Channel
@lucifexysarchive
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 29 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002136869550 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lucifexysarchive |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 29 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lucifexysarchive |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 1 | no change |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:00 | 1 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 21 June 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 June 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Новое анонимное сообщение! Кстати, да. Мне не хватает вопросов и ответов касательно пророка. По началу было забавно наблюдать за анонимными и другими сообщениями людей, но все же тема уже теряет свои краски и пора бы ее закрыть (хотя бы снизить, количество одного и того же)? Разнобразие нужно. Нахожу «#SLIVKI» лучшим каналом, по подобной тематике. Каждую статью читаю с упоением. — Левый человек. 🍑 — Вот такой дол…
🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 𝐋𝐨𝐯𝐞 𝐢𝐬... 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐝𝐚𝐫𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬 𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐞 𝐥𝐢𝐤𝐞 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐬. p.s: кого тут нет, прошу без обид. 🤩🤩
Раскусили!
У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! И это всё один Серёжа? Ахаха ↩️ Свайпни для ответа.
Тогда пусть будет так: 1. Разумовский 2. Люцифер 3. Карен Смит
У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Топ 3 самых красивых для вас авторов дневников которых вы видели ↩️ Свайпни для ответа.
я уверена, он прелесть.
#𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐨𝐫 Вы нарушаете его границы, дайте Серёге подышать, ребят ;)
День добрый, мы знакомы не более двух лет, а так чтобы точно вспомнить... Не смогу ;) Больше года, но не больше двух. Мы из разных стран, пока не виделись, но однажды это исправим. Сейчас довольствуемся видеосвязью и голосовыми. Если кому-то интересно, то в жизни он тоже рыжий.
У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! как давно вы знакомы с сергеем разумовским?? вы виделись в рж? ↩️ Свайпни для ответа.
признаться что я прочитала все его статьи и теперь в лужу
его
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @lucifexysarchive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐀𝐑𝐂𝐇𝐈𝐕𝐄” (@lucifexysarchive), 1 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lucifexysarchive.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.