Channel
@kts_specials
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
552subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003067039749 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kts_specials |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kts_specials |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:16 | 552 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 549 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 30 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (30 June 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,607 |
| Reactions total | 153 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 19:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
285 reactions across 9 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 111 | 38.9% | |
| ❤ | 103 | 36.1% | |
| 👏 | 36 | 12.6% | |
| 👍 | 13 | 4.56% | |
| 🥰 | 8 | 2.81% | |
| 😭 | 6 | 2.11% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 1.75% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 0.702% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.351% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 285reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Появление геймдизайнеров в продуктовых командах — маркер того, как изменился рынок Раньше профессия ассоциировалась только с геймдевом. Сегодня же специалистов можно встретить в банках, ритейле, EdTech, HR, финтехе и других цифровых продуктах. О чём это говорит? Бизнес перестал воспринимать геймификацию как набор игровых элементов. Чтобы механика действительно работала, нужен человек, который проектирует весь игро…
❤7👍2🔥1
Поймать удачу за крылышко: запустили «Баскет Удачи» вместе с ROSTIC`S! Придумали и собрали механику в приложении ROSTIC`S, которая превращает заказ в увлекательное путешествие. Перед нами стояла задача запустить масштабное федеральное промо, мотивировать пользователей делать больше заказов, чаще возвращаться в приложение и выбирать позиции из спецменю. Схема простая: заказываешь курочку, получаешь билеты и крутишь …
🔥12❤10👏7
Не хотим никого пугать… но до конца лета остался всего месяц ⏳ Если вы ждали идеального знака, чтобы забыть о задачах и уйти в отпуск, считайте, это он. Мы как раз собрали сет аватарок под любое отпускное настроение, чтобы коллеги сразу поняли, что вас не стоит беспокоить. Выбирайте свой вайб и бегом отдыхать 🌊
🔥18❤8😭6😁1
Posted without readable text
🔥11❤7😁4
«Монстропланетяне» в «Магните»: из космоса в офлайн 🛸 Вместе с коллегами из «Магнита» разработали геймификацию, которая подталкивает зайти в приложение, а оттуда — заглянуть в большие форматы сети. За счёт чего работает: ▫️ Ежедневный азарт. В центре игры автомат-хватайка, в котором каждый день можно вытащить капсулу с призом: купоны на скидки и товары за 1 ₽ и выгоду в магазинах Магнит Семейный, Экстра и Доставке…
❤14👍6👏5
Почему на каждом втором брифе рано или поздно просят одни и те же механики? — «Давайте колесо фортуны» — «А может, три в ряд?» — «Нам 5 букв, как у Т-Банка» — «Или кликер, как Hamster Kombat» Но действительно ли эти они настолько универсальны? Или существует романтизация их успеха? Порассуждала об этом в небольшой статье, без попытки найти единственно правильный ответ. Если у вас есть свои примеры таких частых зап…
🔥20❤9👏5
Какая пара крепче в шоу «Ставка на любовь»? 💔 Наш фаворит: узнаваемая механика + элемент риска. Именно эта связка дала идеальное вовлечение в in-app игре для приложения «Пятница! Пульт». Уже 17 июля реалити-шоу завершается, а мы с «Пятницей!» как раз подводим итоги. Нам удалось поддерживать стабильный интерес к проекту на протяжении всех 8 недель! Делимся красивыми результатами: ▫️187 тысяч раз пользователи прошли…
❤21🔥10🥰5
Красивые итоги недели 🏆 Вслед за Рейтингом Рунета радуемся свежим данным от Workspace 2026: 🔴2 место в рейтинге геймдев-студий (уже не первый год держимся в топ-3), а в сфере e-com мы первые! 🥇 🔴Вошли в топ-30 диджитал-агентств. И в отраслевых отметились: залетели в топ-3 сразу в 7 сферах! От HoReCa и ритейла до финтеха, строительства и развлечений. Особенно приятно смотреть на такую динамику: уверенно растем из …
🔥19👏9👍5🥰3
Рейтинг Рунета опубликовал итоги, и в новом рейтинге по геймификации мы заняли 3 место! 🏆 Для нас это не просто строчка в рейтинге. Это наша ежедневная работа, которую коллеги из РР оценили так высоко на уровне рынка. Нам, разумеется, очень приятно. Спасибо команде, которая прикладывает столько усилий и души в проекты и их пользу для бизнеса, и нашим партнерам за доверие к смелым идеям. Дальше — больше! 💚
❤27🔥20👏10🎉2😱1
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @kts_specials. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 279,661 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Геймификация: игра на результат” (@kts_specials), 552 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kts_specials.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.