Channel name was changed to «김딸깍»

Channel
김딸깍
@kimclickNFT
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,012subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001671427021 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kimclickNFT |
| Created | 16 April 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kimclickNFT |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:04 | 1,012 | -3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 02:38 | 1,015 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:20 | 1,018 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:46 | 1,017 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 26 April 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
89 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 67 | 75.3% | |
| ❤ | 15 | 16.9% | |
| 😢 | 6 | 6.74% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 1.12% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 89reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 26 April 2024 to 1 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
스스로 항상 크립토를 접자고 말하던 시기가 드디어 찾아온 것 같습니다. 사실, 이 글을 쓸 만큼 저에게 관심이 없으실 것 같지만, 그래도 지금까지 운영한 시간이 있으니 글을 남기는 것이 예의라 생각하여 글을 남깁니다. 자극적인 수익에 집중하는 동안, 무언가를 만들고 새로운 것을 시도해야하는 제 직업과의 우선순위가 매번 뒤바뀌었던 거 같아요. 한때는 밤낮 없이 NFT 가격 모니터링을 하고 선물 거래를 하며 기분이 오르락내리락하기도 하고, 밈코인 거래로 큰 돈을 벌기도 러그풀을 당기도하며 결국은 소탐대실의 순간이 많았고, 그 과정에서 제 재능 역시 부족했음을 깨달았습니다. 이제는 미뤄왔던 현생의 일에 더욱 집중을 하려합니다. 그동안 댓글도 많이 달아주시고 소통해주신 모든 분들께 진심으로 감사드려요! 채널 운영을 통해 많은 것을 배우고 좋…
👍63❤10😢6
Signed jin
Channel photo updated
zk 에드 대상 리스트 csv 파일 다운로드 받아서 확인 가능합니다. 혹시나 api 오류일까 파일에서 다시 찾아봤지만 최종 0개 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ https://github.com/ZKsync-Association/zknation-data/blob/main/eligibility_list.csv
Signed jin
🪙 zkSYNC 블로그 내용 살짝 수정됨 아까는 다음주였는데 지금보면 이번주로 바뀜 https://blog.zknation.io/introducing-zk-nation/
Signed jin
$Pizza
Signed jin
🟧Builders in Bitcoin Ecosystem: Seoul Edition 🟧 Seouldinals가 오픈 한 달여 만에 글로벌 비트코인 빌더인 CKB(Nervos), Solv Protocol, Unisat, and Followin을 소개하는 밋업을 개최합니다 📌 행사 소개 Builders in Bitcoin Ecosystem은 글로벌 비트코인 빌더를 국내 커뮤니티에 소개하는 커뮤니티 주도형 밋업입니다. 국내에서 비트코인 빌더를 만날 기회가 많지 않은 상황에서 이번 행사를 통해 비트코인 인프라와 솔루션이 현재 시장을 어떻게 바라보는지에 대한 이해를 높이고 빌더, 개발자와의 네트워킹 형성을 목표로 합니다. 🗓️ 일정 : 5/30(목) ⏰ 시간 : 18:00 - 21:00 🗺️ 장소 : Hashed Lounge(미림타워 3층…
👍2
Signed jin
딥페이크를 통한 해킹 사례가 많다고 합니다. 우선 케이틀린 제너의 X와 인스타그램에 게시글은 확인이 되었는데 유의하시길 바랍니다 https://cointelegraph.com/news/wave-crypto-influencers-celebrity-x-accounts-caitlyn-jenner-hacked
Signed jin
$jenner $0.009 -> $0.036 털고나니 더 잘가네요 구매하신 분들은 수익 축하드립니다!
😱1
Signed jin
x2🚀
Signed jin
글쓴 시점으로 30-40%는 올랐네요. 스샷 고점 조심
Signed jin
CA 4GJ3TCt5mTgQT5BRKb14AkjddpFQqKVfphxzS3t4foZ9 도람뿌 묻은 육상선수 출신 사업가가 낸 밈코입니다. 뜨겁네여 DYOR PUMPING🐼
❤3👍1
Signed jin
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @kimclickNFT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@kimclickNFT named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“김딸깍” (@kimclickNFT), 1,012 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kimclickNFT.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.