Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Три грани Нины | книги, мифы и любовь

Channel

Три грани Нины | книги, мифы и любовь

@knigoman_milton

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

936subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001150020873
TypeChannel
Username@knigoman_milton
Created5 February 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/knigoman_milton

Growth

936937936.56 August 2026 — 937 subscribers6 August 2026 — 937 subscribers13 August 2026 — 936 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 936–937 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 18:14936-1
6 Aug 2026, 13:52937no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:58937first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.5%
avg views ÷ 936 subscribers
Avg views / post
117
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
23.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held9 (29 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total1,051
Reactions total248
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 13:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

248 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9739.1%
custom 53395440243174461418032.3%
🔥5020.2%
😁208.06%
💔10.403%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 248reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 17:08 UTC85 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Нина, я тоже хотела вас поблагодарить! У меня столько тетрадных листов исписано после лекций 🙈 Вы очень здорово соединяете теорию и примеры. Отдельное спасибо за тренировочную историю про море. Я сначала думала, что буду со своим текстом работать, но поняла, что на чужом мне и легче, и полезнее. Очень надеюсь, что смогу улучшить и свою историю после курса.

11custom 53395440243174461416🔥4

5 Aug 2026, 16:58 UTC88 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Нина, спасибо вам за курс 🌿 Прошло всего два занятия, но уже столько интересного для себя отметила. Очень нравится, как вы подаёте материал, задания тоже захватывют. На днях просидела несколько часов над рабочей тетрадью, придумывая детали мира, как же это одновременно непросто и увлекательно... 🥲 Жду с нетерпением следующих лекций 😌

custom 533954402431744614186🔥4

5 Aug 2026, 16:58 UTC82 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Я уже говорила, как люблю свою работу? Нет? Ну тогда слушайте)) Я в восторге и счастлива, особенно когда вижу, что есть результат и то, что вдохновляет меня, отзывается и у других🥰

custom 5339544024317446141115🔥4

5 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC94 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Место, где мои ноги взбунтовались, а душа воспарила. После обзорной экскурсии по городу мы приехали к Каскаду — месту, поднявшись на вершину которого, я увидела Арарат во всей красе. Поднимались мы по эскалаторам, но спускались пешком (жаль, не посчитала количество ступеней). Строительство Каскада начали в 1980 году. Задумка была грандиозная: огромная лестница-монумент, которая соединит центр Еревана с жилым районо

custom 5339544024317446141135🔥4

5 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC97 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Уже два занятия позади — и я, кажется, давно не чувствовала такого азарта от собственной работы. Мы прошли путь от «скелета» культурного контекста как системы — откуда он берётся, из чего состоит, как влияет на сюжет — до символов, архетипов и культурных аллюзий, которые помогают говорить не в лоб, а через образ. Уже сейчас видно и по вопросам, и по работе на занятиях, и по домашним заданиям: студенты не просто слуш

15🔥6custom 53395440243174461415

3 Aug 2026, 10:38 UTC119 views29 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @bdaydreamerrrPhoto

У нас своя ежедневная Одиссея 😂😂😂

😁20🔥53💔1

1 Aug 2026, 05:33 UTC164 views44 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Давайте, что ли, подведем какие-то итоги июля, в основном рабочие. Личными поделюсь чуть позже, когда появится однозначность и решатся главные вопросы. Итак 🤩Вышел третий выпуск подкаста «Право править» с Александром Пауланом 🤩Завершила курс «Между мирами». Проверила ~6 алок и провела 6 индивидуальных консультаций. 🤩Запустили мой авторский курс «Культурный контекст» 🤩Сдала 4 рукописи (до сих пор не верю, что выв

21custom 533954402431744614114🔥9

31 Jul 2026, 06:08 UTC159 views46 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🌟🌟🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🌟🌟 🤩🤩🤩🤩 Наверное, мне стоит дать какие-то внятные пояснения редким появлениям на канале у себя и у других, долгим ответам в личке и вообще некой отстраненности. Последние полтора месяца настойчиво проверяют меня на прочность, подбрасывая одновременно долгожданные события, поездки вперемешку с нерешаемыми вопросами. И все это на фоне плотного рабочего графика, в котором сошлись (странно, никогда

20custom 533954402431744614116🔥10

29 Jul 2026, 15:04 UTC163 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Есть музеи, в которые приходишь на час и выходишь через три. Музей истории Армении на площади Республики именно такой. Он занимает одно из главных зданий на площади и внутри хранит всё — от урартских бронзовых поясов до средневековых ювелирных украшений, от древних наскальных рисунков до монет, рукописей и артефактов, которые складываются в непрерывную историю длиной в несколько тысячелетий. Мне чертовски повезло у

11custom 53395440243174461417🔥4

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @knigoman_milton. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 322,201 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Три грани Нины | книги, мифы и любовь” (@knigoman_milton), 936 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/knigoman_milton.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.