Channel
@koreannftmint
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
107subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001550847993 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @koreannftmint |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/koreannftmint |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:17 | 107 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:56 | 107 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 4 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
75 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 39 | 52.0% | |
| 😭 | 7 | 9.33% | |
| ⚡ | 6 | 8.00% | |
| ✍ | 6 | 8.00% | |
| 👀 | 6 | 8.00% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 6.67% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 4.00% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 4.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 75reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2025 to 23 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
hodl pinned «안녕하세요 호들입니다 기억하실지 모르겠지만 전에 솔라나 밈코인 관련 정보 공유 하던 사람입니다. 그런데 갑자기 지난 1월 컴퓨터 전체가 해킹을 당해 텔레그램, 트위터 계정 등도 모두 해커가 소유권을 가져가서 제 명의로 계속 피해자를 만들려고 하더라구요 그러다 어제 우연히 해킹당했던 이 계정으로 다시 접속할 수 있게 되었습니다. 해킹을 당한 이후 거의 1년동안 코접 했었는데요, 사실 한순간에 큰 돈을 잃은 상실감도 있었지만 당시 나름 잘 되가던 트위터와 텔레그램…»
안녕하세요 호들입니다 기억하실지 모르겠지만 전에 솔라나 밈코인 관련 정보 공유 하던 사람입니다. 그런데 갑자기 지난 1월 컴퓨터 전체가 해킹을 당해 텔레그램, 트위터 계정 등도 모두 해커가 소유권을 가져가서 제 명의로 계속 피해자를 만들려고 하더라구요 그러다 어제 우연히 해킹당했던 이 계정으로 다시 접속할 수 있게 되었습니다. 해킹을 당한 이후 거의 1년동안 코접 했었는데요, 사실 한순간에 큰 돈을 잃은 상실감도 있었지만 당시 나름 잘 되가던 트위터와 텔레그램 채널 활동이 모두 날라가 이에 대한 현타가 크게 왔던거 같습니다. 계정을 다시 찾은 이후 기존 공지방을 계속 운영할까도 생각해봤지만, 이미 스팸 메시지로 너무 얼룩진데다가 추후 잡을때 증거자료로 쓰일 수 있는 기록들도 일부 있어서 최대한 원래 상태로 보존하고 싶어 새로운 공지방을 만들었…
✍1😭1
solana 200 > eth historical ath > If an alt feeds > it automatically feeds nft projects or memecoins > see a lot of degens being created and also a cool one on eth
❤3🙏2👀1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤3👀1
im trying to change my tactics and buy a lot fewer coins than before - the result is still very encouraging, the win rate has risen to 60% the most expensive and popular mistake is overtrading, take care of your money
❤4⚡2🔥2👀1
https://t.me/+epNam3BrFHowZjE1 OUR DAO ON TELEGRAM! JOIN US!
❤5👀1
연구끝에 진짜 박사가 되버린남자 소확... LASER PARTY 리더보드 1등 https://x.com/DeathFunGame/status/1947301249377825089/photo/1
❤4👀1
snowstorm: 인터넷 자유의 미래를 열다 > 인터넷 검열 시대에 Snowstorm이 등장! 분산형 마이크로프록시 네트워크로 자유, 프라이버시, 보안을 강화하세요. Snowflake V2 버전으로, 사용자들이 서로 도와 글로벌 인터넷에 자유롭게 접근할 수 있게 합니다 > 차단 콘텐츠 우회? 네! 지역 제한을 뚫고 원하는 콘텐츠에 접근하세요. 커뮤니티 기반으로 자원봉사자들이 연결 공유 > 참여 방법? 앱 다운로드 후 설치! 자원봉사자로 실행하면 피어 네트워크에 기여. VPN처럼 쓰되, 더 강력하고 분산형 > discord | X | website
❤5🔥1
http://axiom.trade/@h000dl > this is the only cat that gave me food > the other cats either got mad or went into the negative > 😼
❤3🙏1
Im sizing into $nub cat Probably can go to 30-40 mil again, maybe higher.
⚡2👀1
You didn’t full port? Ngmi
❤2
Took some profits, will let the rest run
❤4⚡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @koreannftmint. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“hodl” (@koreannftmint), 107 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/koreannftmint.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.