💥Wahlbetrug in Brandenburg? Der SPD-Kanzler führt die unbeliebteste Koalition aller Zeiten und die SPD soll knapp fünf Prozent zugelegt haben? Eine Analyse. 📺Das Video auf X.
👍13❤2

Channel
@keoppelroger
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
524subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001646905813 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @keoppelroger |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/keoppelroger |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 08:45 | 524 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:37 | 525 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:01 | 524 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:22 | 524 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 23 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 September 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
22 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 17 | 77.3% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 22.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 23 September 2024 to 23 September 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💥Wahlbetrug in Brandenburg? Der SPD-Kanzler führt die unbeliebteste Koalition aller Zeiten und die SPD soll knapp fünf Prozent zugelegt haben? Eine Analyse. 📺Das Video auf X.
👍13❤2
Wahlbetrug in Brandenburg? Ich habe leider keinen Kontakt mehr zu demjenigen, der mein Wahlanalysen immer gemacht hat. Zu obiger Grafik sagen die Community Notes, dass das eben eine Momentaufnahme war und nicht die Prognose. Schaut euch mal den gesamten Thread an. Angeblich gab es auch eine verdächtige Störung. Wenn die Daten dort stimmen, waren es die Briefwahlen die das Ergebnis krass nach unten gezogen haben. F…
👍3
3 SCHRITTE, UM IHRE INVESTITION ZU STARTEN UND 100 % GEWINN ZU VERDIENEN. 1. Holen Sie sich Ihr Bitcoin-Wallet, LASSEN SIE ES REGISTRIEREN UND VERIFIZIERT. 2. Holen Sie sich Ihr Bitcoin-Wallet Mit dem Betrag finanziert DES INVESTITIONSKAPITALS VON DEINE ENTSCHEIDUNG. 3. WIR STARTEN IHREN HANDEL Den Markt vorhersehen RICHTUNG UND WIR MACHEN SIE HABEN GEWÜNSCHTEN GEWINN. KONTAKT: t.me/Tradingassist3 ☎️ UM ZU STARTE…
Briefwähler Wahlen Schwarz, Grün und BSW? Aber bei der AfD gibt es eine sehr große Differenz? „Jeder Mathematiker/Statistiker kann nur zweifelsfrei festhalten, dass eine andere Möglichkeit als massiver Wahlbetrug bei den Briefwahlstimmen völlig undenkbar ist. Eine derartige Abweichung ist bei einem so großem Anteil an der Grundgesamtheit (1/3) mathematisch schlichtweg nicht möglich.“ Florian Machl https://x.com/fm…
❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Die SPD gewinnt knapp... allerdings mit einem kleinen Wermutstropfen
#BTC /USDT ANALYSIS Bitcoin gewinnt an Dynamik, nachdem es aus dem absteigenden Dreieck ausgebrochen ist, wobei die Ichimoku-Wolke ebenfalls eine bullische Stärke zeigt. Derzeit fungiert 200MA als Widerstand und die Kursbewegung versucht, diese Barriere zu durchbrechen. Ein erfolgreicher Ausbruch über 200MA würde einen weiteren Aufwärtstrend für BTC signalisieren.
👍1
Das mit diesen Briefwahlen scheint immer gut zu funktionieren, oder?
❤1
Wahlergebnis der jungen Generation und 70+ Brandenburg
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @keoppelroger. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@keoppelroger named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Roger Köppel” (@keoppelroger), 524 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/keoppelroger.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.