Channel
@knifewifee
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
38subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002182270225 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @knifewifee |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 29 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/knifewifee |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 10:19 | 38 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:47 | 38 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 29 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
206 reactions across 13 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5292065432897858168 | 46 | 22.3% | |
| custom 5219790650953719291 | 42 | 20.4% | |
| 🔥 | 32 | 15.5% | |
| ❤ | 27 | 13.1% | |
| 🎃 | 15 | 7.28% | |
| ❤🔥 | 11 | 5.34% | |
| 💔 | 9 | 4.37% | |
| 👻 | 8 | 3.88% | |
| 💘 | 5 | 2.43% | |
| 🕊 | 4 | 1.94% | |
| 💋 | 3 | 1.46% | |
| 🆒 | 2 | 0.971% | |
| 🍾 | 2 | 0.971% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 206reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 29 September 2024 to 20 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @knifewifee. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 September 2024 to 20 January 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
#𝒔𝒂𝒏𝒌𝒕𝒂𝒔𝒂𝒕𝒂𝒏 для банды: полная перезагрузка коннектов. если хотите остаться, отметьтесь под постом, также принимаю новых! (без повторов) фд: только гришаверс, не забудьте написать имя на английском, для ожп/омп: ещё имя каста.💋 для моих паучков: как ваши дела родные, что нового, рассказывайте, скучали?)
❤7
Photo, posted without a caption
❤5
#ʍᴏdᴇrniᴛᴇᴛ ﮩـﮩﮩ٨ـﮩ٨ـﮩﮩ٨ـﮩـﮩﮩ٨ـﮩ٨ـﮩﮩ٨ـﮩ٨ـﮩﮩ٨ـ Х϶дᴋᴀнᴏны нᴀ дᴩужбу ᴄ Инᴇж ʙ ᴄᴏʙᴩᴇʍᴇннᴏй AU ▦ Инᴇж и Нинᴀ ᴨᴏɜнᴀᴋᴏʍиᴧиᴄь ʙ бᴏᴧьницᴇ, ᴋᴏᴦдᴀ ᴨᴇᴩʙᴀя ᴨᴏᴨᴀᴧᴀ ᴛудᴀ ᴄ ᴨᴇᴩᴇᴧᴏʍᴏʍ ᴨᴏᴄᴧᴇ ɜᴀдᴀния ʙ ᴨᴏᴧиции, ᴀ ʙᴛᴏᴩᴀя ᴨᴩᴏхᴏдиᴧᴀ ᴨᴩᴀᴋᴛиᴋу ᴏᴛ ʍᴇдицинᴄᴋᴏᴦᴏ униʙᴇᴩᴄиᴛᴇᴛᴀ. ▦ Οбᴇ дᴇʙуɯᴋи нᴇ ᴩᴀбᴏᴛᴀюᴛ ᴨᴏ ᴨᴩᴏɸᴇᴄᴄии — Ɜᴇниᴋ ᴏᴛᴋᴩыᴧᴀ ᴄʙᴏю ᴨᴇᴋᴀᴩню, ᴀ Γᴀɸᴀ ᴄᴛᴀᴧᴀ инᴄᴛᴩуᴋᴛᴏᴩᴏʍ ᴨᴏ ᴩᴏуᴨджᴀʍᴨинᴦу. Нинᴀ ниᴋᴏᴦдᴀ нᴇ ᴦᴏᴩᴇᴧᴀ жᴇᴧᴀниᴇʍ ᴨᴩыᴦнуᴛь ᴏᴛᴋудᴀ-нибуд…
❤6🔥3💋2
ㅤ🎃 ㅤ🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 in 👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆 🤩 headcanon данный пост не повествует о каноне вселенной, он отражает лишь мысли автора, его видение. Хэллоуин во вселенной Гришаверс носил бы одно основное чудесное имя — День Святых. Считалось, что именно в этот день Святые могут спуститься как никогда близко к миру смертников. С большей вероятностью услышат ваши молитвы, но также и кара за всё содеянное настигнет вас в большей мере,…
🎃15custom 529206543289785816810👻6custom 52197906509537192915❤🔥2💔2🕊2❤1
ㅤㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ #𝒔𝒐𝒖𝒍𝒎𝒆𝒍𝒐𝒅𝒚 🌟 ㅤ🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋🐋 ㅤㅤㅤ ㅤ Надо мною — тишина, ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ Небо полное дождя, ㅤㅤㅤДождь проходит сквозь меня, ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ Но боли больше нет. ㅤㅤ ㅤ Под холодный шепот звезд ㅤ ㅤ ㅤМы сожгли последний мост, ㅤㅤㅤㅤИ все в бездну сорвалось. ㅤㅤㅤㅤ ㅤСвободным стану я ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤОт зла и от добра, ㅤㅤМоя душа была на лезвии ножа. 🤩 ㅤㅤㅤㅤЯ бы мог с тобою быть, ㅤㅤ ㅤ Я бы мог про все забыть, ㅤㅤㅤㅤ …
