Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Kiwi Voice

@kiwivoice

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

78subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001468839457
TypeChannel
Username@kiwivoice
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kiwivoice

Growth

7880797 August 2026 — 80 subscribers9 August 2026 — 80 subscribers15 August 2026 — 78 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 78–80 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 06:5278-2
9 Aug 2026, 19:0180no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:1380first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 April 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 May 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
22m 04s
Average length
3m 41s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥150.0%
😁150.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 April 2022 to 27 May 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 May 2022, 16:06 UTC611 viewsread 9 August 2026

https://m.theepochtimes.com/the-surprising-cause-of-melanoma-and-no-its-not-too-much-sun_1726259.html?utm_source=healthtop5noe&utm_campaign=htop5-2022-05-27&utm_medium=email&est=6ERkSjKE3C%2FV3IbLIzpKI1wQL0bJv%2F9LjltBBtnvBDzBAeGX%2Bf6fJOAQpXrJ7aHIj7E%3D

23 May 2022, 16:49 UTC552 viewsread 9 August 2026

https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/is-it-monkeypox-or-crystalpox?r=ovc7p&s=r&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email&utm_source=direct

22 May 2022, 05:28 UTC320 viewsread 9 August 2026

https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/monkey-pox?r=ovc7p&s=r&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email&utm_source=direct

20 May 2022, 17:41 UTC209 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @chiefnerdPhoto

In March 2021, NTI partnered with the Munich Security Conference to simulate the release of a lab engineered Monkeypox virus “The exercise scenario portrayed a deadly, global pandemic involving an unusual strain of monkeypox virus that emerged in the fictional nation of Brinia and spread globally over 18 months. Ultimately, the exercise scenario revealed that the initial outbreak was caused by a terrorist attack usi

20 May 2022, 17:37 UTC149 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @goddekPhoto

Who could've predicted the monkey pox outbreak?! Oh, hang on... The attached #monkeypox scenario was run last year. Looking at the dates, it is a plan as far as I am concerned. Link to document: https://www.nti.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/NTI_Paper_BIO-TTX_Final.pdf 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 @Goddek | Minds | Bastyon | Gettr

30 Apr 2022, 16:03 UTC197 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @ungathegreatVideo

The Pfizer Report Raises More Questions Than It Answers, Redacts Important Parts “It's a shocker of the 42,086 patients… twelve-hundred and twenty-three of them died. Death was the outcome. That's 3.7% of the total… if we knew how many doses were shipped by Pfizer, we would understand what level of death this represents… but Pfizer redacted that number of how many total doses they shipped. So we cannot know what lev

30 Apr 2022, 15:47 UTC148 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @VigilantFoxVideo

"Not Counted" as Vaccine Deaths - Over 50,000 Americans Aged 65 and Up Died Within the First Two Weeks Attorney Thomas Renz: "They say, 'Well, we don't count anyone as vaccinated until 14 days after their full vaccination,' so that means until 14 days after your second dose, it's not counted. Well, they did that because they know most reactions occur within 14 days of either your first or second dose... [As of] Nove

25 Apr 2022, 19:34 UTC158 viewsread 9 August 2026

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/elon-musk-has-an-agreement-to-acquire-twitter-for-66b/AB6RUBOR7JYE7MAUFACKZNVKUA/

25 Apr 2022, 09:59 UTC150 viewsread 9 August 2026

https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/kitten-corner-cancer-screening?r=ovc7p&s=r&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email&utm_source=direct

21 Apr 2022, 08:39 UTC173 viewsread 9 August 2026

A clear example of how pre vaccine a country had managed the outbreak with the use of HCQ. Once vaccines were introduced the cases and deaths explode… https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/thailands-tale-of-covid-19-medicine?r=ovc7p&s=r&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email&utm_source=direct

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kiwivoice. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,323,525 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Kiwi Voice” (@kiwivoice), 78 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kiwivoice.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.