Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for محافظ کانال کولایز

Channel

محافظ کانال کولایز

@kolyze

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

488subscribers

-31,352 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001397896586
TypeChannel
Username@kolyze
CreatedBetween 1 November 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held36
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/kolyze

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@kolyze/26525 · this entry12 Oct 2026, 14:40 UTC@vesta_academyy/788312 Oct 2026, 15:08 UTC1.0028 minutes
@kolyze/26529 · this entry13 Oct 2026, 02:25 UTC@vesta_academyy/789013 Oct 2026, 02:51 UTC1.0027 minutes
@kolyze/26582 · this entry15 Oct 2026, 14:26 UTC@vesta_academyy/796315 Oct 2026, 16:02 UTC1.001.6 hours
@kolyze/26613 · this entry16 Oct 2026, 16:02 UTC@vesta_academyy/799516 Oct 2026, 16:51 UTC1.0049 minutes
@kolyze/26667 · this entry18 Oct 2026, 17:12 UTC@vesta_academyy/804918 Oct 2026, 18:15 UTC1.0064 minutes
@kolyze/26668 · this entry18 Oct 2026, 17:20 UTC@vesta_academyy/805018 Oct 2026, 18:15 UTC1.0055 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@vesta_academyy11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0058 minutesthis entry (11–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 431 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 2 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

46731,84016,153.57 August 2026 — 31,840 subscribers7 August 2026 — 31,830 subscribers8 August 2026 — 31,747 subscribers9 August 2026 — 31,683 subscribers10 August 2026 — 31,608 subscribers11 August 2026 — 31,524 subscribers12 August 2026 — 31,475 subscribers13 August 2026 — 31,419 subscribers14 August 2026 — 31,316 subscribers16 August 2026 — 467 subscribers23 August 2026 — 492 subscribers29 August 2026 — 500 subscribers17 September 2026 — 498 subscribers2 October 2026 — 492 subscribers13 October 2026 — 31,635 subscribers14 October 2026 — 31,529 subscribers15 October 2026 — 31,441 subscribers16 October 2026 — 31,366 subscribers17 October 2026 — 31,308 subscribers18 October 2026 — 31,261 subscribers19 October 2026 — 31,192 subscribers20 October 2026 — 31,124 subscribers21 October 2026 — 31,074 subscribers22 October 2026 — 30,991 subscribers23 October 2026 — 30,908 subscribers24 October 2026 — 30,843 subscribers25 October 2026 — 30,765 subscribers26 October 2026 — 30,695 subscribers27 October 2026 — 30,641 subscribers28 October 2026 — 30,583 subscribers29 October 2026 — 30,505 subscribers30 October 2026 — 30,451 subscribers31 October 2026 — 30,385 subscribers1 November 2026 — 30,295 subscribers2 November 2026 — 479 subscribers10 November 2026 — 488 subscribers4887 August 202610 November 2026
36 measurements spanning 95 days, net -31,352. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 14:36488+9
2 Nov 2026, 16:01479-29,816
1 Nov 2026, 12:3930,295-90
31 Oct 2026, 09:2030,385-66
30 Oct 2026, 07:5130,451-54
29 Oct 2026, 08:5830,505-78
28 Oct 2026, 05:5730,583-58
27 Oct 2026, 09:1830,641-54
26 Oct 2026, 11:3630,695-70
25 Oct 2026, 09:0930,765-78
24 Oct 2026, 06:4930,843-65
23 Oct 2026, 08:3630,908-83
22 Oct 2026, 11:0630,991-83
21 Oct 2026, 05:3031,074-50
20 Oct 2026, 05:4831,124-68
19 Oct 2026, 06:1831,192-69
18 Oct 2026, 03:0631,261-47
17 Oct 2026, 06:1031,308-58
16 Oct 2026, 09:4531,366-75
15 Oct 2026, 11:5931,441first reading

Engagement

695 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
220.3%
avg views ÷ 488 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,080
440 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.09%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
442
of 695 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026
Posts held695 (6 August 2026 – 2 November 2026)
Views total473,026
Reactions total14,599
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Nov 2026, 10:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
46m 22s
Average length
3m 34s

Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

26,760 reactions across 693 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤12,40346.3%
😁3,73414.0%
👍2,6119.76%
❤‍🔥2,2388.36%
💔1,6706.24%
🤝7752.90%
😢7082.65%
😍4511.69%
🤔4071.52%
🤯3971.48%
🔥3681.38%
👏1990.744%
💋1480.553%
💘1080.404%
🌚950.355%
👌930.348%
😎670.25%
😱560.209%
👻510.191%
💯510.191%
9 further kinds1300.486%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 693 of the 695 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26,760 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 695 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 693 we hold a reading for · 0.4%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kolyze. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 695 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 2 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 62 of 442 posts held from the last 30 days (14.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

