Morning, rindu aku ke ?
๐47๐ฅ24โค13๐7๐3๐ป3๐3๐2

Channel
@Sup3rScalping
On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Posts edited after publishing ยท Polls ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry
25,198subscribers
-1,065 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 10,000โ31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001854511203 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Sup3rScalping |
| Description | Magic Candle - Entry Macam Scalper, TP Macam Sniper. |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Sup3rScalping |
Crypto & trading โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 23:01 | 25,198 | -131 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 02:38 | 25,329 | -60 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 19:01 | 25,389 | -60 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 19:41 | 25,449 | +2 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 06:00 | 25,447 | -7 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 11:40 | 25,454 | -79 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 17:20 | 25,533 | -73 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 09:20 | 25,606 | -55 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 13:17 | 25,661 | -44 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:34 | 25,705 | -38 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:15 | 25,743 | -38 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:44 | 25,781 | -12 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:07 | 25,793 | -12 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:43 | 25,805 | -27 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:22 | 25,832 | -18 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:23 | 25,850 | -9 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:24 | 25,859 | -7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:53 | 25,866 | -22 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 14:07 | 25,888 | -33 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 00:36 | 25,921 | first reading |
103 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 14 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 103 (5 August 2026 โ 14 September 2026) |
| Views total | 87,305 |
| Reactions total | 1,185 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Sept 2026, 04:57 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 30 September 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
3,941 reactions across 103 posts, in 49 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ๐ฅ | 1,680 | 42.6% | |
| โค | 801 | 20.3% | |
| ๐ | 516 | 13.1% | |
| ๐ณ | 154 | 3.91% | |
| ๐ | 106 | 2.69% | |
| ๐ | 61 | 1.55% | |
| ๐ฅฐ | 45 | 1.14% | |
| ๐ | 29 | 0.736% | |
| ๐ | 28 | 0.71% | |
| ๐คช | 28 | 0.71% | |
| ๐ฆ | 25 | 0.634% | |
| โคโ๐ฅ | 23 | 0.584% | |
| ๐คจ | 23 | 0.584% | |
| ๐ | 22 | 0.558% | |
| ๐ | 21 | 0.533% | |
| ๐ | 19 | 0.482% | |
| ๐ฅด | 19 | 0.482% | |
| ๐ฏ | 18 | 0.457% | |
| ๐ | 18 | 0.457% | |
| ๐ป | 17 | 0.431% | |
| 29 further kinds | 288 | 7.31% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 103 of the 103 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 3,941 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 103 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 14 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ bought with money โ on a post by @Sup3rScalping. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 103 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 14 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Morning, rindu aku ke ?
๐47๐ฅ24โค13๐7๐3๐ป3๐3๐2
Aku dah cakap turun kan tadi punya setup ada spike biasalah ๐คช๐คช๐คช COLLECT 80 PIPS โ โ โ
๐ฅ21โค9๐7โคโ๐ฅ3๐3๐2๐1๐1
Aku Tekan Sell Sekarang ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฅ SL : 4435 Gentle full margin turun jauh ni
๐ฅ9๐3๐ฅด2๐ซก2๐2๐ญ1๐ค1๐คจ1
STANBY RECOVERY โ โ โ
๐10โค3๐2๐จโ๐ป2๐ฅฐ2๐ฅด2๐1๐ป1
Oh man gold kena kan kita, sabar jap ๐ซต
๐4๐3๐2โ1๐ค1๐ฅฐ1๐1
Jom tekan sell gold now โ SL : 4310 Double Top Jadi Kena Double Lot !
๐ฅ11โค4๐2๐ฏ2๐ฅด2๐1๐1๐จโ๐ป1
Dah Lama Tak Layan Setup ๐ซต JOM READY WOIII โ โ โ
โค19๐ฅ13๐3โคโ๐ฅ1๐ญ1๐1๐ฅด1
Test test dah ramai player ke?
๐ฅ49โค15๐2๐ญ1๐ค1๐ฅด1๐1
Tido Je Lah Tap Pun Tak Sampai ๐คฃ
๐15๐ฅ11โค2๐2๐ฅด2๐คจ1๐คช1๐ซก1
Harini semua get ready dalam Super Scalping! โ๐ป๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฅ Bagi aku 100x api tanda sedia buat duit dengan aku! โ๐ป ๐ฅ๐ฅ
๐ฅ99โค9๐6โคโ๐ฅ1๐1๐1๐ป1๐ฏ1
Goodmorning everyone!
๐ฅ41โค7๐2๐2๐ฏ2โ1๐1
M1 Camtu Pun Dah Kaw Kaw Mahal, Tapi Betullah Tekaan Aku ๐ซต๐ NFP NEWS 100 PIPS โ โ โ SETUP GAGAL ๐ฅฒ๐ฅฒ๐ฅฒ๐ฅฒ๐ฅฒ COLLECT 400 PIPS โ โ โ Dah Janji Counter Betul ? Tengok Sendiri Dapat Takโฆ. Jumpa esok ๐ค
โค18๐ฅ9๐2๐1๐ณ1๐ฆ1๐1๐1
Showing the 12 most recent of 103 posts we hold for @Sup3rScalping. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@Sup3rScalping edited 4 posts after it first published โ the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too โ this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollโs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
GOLD NAK KEMANA ???
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only โ there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionโs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 103 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 14 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Telegramโs own answer, not this registerโs. When this register asks Telegramโs API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it โ never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegramโs; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegramโs recommendation API, most recently 14 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register โ how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 64 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegramโs list for THAT channel, not this one โ see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โSuper Scalping ๐ฎ๐ฉโ (@Sup3rScalping), 25,198 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Sup3rScalping.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.