Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

خواطر الطالب

@khavatir

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

678subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001985504419
TypeChannel
Username@khavatir
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/khavatir

Growth

677678677.57 Aug 2026, 12:24 — 677 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 02:32 — 677 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 12:38 — 678 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 12:248 Aug 2026, 12:38
3 measurements spanning 1 day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 677–678 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 12:38678+1
8 Aug 2026, 02:32677no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:24677first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 29s
Average length
1m 29s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

157 reactions across 20 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7044.6%
👍3119.7%
🔥2817.8%
💔127.64%
👌31.91%
😢31.91%
😭31.91%
💘21.27%
😨21.27%
👏10.637%
😍10.637%
🤔10.637%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 157reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 February 2026 to 2 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @khavatir. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 February 2026 to 2 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Jun 2026, 16:38 UTC318 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📜 Можно ли говорить «Садакаллахуль Азым» после чтения Корана? Действительно, некоторые считают это нововведением, но давайте разберемся, что говорят учёные Ислама! «✅ Желательно произносить после завершения чтения Благородного Корана одно из следующих выражений: (СУБХАНАКАЛЛАХУММА ВА БИХАМДИК, АШХАДУ АН ЛЯ ИЛЯХА ИЛЛЯ АНТА, АСТАГФИРУКА ВА АТУБУ ИЛЯЙК) – «Свят Ты, о Аллах, и хвала Тебе. Свидетельствую, что нет божест

🔥32😍1

19 May 2026, 14:32 UTC330 views9 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

📜 Опора на руки при подъеме из суджуда: как это правильно? Многие молящиеся при подъеме из земного поклона (суджуда) опираются на кулаки. Но что говорят об этом учёные Ислама? Согласно шафиитскому мазхабу, предпочтительным является опираться на ладони. Имам ар-Рамли в своем труде «Нихаятуль Мухтадж» пишет: و يسن (أن يعتمد في قيامه من السجود والقعود على يديه) أي: بطنهما مبسوطتين على الأرض؛ للاتباع ، ذكراً كان أو قو

🔥4👍32

13 May 2026, 13:28 UTC338 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

У Всевышнего Аллаха только 99 имен? Часто люди думают, что имен ровно девяносто девять, однако ученые разъясняют этот вопрос иначе. Имам аль-Байхаки да помилует его Аллах, пишет: ‏وليس في قول النبيِّ صلَّى الله عليهِ وسلَّمَ : (( إنَّ للهِ تسعةً وتسعينَ اسماً )) نفْيُ غيرِها، وإنما وقعَ التخصيصُ بذكرها لأنها أشهرُ الأسماء وأبينُها معانيَ ، وفيها وردَ الخبرُ بأن مَنْ أحصاها دخلَ الجنة، وفي رواية سفيان : (( مَنْ حف

3🔥3👍2

12 May 2026, 15:28 UTC301 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Если по каким-либо причинам вы не можете совершить садждату тилават!: «Согласно ученым шафиитского мазхаба, заменяет земной поклон (саджда ат-тилява) следующее: если человек услышал аят земного поклона, он говорит: (سبحان الله، والحمد لله، ولا إله إلا الله، والله أكبر) "Субханаллах, ва-ль-хамду лиллях, ва ля иляха илляллах, валлаху акбар" (Пречист Аллах, хвала Аллаху, нет божества, кроме Аллаха, Аллах Велик). Это

6👌3👍3

6 May 2026, 17:42 UTC318 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

t.me/anonaskbot?start=336vy Интересующие вопросы можно задать анонимно))

2👍2🤔1

1 May 2026, 17:38 UTC372 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Постановление о чтении вслух и про себя в намазе: قال الإمام النووي رحمه الله : (واعلم أن الجهر في مواضعه، والإسرار في مواضعه سنة ليس بواجب، فلو جهر موضع الإسرار، أو أسر موضع الجهر، فصلاته صحيحة، ولكنه ارتكب المكروه كراهة تنزيه، ولا يسجد للسهو) Имам ан-Навави сказал: «Знай, что чтение вслух в соответствующих местах и чтение про себя в соответствующих местах является сунной (желательным действием), а не обязательн

5👍3🔥2

30 Apr 2026, 14:50 UTC308 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

فائدة: لا تكون القراءة للقرآن خارج الصلاة بالجهر أو بالسرّ إلا بتحريك اللسان، ومن قرأ القرآن بغير تحريك لسانه، فلا يعدّ قارئًا، بل يعدّ متفكرًا، ولا ينال من الأجر والثواب ما ينال القارئ بلسانه. (Примечание): Чтение Корана вне намаза, будь то вслух или про себя, не считается действительным, если не задействуется язык (то есть не движутся губы и язык). Тот, кто читает Коран, не двигая языком, не считается чтецом, а с

5👍2🔥2

20 Apr 2026, 14:33 UTC402 views8 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Чтение Корана красивым голосом: قالَ الامام النّووي: «أجمعَ العُلماءُ منَ السَّلفِ والخلَفِ منَ الصَّحابةِ والتَّابعينَ وَمَنْ بَعْدَهم مِنْ عُلماءِ الأَمْصارِ منْ أَئمّةِ المُسْلمينَ عَلَى استحبابِ تحسينِ الصَّوتِ بالقُرآنِ... مَالم يخرجْ عنْ حَدِّ القراءةِ بالتَّمطيطِ، فإنْ أفرطَ حتَّىٰ زادَ حَرْفًا أوْ أَخْفَاهُ، فهوَ حَرَامٌ». (التبيان في آداب حملة القرآن للإمام النووي/ ٩٤.) Имам ан-Навави сказал: «Учёные — к

4👍3🔥1

13 Apr 2026, 06:07 UTC371 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Беда — это наказание от Аллаха или испытание? «Верующему в Аллаха человеку свойственно задаваться вопросом, когда его постигает какое-либо несчастье: является ли оно наказанием за совершённый им грех или же это проявление того изначального Божественного закона (сунны), который распространяется на всех людей, включая посланников, пророков и праведников (авлия), ради той мудрости, что была разъяснена ранее? Верующему

4😭2👍1

12 Apr 2026, 18:01 UTC286 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

О прикосновении к Корану и его чтении женщиной во время хайда (менструации) в маликитском мазхабе: «Также маликиты разрешили женщине в период менструации или послеродового очищения касаться Корана целиком или его части с целью обучения или преподавания. Своё решение они обосновывают необходимостью процесса обучения и преподавания, а также опасением забыть выученное из-за повторяющихся менструаций и длительности посл

2🔥2👍1

9 Apr 2026, 04:21 UTC253 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://fondinsan.ru/share/EqamcjipauS5BbVt5

4👍2🔥1😨1

6 Apr 2026, 02:28 UTC261 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @kaidylhatir

Ата ибн Аби Рабах передал, что Муса (мир ему) сказал: يا رب، هذا الغيث لا ينزل، وينزل فلا ينفع، قال: كثرة الزنا، وظهور الربا «О Господь мой! Этот дождь — то не идет, а когда нисходит — не приносит пользы». Всевышний ответил: «[Причина тому] распространение прелюбодеяния и открытое ростовщичество». 📖 «ибн Аби Дунья»

5🔥1😨1😭1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @khavatir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,017,899 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“خواطر الطالب” (@khavatir), 678 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/khavatir.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.