custom 52197906509537192919custom 52920654328978581685❤🔥4❤2👻2🔥2🕊2💔1
🤩☺️😎☺️😘🧐😂🧐👍😂 сейчас постов особо много не будет, тем более сюжетных. у меня нехилое такое выгорание, в основном ко всем людям, которые дышат и тд. ну и учёба, куда без неё). вы у меня чудесные-замечательные, поэтому, думаю, понимаете и будете меня ждать. периодически будут выходить какие-то хэдканоны и прочее, а то их вообще здесь почти не было.. но мы это исправим. если хотите поболтать, то всегда вас жду у себя😋 не…
🔥6
#𝒊𝒏𝒇𝒐 доброго денька, воронята мои! соскучились? я уж надеюсь. итак, к делу. вы довольно много спрашивали у меня в анонке когда же продолжение🌟 оно уже есть! если кто не читал у корсара, кратко перескажу: «Волк Волн» отчалил в Равку, оставив там Джеспера с Уайленом, и подобрав на борт несколько новых компаньонов (в лице Жени и Мейфии), после чего наконец доплыл до границ Фьерды. Нина с Маттиасом сошли с корабля на л…
🔥7custom 52920654328978581687❤2
🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩 Вы, именно Вы! можете помочь поднять общий вид и оформление канала своим прекрасным голосом на новый уровень. Голосуй за матриархат! В свою очередь постараюсь приложить как можно больше усилий для того, чтобы радовать ваш взгляд при каждом визите сюда. Ну и конечно постараюсь отмолить вас пред Святыми🤩 ㅤㅤㅤㅤ🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 ㅤㅤㅤ𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐛𝐞𝐚𝐮𝐭𝐲 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐂𝐫𝐨𝐰'𝐬 𝐐𝐮𝐞𝐞𝐧! ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ*𝐛𝐞𝐠 𝐒𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐦𝐞𝐫𝐜𝐲*
custom 52197906509537192917custom 52920654328978581685❤🔥3❤2💘1
ПОЗДРАВЛЯЮ МОЮ ЛЮБИМУЮ ДОРОГУЮ ЗОЕЧКУ!🌟🌟 С днём рождения, Ваше Величество!! Теперь Равка явно в надёжных, крепких и прекрасных руках🌟 Мы ждём пооооост😭😭😭
custom 52197906509537192914custom 52920654328978581683❤🔥2🔥2
#𝒔𝒂𝒏𝒌𝒕𝒂𝒔𝒂𝒕𝒂𝒏 4 месяца🤭 и куда-то отписочки сегодня пошли..ну да и ладно. люблю вас всех очень🫦
custom 52197906509537192917custom 52920654328978581683
#𝒊𝒏𝒇𝒐 #𝒔𝒂𝒏𝒌𝒕𝒂𝒔𝒂𝒕𝒂𝒏 Буквально чуть не забыла, простите, Святые, грешную!! Вчера было ровно 9 лет с выхода первой части шикарной дилогии поистине волшебного и так любимого всеми нами книжного цикла "Гришаверс" — "Шестёрка Воронов"!!! Поздравляю всех сожителей фандома🤩🤩🤩
🔥8custom 52920654328978581686❤2🍾2💘1
😳 😋😂🥲 😊😎❓ 💜 подписка только по желанию! 💜 каналы 15+. 💜 держу шб на канале час, чтобы не засорять пиаром:) 💜 ваш шб должен быть на публичном канале, кидайте ссылку на него, всех обнимаю! @inejikBot
custom 52920654328978581684💘1
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @knifewifee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 783,958 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@knifewifee named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝑺𝑯𝑨𝑫𝑶𝑾𝒀 𝑴𝑬𝑹𝑪𝒀.🕷” (@knifewifee), 38 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/knifewifee.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.