Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Константин Сонин

@ksonin

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

9,128subscribers

-22 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001350883921
TypeChannel
Username@ksonin
Created25 August 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ksonin

Growth

9,1289,1509,1396 August 2026 — 9,150 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,143 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,141 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,128 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,125–9,153 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 07:529,128-13
9 Aug 2026, 13:119,141-2
6 Aug 2026, 20:579,143-7
6 Aug 2026, 03:349,150first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
42.1%
avg views ÷ 9,128 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,850
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.99%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 21 of 24 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held24 (16 July 202610 August 2026)
Views total92,290
Reactions total1,612
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 15:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
821
Videos
23
Links
448

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1,505 reactions across 19 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
56537.5%
👍49332.8%
🔥28018.6%
👎473.12%
👏452.99%
😁442.92%
🤔191.26%
🤯60.399%
🥰30.199%
🤬20.133%
😱10.066%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,612reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 10:52 UTC≈1,920 views40 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ПОТЕРИ РОССИЯН Понятно, что когда сгорает склад Вайлдберрис с товарами на миллиарды рублей, эти миллиарды потеряны. Ровно эта сумма вычитается из экономики России. Но кто именно их потерял - это более сложный вопрос. Вот - основной экономический механизм, как потери конкретных владельцев компании и множества бизнесов, потерявших там товары, "размазываются" на все 140 миллионов россиян: https://theins.ru/news/295866.

👍352🔥2👎1

10 Aug 2026, 10:06 UTC≈1,940 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ПОПУЛЯРНАЯ ПОЛИТИКА В очередном выпуске нашего подкаста "Популярная Америка" на @RFERL обсуждали Роберта Кеннеди, родившегося знаменитым, перепробовавшего самые идиотские хобби и увлечения, благо многомиллионное наследство позволяло, и вдруг оказавшегося, после всех приключений, министром здравоохранения/клоуном у президента Трампа. Как знамя борцов с вакцинами - и, больше, как знамя борцов с "экспертным классом",

👍135👎2

7 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC≈2,850 views95 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Конечно, в России в 2026 нет никаких реальных выборов. Участие "Яблока" будет всячески использоваться пропагандой для поддержания мифа о популярности Путина и войны. Но если голос за "Яблоко" - просто высказывание в пользу мира, то что ж плохого. России нужен мир.

🔥5223👍15🥰3👎1😁1

6 Aug 2026, 09:24 UTC≈3,040 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ЧЕСТНОЕ СЛОВО Разговор про украинские удары по Вайлдбериз, начатый в понедельник в "Полном Альбаце", продолжился в среду на "Популярной политике": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=seYBOl4ktyc. Так же продолжился разговор про Мельниченко и предпринимателей, которые как жаворонки. Жаворонки поют не потому, что любят петь. Предприниматели общаются с Путиным не потому что поклоняются мудакам или любят разбойников, а пото

👍23👎1

5 Aug 2026, 15:29 UTC≈3,150 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ПОЛНЫЙ АЛЬБАЦ Эволюционируют режимы, меняются люди, но "Полный Альбац" с Yevgenia M. Albats всегда по понедельникам, 20-00 по Москве. В этот раз мы обсуждали украинские удары по складам Вайлдберис. А также знаменитое обращение предпринимателя Мельниченко, опубликованное журналом The Economist. У меня есть своя собственная версия, кому это письмо. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQP15Nw-gQw

👍116👎3🔥3

2 Aug 2026, 06:45 UTC≈3,580 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ПОПУЛЯРНАЯ ПОЛИТИКА В подкасте "Популярная политика" продолжаем обсуждать с Valentin Baryshnikov вопросы американской политики. После острых тем антисемитизма и "Одиссея", про которые мы говорили в прошлые разы, в этот раз были стандартные вопросы демократической политики. Как у них там, "большое одеяло", на кого хватает в Мичигане, а на кого в Нью-Йорке? Впрочем, начали мы с визита президента Украины Зеленского: ht

👍156👎3

1 Aug 2026, 10:35 UTC≈3,590 views57 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ИИ В НАУКЕ Получил неожиданно много откликов, оффлайн, на свой пост про искусственный интеллект в преподавании. Поскольку я там не написал никакого ответа на вопросы, которые перед нами всеми, учителями и профессорами, стоят, это (реакция), очевидно, отражает то же напряжение и неопределенность, которая хорошо чувствуется в профессиональном сообществе. В чистой науке ещё темнее. Я никогда не видел такого разброса

39👍12🤔5👎1

30 Jul 2026, 18:09 UTC≈2,700 views98 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @durov_russiaPhoto

😈

🔥47😁33👍162

30 Jul 2026, 18:09 UTC≈3,280 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Мысль в целом понятна

3👍3👎1

28 Jul 2026, 21:06 UTC≈4,310 views144 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

КОНКУРЕНЦИЯ Хотите знать, что такое по-настоящему устойчивая система выборов? Это такая система, при которой оппозиция может победить, если набирает чуть-чуть больше 50%. Если время от времени не побеждает оппозиция, то это не демократия. Но тест устойчивости - это именно выборы 50 на 50. За последние тридцать лет такие ситуации были в Румынии, в Польше, в других странах. Но вот такого как в Перу не было, по-моему,

69👍51🔥15🤔8👎1

28 Jul 2026, 09:45 UTC≈3,860 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ОДИССЕЙ, РОДРИ И ДРУГИЕ КУЛЬТУРНЫЕ СОБЫТИЯ НЕДЕЛИ Наш подкаст с Валентином Барышниковым на "Радио Свобода" посвящен американской политике, но в новом выпуске мы говорим о центральных культурных событиях момента - воук и антивоук войнах, Нолане, сборной Испании: https://www.svoboda.org/a/33800602.html.

12👍5👎2

26 Jul 2026, 15:53 UTC≈4,140 views182 reactionsread 12 August 2026

МАКАРЕВИЧ Вчера Андрей Макаревич пел в Дзинтари, а я думал вот о чём. В 2011 году группа творческих лидеров моего поколения, квартет "И" и другие талантливые люди, сняли фильм "О чём говорят мужчины". И этот фильм был так чудесно сделан и так попал в волну, что в моей референтной группе стал примерно чем-то вроде "Двенадцати стульев" для шестидесятников. Источником цитат и смыслов на все случаи жизни. Потом наступ

94👍57👏16👎9😁4🤬2

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @ksonin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 684,193 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q4428814 on Wikidata, read 9 August 2026
LabelKonstantin Sonin
DescriptionRussian economist
X / Twitter@k_sonin

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Константин Сонин” (@ksonin), 9,128 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ksonin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.