программу лояльности и продажи. 2 параллельные реальности.

😁20😭8💯7🤣2😱2

1 Jul 2026, 07:21 UTC629 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Базовый минимум Вчера встречался с двумя предпринимателями из нашей отрасли. Как обычно, начали не с бизнеса. Начали с политики 😅 Наверное, многие слышали один из главных тезисов этой недели от партии - «базовый минимум». Обсуждали, что это может означать для бизнеса и, главное, что с этим делать. Поделюсь своими мыслями. Меня всегда немного раздражают ролики из серии: "лучшие бизнесы в кризис" Что значит "лучшие"?

14💯6👍4🤔2

11 Jun 2026, 08:19 UTC539 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026

ИИ, вайбкодинг и будущее. Размышлял на пробежке про ИИ и навыки, которые будут цениться в ближайшие годы. Если посмотреть на историю, то первая промышленная революция резко сократила потребность в физическом труде. Появились станки, заводы, техника. До этого ценились кто? люди сильные, выносливые и работящие. После этого на первый план вышли предприниматели, инженеры, изобретатели. Стали цениться идеи, инновации и

23💯7👍5

3 Jun 2026, 13:10 UTC467 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Деградация или развитие? Есть два простых тезиса: 1. Мы деградируем, когда долго делаем одно и то же. 2. Мы развиваемся, когда регулярно делаем что-то новое. Сегодня на пробежке задумался: а что нового я сделал за последние 3 месяца? Получился интересный список: • вернулся в бокс и открыл для себя новый источник кайфа; • был в 5 регионах в командировках; • провел более 50 встреч с незнакомыми людьми, клиентами,

👍95🔥41

26 May 2026, 11:23 UTC510 views27 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вчера выступал перед новой для себя аудиторией. Полный зал предпринимателей из сферы ивентов. Яркие, харизматичные, открытые. Очень понравилось. У меня был всего час. Пытался коротко поговорить о том, как сохранять себя, лидерство и свое состояние в это непростое время. Аудитория - думающая, живая, активная. Много вопросов. И знаете, что подумал? Мы живем во время, когда информации стало слишком много. Очень мн

14👍5💯4🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @kubanevroman. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,089,146 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Рома, давай! Блог предпринимателя” (@kubanevroman), 1,625 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kubanevroman.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.