2 Nov 2026, 10:24 UTC204 views1 reactionsread 2 November 2026

Posted without readable text

❤1

Signed Amirreza@kolyze

2 Nov 2026, 08:54 UTC451 views14 reactionsread 2 November 2026

محتوا ❌ شاهکار ✅ وویس های آرینو منم گوش میدم انقد دیتا های عجیب و جالبی داره یچیزیم بگم راجع به جمله پایانیش که راز افزایش درصد و ترازاتوته : کنکور مسابقه بیشتر خوندن نیست، مسابقه بهتر تثبیت کردنه! ما یه چنین چیزیو نه فقط برای دروس حفظیاتی برای همه دروس داریم الخصوص دروس ریاضیاتی (همه رشته ها و حتی گسسته هندسه) اینکه دو هفته زمان گذاشتید یه مطلب رو به تعداد کافی تست زدید حتما یه بخشی هم باید بزارید برای خودتون که بب…

❤12❤‍🔥2

Signed Ali@kolyze

2 Nov 2026, 05:09 UTC611 views12 reactionsread 2 November 2026
File

فکر می‌کنی مشکلت فراموشیه؟ 🙂 سخت در اشتباهی! 🙂 خیلی وقت‌ها مشکل این نیست که مطالب یادت میره؛ مشکل اینه که مغزت وسطِ خوندنِ مباحثِ جدید، مغزت دچار یه ارور کوچیک میشه که .... عضویت در کانال کولایز: 💎 @kolyze ثبت‌نام مشاوره تخصصی: 🏛 @kolyze_hq

❤10❤‍🔥1🐳1

Signed Arian@kolyze

2 Nov 2026, 04:43 UTC618 views16 reactionsread 2 November 2026
Photo

دیدی هرچی جلوتر میری، حس می‌کنی مطالب قبلی دارن توی مه محو میشن؟ 😓 🤔 علتش چیه؟ 🙂 چیکار کنیم این اتفاق نیوفته؟

👍11❤4❤‍🔥1

Signed Arian@kolyze

2 Nov 2026, 02:24 UTC679 views44 reactionsread 2 November 2026
Video

وضعیت بچه ها توی بودجه شیمی این آزمون 😅 صبحتون بخیر 💙

😁38❤4👍1👾1

Signed Arian@kolyze

1 Nov 2026, 17:52 UTC881 views20 reactionsread 2 November 2026
Photo

🔙یک مورد خیلی موثبتی که درباره مشاوراا وجود داره ، آموزش مستمر هستش! ♾️خیلی مهمه که دانش آموز در راه خودش به موفقیت تو کنکور برسه نه راه مشاورش! ☕یعنی چی؟ 🟠یعنی فرض کن مشاور تو رتبه برتری هستش که میاد منابعشو بهت معرفی میکنه ، روش خوندشو بهت میگه و کمکت میکنه ، این مشاورو از من بشنو و بنداز سطل اشغال!!! ✔️مشاور درست و اصولی اونی هستش که راه خودش نه ، بلکه راه دانش آموزو پیدا کنه و در راه خود اون دانش آموز اونو به…

❤18😍2

Signed محمدرضا قلی‌زاده

1 Nov 2026, 17:45 UTC836 views17 reactionsread 2 November 2026

☕به قول دکتر رضا بابایی : انسان همیشه باید درحال آموزش و یادگیری باشه

👍13⚡2❤1💔1

Signed محمدرضا قلی‌زاده

1 Nov 2026, 15:45 UTC930 views20 reactionsread 2 November 2026

فکر نکن باید با همون یکی دوبار خوندن درسا بهشون مسلط بشی اصلا ما تو خود روز کنکور بعد چندین و چند بار خوندن مباحث و تست و ... باز هم به اون تسلط آرمانی مدنظر نمیرسیم اوکی فکر میکنی تو اون مطالب تسلط پایینی داری؟ به جای دوباره خوانی و افتادن تو چرخه باطل اون، با تست زنی افزایش تسلط بده همون قدر که توهم تسلط میتونه باعث شکست بشه، رفتار آرمانی تو تسلط هم باعث شکسته

❤16❤‍🔥3💯1

Signed Amirreza@kolyze

1 Nov 2026, 15:41 UTC934 views20 reactionsread 2 November 2026

با اینکه میخوای با مشاور ادامه بدی یا نه کاری ندارم چون اون یه تصمیم دیگست و اصلا دنیاش متفاوته ولی نکته اصلی تو ذهنیتته اینکه میخوای دوباره اون درسارو بخونی بدون تعارف میگم با این ذهنیت میوفتی تو چرخه دوباره خوانی و وسواس و ... یهو دی ماه چشتو باز میکنی میبینی نتونستی پیشروی مناسبی داشته باشی از اون طرفم پایه رو با اینکه چند بار خوندی نتونستی به تسلط مدنظرت برسی بعد دوباره از بهمن میوفتی تو چرخه دوباره خوانی وسواس…

