Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Погоня за истиной

@khalitovakk

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

212subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001926273458
TypeChannel
Username@khalitovakk
DescriptionЗдесь про исследования Контакт: @keterinaa
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/khalitovakk

Growth

2126 Aug 2026, 02:06 — 212 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 03:32 — 212 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 02:067 Aug 2026, 03:32
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 211–213 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 03:32212no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:06212first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 23 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
73.1%
avg views ÷ 212 subscribers
Avg views / post
155
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held12 (23 June 202631 July 2026)
Views total465
Reactions total60
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 03:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
101
Videos
4
Links
54

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

204 reactions across 12 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥6330.9%
5928.9%
😁3416.7%
👍178.33%
🥰146.86%
💘136.37%
😱31.47%
🤣10.49%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 204reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 07:51 UTC104 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

адекватные люди общаются с ИИ как с джунами, вежливо и подробно давая фидбэк тем временем я 🤣: Это я так с Fable 5, не подружились мы

😁18🤣1

29 Jul 2026, 09:39 UTC150 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вакансии на UX-исследователя в Контур Привет, ребята! Мы очень ищем сильных ресерчеров в две команды: Маркировка и Экстерн. Если вы хотели бы попасть к нам и подходите под требования вакансии или у вас есть друг, который подошел бы, то напишите мне, я зарефералю кандидатов 💗 Прошу обратить внимание, мы ожидаем • Опыт работы в роли UX-исследователя от 2 лет • Опыт работы в команде разработки • Проактивность и умен

🔥11

22 Jul 2026, 12:01 UTC211 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Цель — делать жизнь людей рядом круче Сегодня от моей коллеги Майи, исследователя из другого продукта, пришло сообщение Катя, я хочу выразить свое восхищение и благодарность по поводу того, что ты делаешь! Я вот реально так много опираюсь на твои артефакты. Например, сейчас сделала карту работ по аналогии с твоей картой с МК по JTBD Также по твоим гайдам и скиллам обучила ИИшку писать гайды и анализ исследований Ты

🥰149🔥7

15 Jul 2026, 09:34 UTC242 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Создание skills и обмен ими: часть 1 Скиллы (Skills) — это многоразовые микроинструкции и «шаблоны процессов», которые объясняют ИИ, как именно нужно выполнять конкретную задачу. Хочу поделиться с вами набором скиллов, которые создала чтобы автоматизировать рутинную работу исследователя c помощью ИИшки. На шаринг меня вдохновил Виктор Буто (@victorbuto), который записал афигенный видос про создание skills. Очень р

🔥18

9 Jul 2026, 13:00 UTC240 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Подарила мужу вот такую футболку на годовщину Теперь понятно, кто у кого в заложниках 🤭

😁166

8 Jul 2026, 12:29 UTC183 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В мае совместно с командой PathWay у нас был вебинар на тему взаимодействия исследователя и продакта. Сегодня выпустили карточки и целую статью по следам этого митапа ☑️🥳

3

8 Jul 2026, 12:29 UTC204 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @pthwyPhoto

Ресёрч-культура здесь и сейчас: как всё устроено в команде Контура В этом году мы запустили серию онлайн-митапов с сильными продуктовыми командами — чтобы всем нам было где поучиться друг у друга. Начали с обсуждения работы в связке исследователь + дизайнер с командой Ozon, а затем перешли к паре исследователь + продакт — с командой Контур.Фокуса: Катей Халитовой, исследователем пользовательского опыта, и Аней Гурье

9

4 Jul 2026, 05:38 UTC≈2,350 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Материалы с мастер-класса по JTBD и УЦП МК прошел очень продуктивно, было море вопросов по применению фреймворка и это круто! Я сама для себя подтвердила гипотезу о том, что все плюс/минус знают тему, но нюансов по применению, ограничений по фреймворку крайне много, из-за этого и есть вопросы. Для участников МК и подписчиков своего канала я подготовила подборку моих любимых материалов по теме. Enjoy! Книги 1️⃣Джи

12🔥9👍2

3 Jul 2026, 09:48 UTC197 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Прямое включение с Kontur UX Base 2026 Конференция проходит достаточно интенсивно, много участников, много классного контента. Я в восторге и вижу как выросла подготовка конференции по сравнению с прошлым годом. Слушая доклады, я вспомнила, насколько круто вообще-то быть исследователем, насколько это сложная работа 🥹 Такие конференции дают почву для знакомств, для обмена опытом, разгрузки и для новых инсайтов о рол

🔥116

2 Jul 2026, 08:02 UTC189 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Трансформация роли исследователя из-за LLM Сейчас в Контуре я занимаюсь тестированием и пилотированием внедрения ИИ в работу UX-исследователя. Любые изменения глобально имеют сопротивление в компаниях – это база, ИИ не является исключением. Но почему с ИИ это особенно ярко? Приведу цитату из интервью глобального CEO Яндекса Шулейко: «Раньше эффективность твоего производства/труда зависила оттого, как потрудилась т

9🔥7😱3

24 Jun 2026, 08:29 UTC274 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Реальный кейс, когда dogfooding вредит результатам исследования В прошлом месяце мы проводили юзабилити-тестирование новой фичи. В выборке было две группы пользователей: 📃3 сотрудника из нашей компании, которые формально подходили под ЦА 📃5 внешних пользователей Разница в поведении на юзабилити-тестировании — огромная. Что я увидела у внутренних участников? ☀️Воодушевление ещё до начала сессии. «Да, давайте, это

👍15

23 Jun 2026, 06:55 UTC≈1,300 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Подарок от подписчиков Сегодня у меня день рождения 🌼И на правах именнинка у меня есть к вам две просьбы: 🌸Мне будет очень приятно, если вы поделитесь публично или в частном порядке моим каналом с вашими коллегами и друзьями. Это поможет продвижению и будет для меня подарком 🥰 🔆🔆💝🔆🔆 🌸Будет круто, если в комментариях под этим постом, вы расскажете о себе и мы познакомимся поближе. Мне очень интересно, кто меня чит

💘135

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @khalitovakk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 66,827 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Погоня за истиной” (@khalitovakk), 212 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/khalitovakk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.