Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -334. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 104,812–105,246 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 09:14
104,862
-334
11 Aug 2026, 09:46
105,196
first reading
Engagement
61 posts held, back to 10 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.93%
avg views ÷ 104,862 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,030
61 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.364%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
61
of 61 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 59 of 61 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
61 (10 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
123,738
Reactions total
436
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 21:58 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈10,300
Videos
≈2,640
Links
≈559
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
22s
Average length
22s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
436 reactions across 57 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
372
85.3%
❤🔥
21
4.82%
💔
12
2.75%
😭
9
2.06%
👍
8
1.83%
🏆
4
0.917%
🥰
3
0.688%
👏
2
0.459%
🔥
2
0.459%
😍
2
0.459%
💯
1
0.229%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 59 of the 61 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 436reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 61 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎧 یه ویس دلی برای روزای سخت کنکور...
قرار نیست همیشه پرانرژی باشی. قرار نیست هر روز با حال خوب بیدار شی و بدون وقفه درس بخونی. 📚
سال کنکور، بالا و پایین داره... یه روز اوکی هستی، یه روز خستهای، یه روز شک میکنی. اینا طبیعیه. مهم اینه که وسط این نوسانها، خودتو گم نکنی. 🌿
انرژی واقعی یعنی اینکه حتی وقتی حال نداری، خیلی کم، ولی ادامه بدی. یعنی به جای صفر شدن، با یه قدم کوچیک برگردی به مسیر. 🚶♂️✨
ذهنیت مثبت هم یعن…
• سرعت درس خوندنت دو برابر کن • 😈
----
یکی از بهترین مهارت ها برای جلو افتادن از رقبای کنکوری، استفاده از تکنیک تندخوانی است.
مهمترین عامل در رسیدن به موفقیت ، کسب دانش بیشتر است🚫
بنابراین باید سرعت یادگیری خود را افزایش دهیم که موثرترین راه برای انجام این کار، بهبود سرعت خواندن، و یادگیری تکنیکهای تندخوانی است اگرچه این امر نیاز به تمرین و تکرار دارد، اما با توسعه این مهارت ها در خود می توانید از دیگران پیشی بگی…
چقدر خوندن رضایت هاتون به ما انرژی میده 😍💥
همه ی مشاورای مجموعه ما بی نظیر و کار بلدترینن🥹
اگه توام میخوای پیشرفت کنی و یکی تااخر مسیر همراهت باشه وقتشه که به پشتیبانی پیام بدی😌✔️
#رضایت #پیشرفت
مشاور ایشون خانم بهمن نیا
💟جهت رزرو مشاوره👇🏻
@poshtiban_drghanbari
💟عضويت كانال تلگرام👇🏻
@drghanbariii
🚫بدترینهایمطالعاتیکنکور🚫
----
1- بدترین ساعت مطالعه: ساعت مطالعه نوسانی (یک روز ده ساعت مطالعه و یک روز سه ساعت)⚔
2- بدترین محیط مطالعه: محیطی با دمای بالا نور کم و همراه با سر و صدا.💣
3- بدترین روش مطالعه: مطالعه وسواسی کتاب درسی و دیدن ویدئو های آموزشی بسیار💔
4- بدترین روش تست زنی: تست زدن بدون توجه به زمان و تحلیل نکردن!🚶🏻♀🫠
5- بدترین استراتژی کنکور: مطالعه بدون تست و مرور!😑
6- بدترین آفت کنکور: اعتیاد به…
📚 هنوزم خیلیا بزرگترین اشتباه کنکوریها رو تکرار میکنن...