❤18❤‍🔥1💘1

Signed Amirreza@kolyze

1 Nov 2026, 15:31 UTC892 views13 reactionsread 2 November 2026

📩 پیام از سمت : خستگی 👤 آیدی کاربر : #e5OTQE1Fbw 📨 تعداد کل پیام‌های کاربر : 3 ✍️سلام وقت بخیر من مشاوره داشتم و الانم دارم ولی خب راضی نیستم و میخوام کنسلش کنم و همچنین حس سردرگمی و اینا دارم؛ من پایه دهم و یازدهم رو تو تابستون خوندم حتی بعضی از درساشو چندبار خوندم ولی میخوام اونا رو دوباره بخونم چون مرور کافی نداشتم و پراکنده خوندم و حتی خودمم میتونم بدون مشاور جلو برم ولی خب استرس دارم بنظرتون کنسل کردن مشاور و بد…

❤13

Signed Amirreza@kolyze

1 Nov 2026, 14:10 UTC898 views16 reactionsread 2 November 2026
Voice message

از کجا بفهمیم یه درسی رو یاد میگیریم؟

❤12❤‍🔥3💯1

Signed Amirreza@kolyze

1 Nov 2026, 14:03 UTC915 views18 reactionsread 2 November 2026

‌ سلام کولایز خسته نباشید چجوری بفهمیم داریم درسو یاد میگیریم و مسیر درسته؟ با تست زدن؟ خب از ۱۵ تا تست فیزیک فقط ۴ تا درست بزنی چی🫠

❤16😁2

Signed Amirreza@kolyze

Showing the 12 most recent of 695 posts we hold for @kolyze. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@kolyze edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
28 October 2026

Polls

The 6 most recent of 10 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

29 Oct 2026, 09:57 UTCAnonymous Poll231 voters

تا الان چند ساعت خوندین بچه‌ها جون؟🧚‍♀️

  1. هیچی نخوندم 🚶‍♀️24%
  2. ۱ تا ۲ ساعت 🫴12%
  3. ۲ تا ۳ ساعت 🤏13%
  4. ۳ تا ۴ ساعت ✌️13%
  5. ۴ تا ۵ ساعت ☝️12%
  6. ۵ تا ۶ ساعت 🤙5%
  7. از بچه‌های ۴۰۵ای هستم🤝27%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

26 Oct 2026, 04:31 UTCAnonymous Poll197 voters

بچه ها بعد از آزمون، آزمون رو تحلیل میکنید؟

  1. آره قطعا تحلیل میکنم60%
  2. نه یا حوصلم‌ نمی‌کشه یا می‌ترسم که با نتایجش مواجه بشم و به بررسی عدد درصد ها بسنده میکنم43%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

22 Oct 2026, 10:11 UTCAnonymous Poll291 voters

تا الان چه کردین بچه‌ها؟!🐣

  1. زیر دو ساعت15%
  2. دو سه ساعتی خوندما23%
  3. چهار پنج سااعت14%
  4. برو پنج به بالا7%
  5. هیچی والا:)45%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

21 Oct 2026, 09:32 UTCAnonymous Poll273 voters

تا الان چند ساعت بچه‌ها جون؟!💕

  1. زیر دو ساعت9%
  2. دو تا سه ساعت21%
  3. چهار تا پنج ساعت12%
  4. بالای پنج ساعت4%
  5. هیچی هیچی🫩37%
  6. تازه از مدرسه اومدم میخونم🙂‍↔️20%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

20 Oct 2026, 10:50 UTCAnonymous Poll303 voters

بچه ها چه کردین تا الان؟

  1. هنوز شروع نکردم تازه رسیدم45%
  2. ۱ الی ۲ ساعت15%
  3. ۲ الی ۳ ساعت13%
  4. ۳ الی ۴ ساعت13%
  5. بالای ۴ ساعت17%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

19 Oct 2026, 06:55 UTCAnonymous Poll132 voters

براش شما کدوم درس اینطوریه؟!👀

  1. شیمی26%
  2. فیزیک34%
  3. زیست11%
  4. ریاضی55%

The shares total 126%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 695 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 2 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

مدیکال استوز | مشاوره کنکور
@medicalstus_ir · 150,021
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 August 2026
مشاوره کنکور رندو | سروش جباری
@randoteam · 468,298
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 10 August 2026
نوتروفیل | مشاوره کنکور
@NOTRUPHIL · 353,015
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
محافظ کانال دلتاکنکور
@deltakonkurr · 4,304
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
آكادمی آموزشی-مشاوره‌ای دكتر قنبری
@drghanbariii · 102,510
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026
کنکور دانشگاه فرهنگیان
@Resane_Farhangian · 147,796
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
دکتر سهرابی مفرد|رتبه ۴کنکور
@dr_sohrabimofrad_4 · 288,990
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
سیب ترش | آموزش و مشاوره کنکور
@siiibtorsh_official · 525,678
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 August 2026
📚 کتابخونه کنکور 📚
@Library_Konkor · 369,893
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
FILEAZ | فایلاز آزمون های آزمایشی رایگان
@fileaz · 171,843
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“محافظ کانال کولایز” (@kolyze), 488 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kolyze.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.