Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

کاتب باشی📝

@kateb_bashi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

931subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001349460086
TypeChannel
Username@kateb_bashi
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kateb_bashi

Growth

931932931.56 August 2026 — 932 subscribers6 August 2026 — 932 subscribers14 August 2026 — 931 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 931–932 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 02:07931-1
6 Aug 2026, 21:31932no change
6 Aug 2026, 21:21932first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.2%
avg views ÷ 931 subscribers
Avg views / post
94.7
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.57%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (17 February 20266 August 2026)
Views total568
Reactions total11
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 21:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

49 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3469.4%
👍714.3%
💔48.16%
🕊24.08%
👌12.04%
😱12.04%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 February 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 16:22 UTC20 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @katebbashi_bookVideo

. بعضی آدما ثابت می‌کنن برای شروع دوباره، هیچ وقت دیر نیست موافقی؟

3 Aug 2026, 15:38 UTC60 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @katebbashi_book

چون خود را بدست آوردی، خوش می‌رو! اگر کسی دیگر را یابی، دست به گردنِ او درآور! و اگر نیابی، دست به گردنِ خویشتن در‌آور! مقالات شمس تبریزی

1

28 Jul 2026, 19:42 UTC113 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @katebbashi_bookVideo

این، تنها صدای به‌جامونده از سهراب سپهری است؛ شاعری که بیشتر با شعرهایش شناخته میشه تا صدایش... اگر تا امروز صدای او را نشنیدید، این چند ثانیه را از دست ندید✨🌿. به نظرتون، شنیدن صدای یک شاعر، چقدر نگاهتون رو به شعرهاش عوض میکنه؟

2

26 Jul 2026, 12:47 UTC106 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @katebbashi_bookVideo

قسمتی از آلبوم «در گلستانه» آهنگساز: #هوشنگ_کامکار آواز: #شهرام_ناظری شعر: #سهراب_سپهری دکلمه: #احمدرضا_احمدی

2

25 Jul 2026, 06:40 UTC120 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @katebbashi_bookVideo

🔺 اکبر عبدی سلطان کمدی سینمای ایران، در حدود ۴ دهه، در بیش از ۸۰ فیلم سینمایی و در متنوع‌ترین ژانرها و نقش‌ها هنرنمایی کرده بود؛ روحش شاد

19 Jul 2026, 04:04 UTC149 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @katebbashi_bookVideo

درخت باش درختان رهروانی خاموشند. سلوکشان در سکوت رفتن است. می روند و می دوند و کسی صدای پایشان را نمی شود، بی هیاهو رسیدن رمز جوانمردی ست. تابستان که می شود، میوه ها که می رسند، تازه باخبر می شویم که این درخت که همه ی چهار فصل پا به پای ما ایستاده بود، نایستاده بود، که او همه ی سرد و سخت زمستان را لخت و عور و بی برگ و بار دویده بود؛ و این میوه، نتیجه آن همه در نهان دویدن است. درخت باش از راه پنهان برو، در نهان دو

6

10 Jul 2026, 14:52 UTC176 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @katebbashi_bookVideo

آیا لباس سیاه می‌تواند باعث مشکلات روانی شود؟ #سادگورو

1👍1

7 Jul 2026, 07:02 UTC190 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @katebbashi_book

و گفت : عشق بهره ای است از آن دریا که خلق را در آن گذر نیست ، آتشی است که جان را در او گذر نیست ، آورد بُردی است که بنده را خبر نیست در آن ، و آنچه بدین دریاها نهند باز نشود ، مگر به دو چیز : یکی اندوه و یکی نیاز. #تذکره_الاولیاء #ابوالحسن_خرقانی 🍃🌷🍃

4

26 Jun 2026, 13:03 UTC240 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @katebbashi_bookPhoto

🍃🍃 ... دشوار است چنان عشق بورزیم که خودِ عشق باقی بماند، نه میل به معشوق‌بودن ( یا خواستِ این‌که ما را دوست بدارند). دشوار است عشق را چنان نگه داریم که اگر به هیچ سرانجامی نرسید، مجبور نباشیم آن را بازیِ باخته بدانیم؛ بلکه بتوانیم بگوییم: «برای چنین چیزی آماده بودم و این‌طور هم اشکالی ندارد.» #ویتگنشتاین

1

13 Jun 2026, 19:04 UTC239 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @katebbashi_book

یک جایی در بازی بوکس هست که آنکه دارد زیاد ضربه می‌خورد ناگهان خودش را می‌چسباند به حریف! انگار حریف را در آغوش می‌گیرد. شبیه یک جور یکی شدن. بهش می‌گویند «کلینج».☘️ بعد حریف باید تا جدا شدن تن‌ها صبر کند و او که «کلینج» کرده فرصتی پیدا می‌کند کمی نفس بکشد بدون اینکه آسیبی ببیند. بازی این روزهای ما با روزگار هم «کلینج» کردن مدام است. در آغوش کشیدن روزگار از روی خستگی با صورتی زخمی. در آغوش کشیدن به جای جنگیدن، مثل

1👍1

12 Jun 2026, 10:31 UTC607 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

عشق و جنگ ...و خداوند چون تنها بود نمی توانست عشق را درک کند پس انسان را آفرید و تکه ایی از روح خود را در او نهاد که به وسیله ی او عشق بورزد و عاشق شود. روزها و سالها کذشت،همه چیز خیلی آرام و ساکن بود،برای همین انسان دیگر عاشق نشد. خدا حوصله اش سر رفت،پس جنگ را آفرید.هر وقت صدای گلوله و موشک می آمد انسانها از ترس هم را در آغوش می‌گرفتند و سرشان را روی قلب هم می گذاشتند و یکدیگر را می بوسیدند و طوری عشق‌بازی میکردند ک

🕊2💔1😱1

11 Jun 2026, 13:18 UTC214 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @katebbashi_book

#بخشی_از_یک_کتاب ‌‌هیچ تکیه‌گاهی جز خویشتن ندارد. او از ناتوانیِ فهماندن خود به دیگران رنج می‌بَرَد؛ اما هیچ اشتیاق عبثی به هدایت دیگران احساس نمی‌کند. ‌ #کیرکگارد ترس و لرز

👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kateb_bashi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 760,567 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“کاتب باشی📝” (@kateb_bashi), 931 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kateb_bashi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.