کتاب درسی رو کنار میذارن و فکر میکنن فقط با جزوه و تست میشه موفق شد! 😵💫
اما حقیقت اینه که خیلی از سوالات امتحانات نهایی و حتی نکات مهم کنکور، دقیقاً از دل کتاب درسی بیرون میان...! 🎯
⁉️ کدوم درسها رو باید از روی کتاب خوند؟
⁉️ برای هر درس کتاب بهتره یا درسنامه؟
⁉️ برای نهاییها فقط کتاب کافیه یا باید منابع دیگه هم داشت؟
توی این پادکست همه این سوالها رو…
نظر دانش آموز عزیزمون دررابطه با مشاورشون و روندی که دارن🥹❤️
کنارتون هستیم تا لحظه ای که شمارو به هدفاتون برسونیم😌🤚
#رضایت #پیشرفت
مشاور ایشون خانم حیدری
💟جهت رزرو مشاوره👇🏻
@poshtiban_drghanbari
💟عضويت كانال تلگرام👇🏻
@drghanbariii
✍🏽کنکور توی ذهن شما ، خیلی بزرگتر از خود واقعیشه
موفقیت توی کنکور خیلی سخت به نظر میرسه
بخاطر همین ، فکر کردن به هدف ، فکر کردن به کنکور
باعث میشه که استرس توی وجودتون بیفته و هر روز بیشتر از دیروز نا امید بشین و به خودتون شک کنین
همین شک ، همین نا امیدی ، باعث میشه که روز به روز درس خوندن سخت تر و بی کیفیت تر بشه
---
من خودم وقتی نا امید میشدم ، به خودم میگفتم بخون و به چیزی کاری نداشته باش
توی پرانتز بگم " …
😮💨 خستگی همیشه به معنی «باید توقف کنی» نیست...
گاهی فقط یعنی ذهنت تحت فشاره، نه اینکه توانت تموم شده. ⚡️
خیلی از کنکوریها دقیقاً همینجا جا میزنن؛ وسط مسیر، وقتی هنوز راه زیادی مونده. 📚
توی این پادکست یاد میگیری:
🧠 فرق خستگی واقعی با خستگی ذهنی چیه.
⏳ چطور سریع ریکاوری کنی و برگردی به مطالعه.
🔥 و چطور بدون فرسوده شدن، ادامه بدی.
یادت باشه...
موفقها همیشه پرانرژی نیستن؛ فقط یاد گرفتن چطور با خستگی ادامه بدن. …
اگر این روزا به خاطر کنکور استرس دارم، چجوری مدیریتش کنم؟ 📚
اگه از من که رتبه برتر بودم بپرسی، میگم استرس کنکور یه چیز طبیعیه؛ مهم اینه نذاری کنترل کار دست اون باشه.
چند تا کاری که خودم انجام میدادم:
1️⃣ به جای فکر کردن به نتیجه، روی امروز تمرکز میکردم🎯
هر وقت ذهنم میرفت سمت اگه قبول نشم چی؟، به خودم میگفتم: الان فقط باید همین چند ساعت رو خوب پیش ببرم.
2️⃣ برنامهام رو واقعی میچیدم📑
قرار نیست یه شبه ۱۲ ساعت درس …
😭 «خانوم دکتر... همه میگن نمیشه!»
هرچی میخونی یه نفر پیدا میشه که ناامیدت کنه...
یکی میگه دیر شروع کردی! 😐
یکی میگه رقابت خیلی سنگینه! 😶
یکی میگه تو از پسش برنمیای! 😔
و کمکم این حرفها از صدای بقیه تبدیل میشه به صدای ذهن خودت...💔
اما یه سوال مهم:
❓اگر واقعا نمیشه، پس اونایی که موفق شدن چطور موفق شدن؟
توی این ویس درباره یکی از بزرگترین دشمنهای موفقیت حرف زدم:
⚠️ تاثیر حرفهای منفی دیگران روی ذهن و عملکردمون
ی…
ذهن فرد کمالگرا اینطوری کار میکنه:
اول بدون رفرنس و هیچ دلیل منطقی
یک فکت یا یک اجبار میسازه
«من میخوام برم آمریکا»
من میخوام رتبه یک بشم»
«برای پیاده روی، حتما کتونی نایکی لازمه»
در مرحله دوم؛ چون نقاط و
فکتی که ساخته هم مبهم هست، هم از توانایی و محدودیتها( روانی، اقتصادی و ...) فرد، خارج هست، از انجام دادن ناتوان میشه.
در مرحله سوم، پایبندی احمقانه و تعصبات بدون دلیل و ارجاع، شروع میشه، و یک مسلک یا قاعده فک…
👍6❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 61 posts we hold for @drghanbariii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
دکتر سهرابی مفرد|رتبه ۴کنکور @dr_sohrabimofrad_4 · 215,520 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
کنکور دانشگاه فرهنگیان @Resane_Farhangian · 183,482 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آكادمی آموزشی-مشاورهای دكتر قنبری” (@drghanbariii), 104,862 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drghanbariii.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.