Channel
@kmu_iki
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
139subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003464851155 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kmu_iki |
| Description | XXIII Конференция молодых учёных по космическим исследованиям (КМУ 2026) в Институте космических исследований РАН (ИКИ). kmu.cosmos.ru XXIII International Conference for Young Scientists on Space Research (YSC 2026). |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kmu_iki |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 139 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:41 | 139 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
118 reactions across 14 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 48 | 40.7% | |
| ❤ | 46 | 39.0% | |
| 🍾 | 8 | 6.78% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 2.54% | |
| 🤪 | 3 | 2.54% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 1.69% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 1.69% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 1.69% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 1.69% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.847% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 0.847% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 118reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 April 2026 to 26 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Полезны или вредны ИИ-агенты (ChatGPT и аналоги) для научной деятельности?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
В первый день КМУ 2026 мы провели дебаты и дискуссию о значении сервисов на основе генеративного ИИ (ChatGPT и аналоги) для научной деятельности. Оппоненты заняли следующие позиции: ИИ-агенты полезны для научной деятельности и должны применяться при проведении научных исследований. Бессмысленно отрицать, что генеративный ИИ меняет наш мир. Чтобы эти изменения шли на пользу науке, современный исследователь обязан как…
❤4
КМУ ИКИ РАН 🚀 pinned «Подходит к концу КМУ 2026 — почти все доклады рассказаны, вопросы отвечены, коктейли выпиты, спеты почти все песни под гитару. Несколько минут вашего внимания помогут нам сделать КМУ лучше. Пожалуйста, пройдите короткий опрос. Если у вас остались вопросы…»
Подходит к концу КМУ 2026 — почти все доклады рассказаны, вопросы отвечены, коктейли выпиты, спеты почти все песни под гитару. Несколько минут вашего внимания помогут нам сделать КМУ лучше. Пожалуйста, пройдите короткий опрос. Если у вас остались вопросы о конференции, их можно задать в комментариях к этому посту. Желаем ярких открытий, и в науке и в жизни. До встречи! 🚀
❤12
В 13:30, в Конференц-зале, старший научный сотрудник Института проблем экологии и эволюции имени А. Н. Северцова РАН, к.б.н. Неретина Анна Николаевна выступит с пленарным докладом «Охота на невидимок: наука и искусство». 🔘Как ученые «охотятся» за обитателями микромира на Земле и в космосе ? 🔘Какие приемы придумали ученые для работы с крошечными объектами? 🔘Какие обитатели микромира живут рядом с нами, на нас и даже …
🔥3❤2🥰2
Друзья! В 19:00 ждём вас на фуршет в Выставочном зале ИКИ (первый этаж, вход со стороны А4)! В этом году мы решили приготовить для вас сюрприз — подробности в комментариях к этому посту. 🍸
🍾8🔥3🤪3😭3⚡2🍓1
В четверг, 23 апреля, директор Департамента туристических и специальных проектов Исполнительной дирекции РГО Чайкова Анжелика Игоревна выступит с пленарным докладом «Ключевые направления деятельности Русского географического общества». 🔘Чем живёт РГО сегодня? 🔘Как попасть в экспедицию РГО? 🔘Чем научное сообщество может быть полезно РГО, а РГО - научному сообществу? 📺 Трансляция доклада на VK Видео ▶️ Трансляция док…
🔥3🕊2❤1
Второй день XXIII Международной конференции молодых учёных по космическим исследованиям. 🚀 Сегодня в трансляции: 9:30–18:00 — секция «Космическое приборостроение и эксперимент» 9:30–18:15 — секция «Теория и моделирование физических процессов» 9:30–11:30 — секция «Дистанционное зондирование Земли» 12:00–18:30 — секция «Космос в социальных науках и мировой политике» ✨️ Не пропустите: 13:30 — пленарный доклад «Ключевы…
🔥2
В 18:30 в аудитории 202 начнутся дебаты и открытая дискуссия «ChatGPT, построй график» — научная деятельность в эпоху ИИ-агентов и чат-ботов. Модератор: Евгений Фролов, сотрудник Государственного университета «Дубна», старший преподаватель кафедры клинической психологии Участники дебатов: — Андрей Мухин, сотрудник отдела Астрофизики высоких энергий ИКИ РАН, аспирант МФТИ — Бельведерский Михаил, редактор Телеграм-…
🔥6
В 13:30 в Конференц-зале состоится пленарный доклад сотрудника ИКИ РАН Евгения Захарова Темная Вселенная. История двух главных загадок современной физики. Вопросы к докладчику можно задавать лично в зале, либо в комментариях под этим постом 🔽
❤7
В ИКИ РАН начинается XXIII Международная конференция молодых учёных по космическим исследованиям! 🛰 Сегодня в трансляции: 9:30–18:00 — секция «Дистанционное зондирование Земли» 9:30–17:45 — секция «Астрофизика и радиоастрономия» 9:30–16:30 — секция «Юниоры (9–11 классы)» 10:00–18:00 — секция «Исследование планет» ✨ Не пропустите: 11:20 — открытие конференции 13:30 — пленарный доклад «Тёмная Вселенная. История двух …
Друзья, в этом году мы подготовили для вас стикеры, которыми можно кастомизировать свой беджик! Выбирайте наклейки, которые лучше всего передают сферу ваших интересов. Напоминаем, что вход в институт происходит через подъезд А4.
❤9🔥5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kmu_iki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Полезны или вредны ИИ-агенты (ChatGPT и аналоги) для научной деятельности?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
К применению ИИ-агентов и чат-ботов в научной деятельности я отношусь
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
В своей научной работе я использую ИИ-агентов и чат-ботов для
The shares total 215%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 April 2026 to 26 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 401,156 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“КМУ ИКИ РАН 🚀” (@kmu_iki), 139 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kmu_iki.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.